Constructive Trusts Flashcards

1
Q

What is a constructive trust?

A

A trust imposed by operation of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What issues are there with the categorisation of constructive trusts?

A

Some constructive trusts still give effect to the parties’ intentions.

Automatic resulting trusts appear to be better classified as constructive trusts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the unjust enrichment argument for constructive trusts and why is this bad?

A

An argument that constructive trusts exist to reverse unjust enrichment.

But there is not always an injustice when a constructive trust arises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the unconscionability argument for constructive trusts? Why doesn’t it work?

A

Constructive trusts arise where somebody behaved unconscionably.

Unconscionability doesn’t justify the creation of a constructive trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Is there a unifying principle of constructive trusts?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the rules for specifically enforceable duties to confer assets?

A

When a person contracts to transfer property, the contract will be specifically enforceable.

Meaning that the house will be held on constructive trust.

If the house is sold to someone else, you have a claim against the third party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Rule in Re Rose?

A

The exception to the rule that equity won’t perfect an imperfect gift - Jones v Lock.

It refers to share transfers - a share transfer form must be executed for legal title to shares to be passed.

A trust arises in favour of the receiver when the share purchase form is transferred - the donor must do everything in their trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Pennington v Waine do to the rule in Re Rose?

A

The share transfer form was sent to the auditor for a company rather than the company itself.

On a reading of Re Rose she would not have done all that was in her power.

Arden LJ found that a constructive trust arose because it would have been unconscionable for A to have changed her mind.

This makes the content of the rule unclear - Jones v Lock might be caught under it now.

Why would it have been unconscionable for A to change her mind?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are secret trusts?

A

Trusts to be created on your death which don’t follow the formalities of the Wills Act.

They look a lot like express trusts as they give rise to the will of the settlor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the law on oral trusts of land?

A

Land conveyed to T without following statutory formalities.

The law gives effect to the trust to avoid the trustee from gaining the trust property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the rule on mistaken payments?

A

Chase Manhattan v Israel-British Bank - a constructive trust arose.

Browne-Wilkinson in Westdeutsche said that there will be a constructive trust for mistaken payment when the receiver learns of the payment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the rule on theft and why is it strange?

A

Browne-Wilkinson in Westdeutsche - a thief holds stolen property on trust for the proper owner.

But the thief does not deprive the owner of his legal title, but this legal title will be lost if money is paid into a bank account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the rule for trusts arising from profits made by the fiduciary?

A

Any profit made by the fiduciary is held on trust for the beneficiary.

Rather than a personal claim which strictly allows the trustee to keep their profit.

  1. Money owned at the outset by the beneficiary.
  2. Intervening to take money by yourself which would have become another’s.
  3. Bribes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Lister v Stubbs say? When did it change?

A

The only claim for money obtained by breach of fiduciary duty (bribe) was personal.

This was rejected in AG for Hong Kong v Reid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is Reid deemed to have been badly described?

A

A personal claim could cover the value of the bribe - there is no need for a proprietary claim.

A personal claim would not have a negative impact on the defendant’s other creditors in the event of insolvency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the leading case now?

A

FHR v Cedar Capital - Cedar Capital took bribes from a hotel to gain business from FHR.

The court upheld that the remedy is proprietary.

The court said that the property will be held on trust whenever a fiduciary makes a gain from breach of trust.

17
Q

What is the nature of uncertainty in mistaken transfers and more importantly profits acquired in breach of fiduciary duty?

A

There is debate over whether this liability should be proprietary or personal?

It is suggested that the remedy should be tailored so that third party protection and insolvency priority.

18
Q

What is the remedial constructive trust? What is the other type of constructive trust?

A

Browne-Wilkinson in Westdeutsche - a constructive trust which depends on an exercise of judicial discretion.

Institutional constructive trusts arise by operation of rules of law.

19
Q

What are the pros and cons of remedial trusts?

A

They give the courts flexibility as to whether the third party should be bound.

However, some deem it illegitimate for the courts to have this discretion and some think that it would be too uncertain.

20
Q

What is the illegitimacy argument?

A

It looks like the court is being given a ‘robin hood’ power to reallocate property rights.

But the law of trusts itself is judge-made, judges have always had this power.

21
Q

What is the uncertainty argument?

A

There is merit in the fact that we can’t predict how the freedom of the court will be exercised.

But there is tension between certainty and justice - shouldn’t we be concerned with reaching the right conclusions?

22
Q

Why should we not accept remedial trusts?

A

Courts can have different varieties of discretion;

  1. Rule-making/rule-changing/rule-completing discretion.
  2. Rule-rejecting discretion.

Remedial trusts involve the rule-rejecting discretion which involves rejecting the idea that like cases must be treated alike.

Remedial trusts are illegitimate, inconsistent and worse, unjust.

Lord Millett in Foskett v McKeown.