Constitutional Reform since 1997 Flashcards
Demand for reform
Came from groups wanting to modeise Britich institutions and a growing distrust in traditional ones
Growind demand from Scotland and fix problems in NI
Came about in 1997 under Tony Blair New Labour
Debates about wether these reforms went far enough
HoL Refrom
HoL Act 1999 removed all but 92 hereditary peers
Lords became mainly appointed based on merit as opposed to by birth with hereditary removed mainly.
Reform did enough: HoL 1999
More modenised, legitimate and proffessional body and removed majority of hereditary peers.
Unelected house means experts can be appointed e.g. Lord Norton (constitution expert)
People who represent underrepresented groups in society can be appointed e.g. Lord Bird (ex-homeless man and founder of Big Issure) represent the homeless
Did Enough; HoL 1999 Life Peers
Dont have to worry about election or removal from office therefor cn consider the long-term interests of the country
More reform is needed: HoL 1999
Still 92 hereditary peers wiich is outdated in meritocratic society
26 bishops but no representation of other religions
Party leader can still make appointments (potentially unjust)
Remains unelected despite influencing lawmaking and holdint government account
Very Large and Costly, 800 peers, 2nd largest legislative chamber in the world. 2017 Burns report called for a reduction in size and term limits of members
Devolution Reform 1998
1998 Scotland Act, Northern Ireland Act and Government of Wales Act extablished devolution.
Growing demand for Scottish independence and a need to unite NI (Unionist and Nationalist Parties)
Reform did enough: Devolution 1998
Transformed the situation in NI through the Assembly and The Good Friday agreement
Until collapse of power-sharing agreement in 2017, parties worked together
Calls for devolution in england but referendum rejected idea of an elected regional assembly
More devolution needed: Wales
Has has multiple pieces of legislation furthering its powers due to the imbalanc eof powers it was given in 1998 compared to Scotland
Welsh Nationalist movement has been goriwng and demand has gone up.
More devolution needed: Scotland
2014 Scottish I referendum narrowly won by unionists. The SNP are much more populer and electorally successful than 1998
Further devolution to Scotland in 2016
More devolution needed: NI
Since 2016 discussions on how brexit will work with NI as it Borders Republic of Ireland (EU)
NI Act 1998 will needed to be amended in brexit process causing possible conflict with Ireland
More devolution needed: England
West Lothian Question - Scottish Mp’s able to vote in HoC on matters that only affect England whilst English MP’s have no say in devolved Scottish matter. Answered by EVEL (English Votes for English Laws) BUT was abolished in July 2021
Barnett Formula - amount of funding each part of Uk is given as devised in 1978. Formula means Scotland, Wales and NI receive more money than England.
HRA 1998
Incorporated ECHR into UK law, contained freedoms to life, a fair trial, of expression and from discrimination.
States must hold free and fair elections, abolish the death penalty, give foreigners the same rights as all citizens
HRA: Supreme Court
Judiciary must make rulings compatible with the HRA, public bodies cannot act that would break the convention
SC can strike down secondary legislation incompatible with the HRA, but for primary they can only issue a ‘Doctrine of Incompatibility, urging parliament to change statute due to parliamentary soveriegnty.
HRA Did Enough
Rights of British Citizens are clearly laid out in one easily accessible piece of legislation
8-fold increase in HR cases after the HRA was passed.
More Reform is needed: HRA
Some conservatves want to replace with a British Bill of Rights that defines certain rights more narrowly.
Despite HRA it’s possible for the government to restrict the human rights of individuals…
Example - 2005 government introduced control orders to restrict movements of suspected terrorists. To do this they had to declare and exemption fro Article 5 of the HRA for those who fall under suspicion.