Constructivism Flashcards
Who did Constructivism criticise and what for?
Constructivism scolded neorealism and neoliberalism for their failure to explain contemporary global transformations.
Constructivism came about from the neo-neo debate.
What was the neo-neo debate?
Neorealists; believed the anarchic structure put constraints on states to adopt a self help system to survive.
neoliberal; believe no institutions lead to conflict, we can think of institutional structure where states have mutual interest.
Define individualism? (the neo neo commitment to it)
actors as fixed units with fixed interests.
Define materialism
structure that constrains behaviour is material forces.
What is there no emphasis on by the Neo’s ?
no emphasis on the role if ideas or how norms shape states interests as they believe interests are fixed.
This constructivist theory understands change…
and how ideas bring about change .
What do ideas shape?
how we construct / interpret the world and how we see ourselves.
how important are material forces?
Only as important as we give them meaning.
What are brute facts?
Brute facts; material substances that exist in nature; if human’s did not exist, they would still be there (e.g. oceans, forests, woods.)
What are social facts?
social facts; socially constructed (e.g. money, traffic lights, refugees, sovereignty) we give these ‘facts’ meaning through categorisation, shared norms and practices.
e.g. traffic lights, they are just colours but we give them meaning. red; stop, green; go.
What are ideational structures?
collectively held ideas (e.g knowledge, language, rules)
They do not only constrain actors but constitute their identities and interests and establish standards of appropriate behaviour for actors within a given identity..
What is the opposite of logic of appropriateness
logic of consequence
Define logic of consequence;
is a rational act/ cost and benefits analysis that produces an outcome that maximises interest of the state.
interest driven/ selfish.
Define logic of appropriateness?
how actors are rule following, concerned about legitimacy of actions, do things because “right thing to do.”
What do constructivists approaches help theorists to understand?
to understand changes in international politics which other IR theories can’t explain so well.