Constitutional Law Flashcards
Con: What are the two types of restrictions on free speech? What level of scrutiny?
- Content-Based (subject matter & viewpoint): strict scrutiny
- Content-Neutral: intermediate scrutiny
Con: What level of scrutiny for court orders suppressing speech?
Strict
Con: What level of review for license requirement for speech?
Must be an important reason for licensing and clear criteria that leaves virtually no discretion to the licensing authority.
Con: When is a law regarding speech unconstitutionally vague?
When a reasonable person can’t tell what speech is permitted and what is prohibited
Con: When is a law regarding speech unconstitutionally overbroad?
When it restricts substantially more speech than the Constitution allows to be regulated
Con: How are fighting words laws characterized?
Unconstitutionally vague and overbroad
Con: Under what circumstances can the government regulate conduct that has a communicative message?
Where the government has an important interest that is not related to suppressing the message and the impact on communication is no greater than nec’y to achieve the gov’t purpose.
Flag Burning - protected // Nude dancing - protected // Burning cross - protected, unless intent to threaten
Con: Can the government compel speech?
No, that is unconstitutional
Con: What is standard with respect to communication that may excite illegal activity?
Unprotected if there is a substantial likelihood of imminent illegal activity and speech is directed at causing that activity
Con: What type of “obscene” speech is less protected?
- Appeals to prurient interest
- patently offensive under the law prohibiting it
- Taken as a whole, the material lacks serious redeeming artistic, literary, political or scientific value
Con: What is rule on zoning ordinances and adult bookstores / movie theaters?
Gov’t is permitted to use zoning to regulate their location
Con: What is level of scrutiny for restricting commercial speech? What are the exceptions?
Intermediate: Gov’t regulation must be narrowly tailored to serve an important gov’t interest. Exceptions for:
- False/Deceptive ads
- Ads for illegal activities
- Professional advertising / practicing under trade name
- Prohibiting atty’s from in person solicitation of clients for profit
Con: What is a public official / politician / public figure (e.g., celebrity) required to show in order to recover in a defamation action?
- Statement was false
- Made with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth
Con: What is a private figure required to show in order to recover in a defamation action that relates to a matter of public concern?
- Statement was false
- Defendant was negligent
- Punitive damages require actual malice
Con: What is a private figure required to show in order to recover in a defamation action that DOES NOT relate to a matter of public concern?
- Statment was false
- Defendant negligent
- Don’t need actual malice to recover punitive damages
Con Law: Is speech of a gov’t figure in the performance of their duties protected?
No
Con: What is a public forum, and what type of speech regulation is permitted?
- Gov’t property that are constitutionally required to be made available for speech: sidewalks and parks are classics
- Regulations must be neutral as to subject matter and viewpoint
- Otherwise, a special form of strict scrutiny: must be a time/place/manner regulation that serves an important gov’t purpose and leaves available open adequate alternative places for communication
Con: What is a designated public forum, and what type of speech regulation is permitted?
- Properties that the gov’t COULD close to the public but chooses not do (e.g., schools)
- Same rules as public forums apply
Con: What is limited public forum, and what type of speech regulation is permitted?
- Gov’t properties that are limited to certain groups or dedicated to the discussion of only some subjects
- Gov’t CAN regulate speech as long as the regulation is reasonable and viewpoint neutral.
Con: What is a non-public forum, and what type of speech regulation is permitted?
- Gov’t properties that it can and does close to speech (e.g., areas outside prisons, post office, airports, polling places)
- Gov’t CAN regulate speech as long as the regulation is reasonable and viewpoint neutral.
Con: What is the standard of review for laws that prohibit people from gathering as a group?
Special form of strict scrutiny: government must demonstrate that the regulated actor actively affiliated with the group, knows of its illegal activities, and joined with the specific intent of furthering those activities.
Con: What is standard on disclosure of group membership?
Strict scrutiny, if the disclosure would chill association
Con: Can government prohibit a group form discriminating?
Yes, unless that interferes with intimate association (e.g., small dinner party) or expressive activity (e.g., neo nazi party)
Con: What is a key limit on a person’s right to invoke the free exercise clause?
Free Exercise clause cannot be used to challenge a neutral law of general applicability