Constitutional Law Flashcards

1
Q

Standing

A

1) injury in fact; 2) causation; 3) redressability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Exceptions to no third party standing

A

1) close relationship; 2) allowed if third party unlikely to be able to assert own rights; 3) organizational standing (note plaintiff must independently meet all other standing requirements)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Organizational standing

A

1) members have standing; 2) interests germane to organization’s purpose; 3) neither claim nor relief requires participation of individual members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Generalized grievances

A

No. Plaintiff cannot be suing solely as citizen or taxpayer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Exception to prohibition of generalized grievances

A

Taxpayers have standing to challenge expenditures pursuant to fed statutes as violating Establishment Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ripeness

A

1) hardship that will be suffered without preenforcement review; 2) fitness of issues and the record for judicial review.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mootness

A

If events after filing end plaintiff’s injury then case dismissed as moot (live controversy at all stages of review)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Exceptions to mootness

A

1) wrong capable of repetition but evading review; 2) voluntary cessation and free to resume at any time; 3) class action suits (so long as at least one member still has live controversy, ok)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Political question doctrine

A

1) republican form of government; 2) challenges to President’s conduct in foreign policy; 3) challenges to impeachment and removal process; 4) challenges to partisan gerrymandering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Supreme Court review without writ of cert

A

1) appeals for three judge district court panels; 2) original and exclusive jx for suits between state governments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Final judgment rule

A

SCOTUS may hear cases only after there’s been final judgment of highest state court/fed ct. of appeal, or 3 judge fed district court; generally no interlocutory review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Independent and adequate state law ground of decision

A

If state court decision rests on two grounds, one state one fed, if SCOTUS reversal of fed law ground wouldn’t change outcome in case, SCOTUS can’t hear it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can federal courts and state courts hear suits against state governments?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sovereign immunity (11th Amendment)

A

Bars suits against: 1) states in fed court; 2) states in state courts or fed agencies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Exceptions to sovereign immunity

A

1) Waiver (explicit); 2) states sued pursuant to section 5 of 14th Amendment (only, no other Constitutional provisions); 3) fed government sues state governments; 4) bankruptcy proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Suits against state officers

A

allowed. Can be sued for injunctive relief and money damages (so long as paid out of own pockets and not from state treasury that will be paying retroactive damages)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Abstention

A

Fed courts may not enjoin pending state court proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Congress’s authority to act

A

Must be express or implied power (no general police power but can tax/spend for police power and can legislate under exceptions to police power - military, Indian reservations, fed land/territories, D.C.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Necessary and proper clause

A

Congress may make all laws necessary and proper to carry out authority, ALWAYS attached to other Constitutional provisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Taxing and spending for general welfare

A

Congress can act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Congressional Commerce Power

A

1) regulate channels of interstate commerce; 2) regulate instrumentalities of interstate commerce and persons or things in interstate commerce; 3) may regulate economic activities that have substantial effect on interstate commerce (in area of non-economic activity, a substantial effect cannot be based on cumulative impact)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Tenth Amendment

A

Limits Congressional powers - all powers not granted to U.S. nor prohibited to states, are reserved to states or people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Can Congress compel state regulatory or legislative action?

A

No (e.g., conscripting state officials), but CAN induce action by putting strings on grants, so long as conditions are expressly stated and related to the purpose of the spending program (can’t be unduly coercive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Can Congress prohibit harmful commercial activity by state governments?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Congress’s power under section 5 of 14th Amendment

A

Can’t create new rights or expand scope of rights; can act to prevent or remedy violations of rights recognized by courts and laws must be proportionate and congruent to remedying proven violations (narrowly tailored)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Limits on Congressional delegation of powers

A

none on ability to delegate legislative power; legislative/line item vetoes unconstitutional (need bicameralism and presentment); may not delegate executive power to itself or officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Executive foreign policy power

A

1) enter into treaties with advice and consent of Senate; 2) make executive agreements w/o Senate input; 3) broad powers as Commander-in-Chief to use American troops in foreign countries even if not necessarily military in nature (e.g., humanitarian aid)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Executive domestic affairs power

A

1) appointment power (ambassadors, fed judges, officers of U.S. - Congress can vest appointment of inferior officers in President, heads of departments or lower fed courts, can’t give itself or officers appointment power); 2) removal power (unless removal limited by statute, President may fire any executive branch office); 3) Executive privilege (may yield to other important governmental interests); 4) Pardon power over those accused of or convicted of federal crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Ability of Congress to limit removal of executive branch officers

A

1) must be an office where independence from President is desirable; and 2) Congress cannot prohibit removal, can only limit removal to showing good cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Impeachment of POTUS, VPOTUS, federal judges/officers

A

impeached and removed from office for treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors. Impeachment by majority of House (doesn’t remove from office); conviction by 2/3 vote in Senate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Presidential immunity from civil suits

A

Absolute immunity from civil suits for money damages for actions while in office, no immunity for actions that occurred prior to taking office

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Preemption

A

Supremacy Clause provides Constitution and laws/treaties made pursuant to it are supreme law of land and preempt state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Express preemption

A

Fed statute expressly says it’s exclusive in an area, then state/local laws preempted even if they don’t directly conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Implied preemption (even if fed statute silent)

A

1) if fed/state laws mutually exclusive, fed law preempts; 2) if state law impedes achievement of fed objective, fed law preempts; 3) if Congress evidences clear intent to preempt state law (wholly occupies field) - fed law preempts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Intergovernmental immunity

A

States may not tax or regulate federal government activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause (Negative implication of Commerce Clause)

A

State/local law unconstitutional if it places undue burden on interstate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV

A

No state may deprive other states’ citizens privileges and immunities it gives its own citizens (only applies when state discriminates against out of staters))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause of 14th Amendment

A

Only applies to right to travel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

When does a state law discriminate between in state and out of state?

A

When does not apply the same way to in state and out of state residents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Analysis if state law does not discriminate between in state and out of state

A

1) Privileges and Immunities of article IV doesn’t apply; 2) If law burdens interstate commerce, it violates dormant commerce clause if burdens exceed benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Analysis if state law discriminates between in state and out of state

A

1) If law burdens interstate commerce then dormant commerce clause violated unless necessary to achieve important government purpose (bop on government, exception of Congressional approval and market participant); 2) If law discriminates against out of staters with regard to ability to earn livelihood (or civil liberties/important economic activities), violates P&I clause of Article IV, unless necessary to achieve important government purpose. Corps/aliens can’t use P&I clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

State taxation of interstate commerce

A

1) may not use tax systems to help in state business; 2) may only tax activities if substantial nexus to state; 3) state taxation of interstate commerce must be fairly apportioned (i.e., fairly connected to in state activity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Full faith and credit

A

courts in one state must give full faith and credit to judgments of courts in another state so long as: 1) rendering court had jx; 2) on merits; 3) final

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Congress’s power under the 13th Amendment

A

Can be used to prohibit private race discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Applying Constitutional norms to private conduct

A

13th Amendment to prohibit private race discrimination; commerce power (e.g., Ollie’s BBQ); canNOT use section 5 of 14th Amendment to regulate private behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Situations where private conduct must comply with Constitution

A

1) Private entity is performing a task traditionally, exclusively done by government (public function exception); 2) government affirmatively authorizes, encourages, or facilitates unconstitutional activity (entanglement; ex - courts can’t enforce racially restrictive covenants; government leases premises to restaurant that racially discriminates; state provides books to schools that racially discriminate; private entity regulates sports within a state; no state action where: private school funded < 99% by government fires teacher based on speech; NCAA orders suspension of basketball coach at state university; private club with liquor license from state that racially discriminates)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Application of Bill of Rights

A

Only applies to fed government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

How are the Bill of Rights applied to state/local government?

A

Incorporation through Due Process Clause of 14th Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Exception to incorporation of bill of rights to states through 14th Amendment

A

3rd A right to not have soldier in house; 5th A right to grand jury indictment in criminal cases; 7th A right to jury trial in civil cases; 8th A right against excessive fines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Levels of Scrutiny

A

Rational basis, intermediate, strict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Rational Basis test

A

bop on plaintiff; law upheld if rationally related to any legitimate governmental interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

bop probably on government; law upheld if substantially related to important governmental purpose (only look at actual purpose); means must be narrowly tailored to meet objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

bop on government; law upheld if necessary to achieve a compelling governmental purpose (has to be crucia/vital, only look at actual purpose); means must be necessary and narrowly tailored to meet goal…least intrusive means. Government usually loses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Procedural due process

A

procedures that govern government action taking away life, liberty, property (what kinds of notice)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Substantive due process

A

whether government has adequate reason for taking away L/L/P (primarily economic liberty and privacy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Equal protection

A

Whether government’s differences in treatment of people is justified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

When is there a deprivation of liberty?

A

Loss of significant freedom provided by Constitution or statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

4 notes about deprivation of liberty

A

1) except for emergency, before adult institutionalization, need notice and a hearing; 2) when parent institutionalizes a child, need screening by neutral fact finder (e.g., doctor); 3) harm to reputation by itself not loss of liberty; 4) prisoners rarely have liberty rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

When is there a deprivation of property?

A

if there is an entitlement and that entitlement not fulfilled

60
Q

Standard for government action depriving due process

A

Generally must be intentional or at least reckless action; however, in emergencies government liable only if action “shocks the conscience”

61
Q

Deprivation of due process if government fails to protect people from privately inflicted harms?

A

Generally, no…only if person is in government custody or government literally creates danger

62
Q

Test for procedures required under procedural d.p.

A

Balance: 1) importance of interest to individual; 2) ability of additional procedures to increase accuracy of fact-finding; 3) government’s interests

63
Q

Types of takings

A

1) possessory taking - government confiscation or physical occupation (no matter how small); 2) regulatory taking - reg leaves no reasonable economically viable use

64
Q

Takings clause

A

Government can take private property for public use if it provides just compensation; no level of scrutiny, separate test

65
Q

Types of takings

A

1) possessory taking - government confiscation or physical occupation (no matter how small); 2) regulatory taking - reg leaves no reasonable economically viable use

66
Q

Takings clause

A

Government can take private property for public use if it provides just compensation; no level of scrutiny, separate test

67
Q

When are government conditions on development of property not a taking?

A

When justified by benefit roughly proportionate to burden imposed…otherwise, taking

68
Q

What is public use?

A

Government can take only for public use; taking for public use if government acts based on reasonable belief that taking for public benefit (usually any taking satisfies this)

69
Q

What is just compensation?

A

Measured in terms of loss to owner in reasonable market value terms. Gains to taker irrelevant.

70
Q

Contracts clause

A

no state or local government may impair the obligations of existing contracts; only applies to state/local government, not the fed

71
Q

Level of scrutiny for right to privacy

A

Strict, protected under substantive due process

72
Q

Rights under rights to privacy falling under strict scrutiny

A

1) right to marry; 2) right to procreate; 3) right to custody of one’s children (state may, however, create presumption that married woman’s husband is father of child); 4) right to keep family together (must be related); 5) right to control upbringing of one’s children; 6) right to purchase and use contraceptives; 7) right to engage in private homosexual activity; 8) right to refuse medical treatment (may require clear and convincing evidence that person wanted treatment terminated and may prevent family members from terminating for each other NOTE…NO constitutional right to physician assisted death)

73
Q

Rights under rights to privacy falling under strict scrutiny

A

1) right to marry; 2) right to procreate; 3) right to custody of one’s children (state may, however, create presumption that married woman’s husband is father of child); 4) right to keep family together (must be related); 5) right to control upbringing of one’s children; 6) right to purchase and use contraceptives; 7) right to engage in private homosexual activity) NOTE…NO constitutional right to physician assisted death

74
Q

Right to abortion

A

protected under right to privacy, but different standard of review: 1) prior to viability - states may not prohibit but may regulate so long as don’t create undue burden on ability to obtain abortion; 2) after viability - states my prohibit abortions unless necessary to protect woman’s life or health.

75
Q

Government duty to subsidize abortions/provide in public hospitals

A

none

76
Q

Spousal consent/notification laws

A

unconstitutional

77
Q

Parental notice/consent laws

A

State may require parental notice/consent for unmarried minor’s abortion so long as it creates an alternative procedure where minor can go before a judge who can approve abortion by finding 1) in minor’s best interests or 2) minor is mature enough to decide herself

78
Q

Level of scrutiny related to 2nd Amendment right to bear arms

A

None articulated but states may regulate where/who/types

79
Q

Right to travel level of scrutiny

A

Fundamental right under 14th A/P&I clause - strict scrutiny

80
Q

Durational residency requirements

A

Must meet strict scrutiny under right to travel - where person must live in jx for certain amount of time prior to receiving benefits

81
Q

Restrictions on foreign travel scrutiny

A

rational basis (a.k.a. international travel)

82
Q

Right to vote levels of scrutiny

A

Laws that deny some citizens right to vote must meet strict scrutiny (under both EP and Fundamental right of DP), but regulations of electoral process to prevent fraud only need to be on balance desireable

83
Q

Is there a fundamental right to education?

A

No

84
Q

Level of scrutiny for classification on race/national origin

A

Strict scrutiny

85
Q

Proving existence of classification based on race/national origin

A

1) classification exists on face of the law or 2) if facially neutral, must demonstrate both discriminatory impact and discriminatory intent

86
Q

Scrutiny for classifications benefiting minorities

A

strict scrutiny

87
Q

Numerical set-asides of minorities

A

Require clear proof of past discrimination

88
Q

How may educational institutions use race for applications?

A

Quota/add points = no. As one factor = yes

89
Q

Level of scrutiny for public school systems using race as a factor for assigning students to schools

A

strict scrutiny

90
Q

Level of scrutiny for gender classifications

A

intermediate (adding on requirement of “exceedingly persuasive justification”

91
Q

Proving existence of gender classification

A

1) exists on the face of the law; 2) facially neutral - then must prove discriminatory impact and intent

92
Q

Scrutiny for gender classifications benefiting women

A

intermediate; based on role stereotypes not allowed, but ones designed to remedy past discrimination and differences in opportunity will be allowed

93
Q

Level of scrutiny for alienage classifications

A

Strict scrutiny, except: 1) alienage classifications that concern self-government and democratic process (e.g., voting, jury, police officer, teacher at primary/secondary school, probation officer) - rational basis; 2) Congressional discrimination against aliens - rational basis; 3) discrimination against undocumented alien children - seemingly intermediate

94
Q

Level of scrutiny for discrimination against non-marital kids

A

intermediate; laws denying benefit to all non-marital kids, but grant to all marital children always unconstitutional; benefit to some marital kids but not non-marital - intermediate (interest in preventing fraud)

95
Q

When is rational basis review used?

A

Any other law not previously covered (e.g., age, disability, wealth discrimination as well as economic regs and sexual orientation discrimination)

96
Q

Types of content-based restrictions on speech

A

1) subject matter restrictions (application of law depends on topic of message - e.g., protest allowed if labor related, otherwise not); 2) viewpoint restrictions (application of law depends on ideology of message - e.g., pro-war allowed, anti-war not)

97
Q

Level of scrutiny for content base regs

A

strict

98
Q

What is a content neutral law regulating speech?

A

if law applies to all speech the same no matter the content

99
Q

Level of scrutiny for content neutral regulation

A

intermediate

100
Q

Prior restraint

A

Judicial or administrative system for stopping speech before it occurs

101
Q

Level of scrutiny for court orders suppressing speech (as prior restraint)

A

strict scrutiny, however, procedurally proper court orders must be complied with until vacated or overturned…person who violates it barred from later challenging it

102
Q

Ability of government to require license for speech (as prior restraint)

A

only if important reason for licensing and clear criteria leaving almost no discretion to licensing authority. Must contain procedural safeguards such as prompt determination of requests for licenses and judicial review

103
Q

Vagueness

A

law unconstitutionally vague if a reasonable person cannot tell what speech is prohibited and what is allowed

104
Q

Overbreadth

A

law unconstitutionally overbroad if it regulates substantially more speech than constitution allows to be regulated

105
Q

Fighting word laws

A

Unconstitutionally vague and overbroad

106
Q

Symbolic speech

A

conduct that communicates

107
Q

When can government regulate symbolic speech?

A

Government can regulate such conduct if it has an important interest unrelated to suppression of message and if impact on communication no greater than necessary to achieve the government’s purpose

108
Q

Is anonymous speech protected?

A

yes

109
Q

Protection of government speech

A

Cannot be challenged as violating First Amendment

110
Q

Regulation of political donations

A

contribution limits to one candidate ok, expenditure limits not

111
Q

Is burning a flag protected?

A

yes

112
Q

Draft card burning protected?

A

no

113
Q

Nude dancing protected?

A

no

114
Q

burning a cross protected?

A

protected unless done with intent to threaten

115
Q

Speech not/less protected under 1st A

A

1) incitement of illegal activity; 2) obscenity and sexually oriented speech; 3) commercial speech; 4) defamation

116
Q

What is obscene/sexually oriented non-protected speech?

A

1) appeals to prurient interest (shameful or morbid interest in sex) - community std; 2) patently offensive - community std; 3) taken as whole, lacks serious redeeming artistic, literary, political, or scientific value - national std

117
Q

What is obscene/sexually oriented non-protected speech?

A

1) prurient interest

118
Q

Can government use zoning ordinances to regulate location of adult bookstores and movie theaters?

A

yes

119
Q

Ability to regulate child porn

A

may be completely banned, even if not obscene. Child porn = children used in production of material (if CGI or adults dressed as kids, then not porn)

120
Q

Ability to regulate private possession of obscene materials

A

government may not punish private possession of obscene materials but may punish private possession of child porn

121
Q

Is profane and indecent speech protected under 1st A?

A

generally, yes. Exceptions: over broadcast media; in schools

122
Q

Types of commercial speech that can be prohibited or are not protected

A

1) advertising for illegal activity, and false and deceptive ads not protected; 2) true commercial speech that inherently risks deception can be prohibited

123
Q

Level of scrutiny for regulation of commercial speech

A

intermediate scrutiny (must be narrowly tailored but doesn’t need to be least restrictive alternative)

124
Q

Defamation of public official or one running for public office, or a public figure

A

falsity of statement plus actual malice. Malice is either defendant knew false or reckless

125
Q

Defamation of private figure and matter of public concern

A

falsity of statement plus at least negligence on part of defendant

126
Q

Can government punish for truthful reporting of information lawfully obtained from government?

A

no, even if media broadcasts a tape of illegally intercepted call if media didn’t participate in illegality and it involves matter of public importance

127
Q

Is speech by government employees on the job in performance of duties protected?

A

no

128
Q

Government restrictions based on content of speech must meet what scrutiny standard?

A

strict

129
Q

Places available for speech

A

public forums; designated public forums; limited public forums; non-public forums; private property

130
Q

Government reg of speech in public forums

A

must be subject matter and viewpoint neutral AND regs must be a time, place or manner regulation that serves an important government purpose and leaves open adequate alternative places for communication (need not be least restrictive alternative but must be narrowly tailored - intermediate scrutiny), city officials cannot have discretion to set permit fees for public demonstrations; if not neutral then strict scrutiny must be met

131
Q

Public forum

A

government properties that government constitutionally required to make available for speech. E.g., sidewalks and parks

132
Q

Designated public forums

A

government properties that government could close to speech, but chooses to open to speech. E.g., public school facilities on evenings and weekends

133
Q

Government reg of speech in designated public forums

A

same as public forums

134
Q

Non-public forums

A

government properties that government constitutionally can and does close to speech (e.g., military bases, areas outside jails, sidewalks on post office property, airports)

135
Q

Government reg of speech in non-public forums

A

Can regulate speech so long as regulation is reasonable and viewpoint neutral

136
Q

First amendment right of access to private property for speech

A

none

137
Q

Scrutiny of laws that prohibit or punish group membership (freedom of association)

A

strict scrutiny

138
Q

To punish membership in a group it must be proven that the person:

A

1) actively affiliated with group; 2) knowing its illegal activities; 3) with specific intent of furthering those activities

139
Q

Level of scrutiny for laws that require disclosure of group membership

A

Where such disclosure would chill association must meet strict scrutiny

140
Q

Laws that prohibit a group from discriminating are:

A

constitutional unless interfere with intimate association or expressive activity (e.g., dinner party or member of Nazi party)

141
Q

Can free exercise clause be used to challenge neutral law of general applicability?

A

no (e.g., peyote)

142
Q

Can government deny benefits to individuals who quit jobs for religious reasons?

A

no

143
Q

Establishment clause

A

Government can make no law establishing a religion

144
Q

Test for laws under establishment clause (Lemon Test)

A

(SEX) - 1) must be a SECULAR purpose for law; 2) primary EFFECT must be neither to advance nor inhibit religion; 3) can’t be eXcessive entanglement with religion

145
Q

Level of scrutiny for government discrimination of religious speech or among religions

A

Strict

146
Q

Constitutionality of government sponsored religious activity in public schools

A

Unconstitutional BUT religious student and community groups must have same access to school facilities as non-religious groups AND government may give assistance to parochial schools so long as not used for religious instruction, also may provide parents with vouchers to use in parochial schools