Constitutional Law Flashcards

1
Q

JUSTICIABLE CASE OR CONTROVERSY

A

Federal courts may hear based on law-based federal jurisdiction from Constitution, federal laws and treaties, admiralty and maritime law

Example sentence: Federal courts can hear cases involving disputes related to federal laws or treaties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Standing

A

I must show ‘personal stake.’ 1) [l’s actual or imminent injury, 2) causation, 3) redressability

No ‘injury’ to taxpayers (unless litigating tax bill or fed taxpayer challenging spending 1A religious grounds), legislators, Constitution lovers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ripeness

A

Il must show harm or imminent threat of harm. Proposed law or action not yet taken are not real cases or controversies

Example: A lawsuit challenging a law that has not been implemented yet would be considered premature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mootness

A

A case is moot if the dispute has been resolved (i.e., there is no redressability), unless ‘capable of repetition, yet evading review’

Example: A case about a temporary issue that may reoccur in the future can still be considered moot.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Political Q

A

Fed court will not take issues involving a matter for another branch of gov’t that the judicial process is inherently incapable of resolving and enforcing

Example: Federal courts will not get involved in disputes that are better suited for the legislative or executive branches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Abstention

A

Fed court will abstain (defer to state courts) if claim is based on an undecided issue of state law

Example: Federal courts may choose to let state courts handle cases that involve unresolved state law issues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Delegation power

A

Congress can delegate powers it possesses and create an agency with legislative power to make rules. Intelligible guidelines for carrying out concrete objectives are required

Example: Congress can assign certain powers to agencies to regulate specific industries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Property power

A

Regulate and dispose of federal property, including Indian property and wild animals.

Example sentence: Congress has the power to regulate the use of federal lands.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Speech and debate clause

A

A member of Congress (+ aides) cannot be punished for anything said on legislative floor.

Additional information: This clause is designed to protect free speech within the legislative branch.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impeachment power

A

Congress can remove the president, federal judges, and federal officials through impeachment.

Example sentence: Impeachment is a constitutional process to hold government officials accountable for their actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Appropriations power

A

Congress can pass a bill to direct how the president must spend money.

Additional information: This power allows Congress to control the federal budget.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Earmarking funds

A

Executive branch must spend the funds, or obtain Congress approval to refuse spending.

Example sentence: Earmarking funds ensures that specific projects receive funding as intended by Congress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Congressional authorization 3-prong test

A

Where the president acts with Congress’s express/implied authority, his power is at its apex, and his action is likely valid. Where Congress is silent, the president’s action is upheld as long as the act does not take over another branch’s powers or prevent another branch from performing its tasks. Where the president acts against Congress’s express will, he has little authority, and his action is likely invalid.

Additional information: This test helps determine the extent of the president’s power when acting in conjunction with Congress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Chief executive domestic powers (EAR PVPs)

A

Continuing public office & sign. Discretion to minister/enforce laws. Enforcement of laws, not making them. May delegate to other executive officers. Attorney general is chief law-enforcement official. May direct federal executive agencies (executive orders) but not private parties outside the executive branch unless authorized by Congress. May set up presidential advisory commissions.

Additional information: These powers are related to the president’s role in enforcing domestic laws and overseeing executive functions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Appointment power

A

President can appoint officers and high-level officials with consent of Senate.

Example sentence: The president nominates individuals for key government positions subject to Senate confirmation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Removal power

A

President can remove high-level, purely executive officials without cause. President may be able to remove other executive officials for good cause based on statute (e.g., corruption, incompetence).

Additional information: The president’s removal power allows for the dismissal of certain executive branch officials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Pardon power (plenary)

A

President may grant pardons before charge or after conviction to federal criminals.

Additional information: The pardon power is a unique authority of the president to grant clemency in criminal cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the veto power in relation to proposed legislation?

A

Proposed legislation becomes law unless wholly vetoed within 10 days of passing legislation.

Example sentence: The President vetoed the proposed legislation, preventing it from becoming law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the line-item veto?

A

The line-item veto is unconstitutional. The President may only approve or reject a bill in its entirety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the absolute privilege regarding national security secrets?

A

There is an absolute privilege to refuse to disclose national security secrets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the hierarchy of laws in the United States?

A

U.S. Constitution > treaty / federal statute (last in time prevails) > executive agreement (foreign) / executive order > state constitution > state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the Supremacy Clause?

A

The Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine?

A

Under case law, Congress (and likely executive orders) cannot make state legislatures pass a law or require state executive officials (e.g., police) to enforce federal law. Mere prohibitions are not commandeering.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the Dormant Commerce Clause?

A

States may not regulate interstate commerce in a way that is discriminatory or unduly burdensome. If a state law does discriminate on its face against out-of-state actors, it is invalid unless it serves an important noneconomic state interest with no reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What is the State Action Requirement?
The Constitution generally protects against governmental action at any level (federal, state, local), not actions of private individuals (except 13A), unless there is significant state involvement.
26
What are the Standards of Scrutiny?
Strict Scrutiny (SS) requires the government to prove its classification is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest. Intermediate Scrutiny (IS) requires the government to prove its classification is substantially related to an important government interest. Rational Basis (RB) requires the plaintiff to prove the classification is not
27
Strict scrutiny
Gov't must prove its classification is necessary if it is the least-restrictive means or is narrowly tailored to serve the compelling gov't interest
28
Intermediate scrutiny
Gov't must prove its classification is substantially related to an important gov't interest
29
Rational basis
Plaintiff must prove classification is not rationally related to any legitimate gov't interest
30
Procedural DPC
Protects persons against intentional deprivation of life, liberty or property w/o due process of law ## Footnote All people including aliens and corporations, not just citizens
31
Matthews balancing factors
Factors to determine what adequate process is due when life, liberty, or property entitlement is taken: (1) importance of interest to the person, (2) gov't interest/burden in efficiency ( more burdensome to get protection > less processed needed) 3. Value of procedural safeguards (more likely that government will make an mistake without procedural protection > more process needed) Do process rights may be waived if voluntarily and made knowingly
32
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Gov't may not infringe fundamental rights
Campared Stove Test (Strict Scrutiny)
33
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Contracting (privacy)
State cannot prohibit distribution of contraceptives, whether single or married (Strict Scrutiny)
34
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Abortion (privacy)
No longer fundamental right (Dobbs). Regulation passed onto states. SS not applicable.
35
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Parental consent/ judicial bypass
24-hour waiting period, ban on unsafe method not undue burden
36
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Post-viability
Must have exceptions to protect mother's life or health
37
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Marriage (privacy)
Right to enter into (and likely to dissolve) marriage is deemed fundamental (Strict Scrutiny)
38
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Parental Rights (privacy)
Reproductive rights, and child rearing, care, custody, control (Strict Scrutiny)
39
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Education (Privacy)
Right to a private education, choice of public school system
40
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Relations (extended family)
Gov't cannot prohibit extended family from living together in a single household (Strict Scrutiny)
41
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Death
Right to refuse medical procedures, even if life-extending
42
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Sexual orientation (strict RBR)
Gov't cannot criminalize same-sex sexual activity (no legitimate interest) (Rational Basis Review)
43
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Travel
Right to travel interstate and set up residency in a new state, subject to reasonable restrictions
44
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Obscene material
Right to possess in one's home. No right to buy, sell, transport
45
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Vote
Total ban on picking/voting for a candidate; e.g., redistricting primarily based on race? (Strict Scrutiny)
46
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Regulation of process
Voting districts, such as water storage district where voting limited to landowners (Rational Basis Review)
47
Substantive Due Process Clause (DPC) - Free association
First Amendment: Right to belong to political groups (Strict Scrutiny)
48
Takings Clause
- Gov't may not take property for public use without just compensation Applies to states via 14A
49
Takings Clause - Public use
Legitimate purpose (health, welfare, safety, aesthetic reasons)
50
Takings Clause - Just compensation
Loss of FMV to owner, not gain to taker (not improved if worthless property)
51
Takings Clause - Regulation vs. taking
Regulation does not require compensation
52
Takings Clause - Actual/physical taking
If gov't takes one's property by actual or physical appropriation, it is a taking
53
Takings Clause - Temporary taking
Not a per se taking. Balance the circumstances
54
Takings Clause - Regulatory taking
Regulation that decreases value of property.
55
Takings Clause - Penn Central balancing test
Economic impact, extent to which regulation interferes with distinct investment-backed expectations, character of the government action
56
Equal Protection Clause (EPC) - Applies to states via 14A and to fed via 5A
Gov't cannot treat similarly situated people in a dissimilar manner
57
Equal Protection Clause (EPC) - Race discrimination
De jure (by law) gov't segregation almost always unconstitutional (Strict Scrutiny)
58
Equal Protection Clause (EPC) - Affirmative action
Overt classifications may pass SS (Strict Scrutiny)
59
Equal Protection Clause (EPC) - Alienage discrimination
State may require citizenship for jobs that directly affect policies
60
Equal Protection Clause (EPC) - Gender discrimination -
IS (gov't must show "exceedingly persuasive justification")
61
Affirmative action:
remedy past discrimination (Intermediate Scrutiny)
62
Privileges & Immunities Clauses
- Applies to out-of-state discrimination against citizens only
63
Privileges & Immunities Clauses - Article IV comity clause (basic rights)
State gov’t cannot discriminate against non-residents of the state if economic discrimination affects “fundamental rights” or “important economic activities,” unless the discrimination is closely related to a substantial gov’t interest (Intermediate Scrutiny)
64
Privileges & Immunities Clauses - Non-resident discrimination
Cannot affect rights including civil liberties and right to work and pursue livelihood, e.g., higher license fees or taxes for out-of-staters, abortions or employment for locals only
65
Privileges & Immunities Clauses - 14th Amendment
State cannot deny citizen rights of national citizenship, e.g., to travel state lines and establish residency in a new state
66
Privileges & Immunities Clauses - N/A to aliens and corporations
N/A to aliens and corporations (“persons”). But can protect from discrimination via DCC, 14A DPC, or 14A EPC
67
Scrutiny Levels - Strict Scrutiny (SS)
Race, alienage (state), national origin, voting, domestic travel, most SDPC rights, DCC (discriminate on face)
68
Scrutiny Levels - Intermediate Scrutiny (IS)
Gender, illegitimacy, undocumented alien children, P&I under Article IV
69
Scrutiny Levels - Rational Basis Review (RB/RBR)
Age, alienage (fed), disability, sexual orientation, social, economic, all else (non-suspect classifications (EPC) or non-fundamental rights (DPC))
70
Retroactive Legislation - Contracts clause
Prohibits state legislation from substantially impairing the obligation of existing public/private K
71
Retroactive Legislation - Contracts clause EXCEPTION
Regulation of private K is reasonably and narrowly tailored to promote important and legitimate public interest. Regulation of public K receives stricter scrutiny.
72
Retroactive Legislation - Ex post facto law
State/fed may not retroactively alter criminal offense or punishment that puts Δ in worse position
73
Retroactive Legislation - Bill of attainder
State/fed may not pass a legislative act that inflicts punitive punishment without a trial on named individuals or an easily ascertainable group for past conduct
74
First Amendment (IA) - Free speech clause
(speech includes words, symbols, expressive conduct intended and received)
75
First Amendment (IA) - Restricts gov't regulation of private speech
Does not constrain gov't from voicing its opinions or funding its own private speech, subject to other Constitutional limitations
76
First Amendment (IA) - Facial attacks on speech regulation
Analyze these first when expression is being regulated
77
Facial attacks on speech regulation - Prior restraint
Gov't action restricting speech before it occurs (rather than punishing after) is disfavored. Such restriction must be narrowly drawn and show special societal harm will result.
78
Facial attacks on speech regulation - Overbreadth
Ordinance invalid as overbroad if it prohibits activities that may be constitutionally forbidden and also those that may be protected under IA (allowed under narrower standard)
79
Facial attacks on speech regulation - Vagueness
Regulation is void as vague if ordinance is so unclear that reasonable individuals would have to guess at its meaning and would differ as to its application
80
Facial attacks on speech regulation - Unfettered discretion
A regulation cannot give officials unfettered discretion over determining speech issues (e.g., gov't no license permit fee, or require review). There must be defined standards.
81
First Amendment (IA) - Content-based regulations - Strict scrutiny triggered if gov't regulates content- or viewpoint-based speech
Few restrictions on content of speech, but there are unprotected speech EXCEPTIONS: Obscenity, defamation, unlawful advocacy, hostile audience, fighting words, true threats
82
Content-based regulations - Obscenity
Regulation valid only if the work 1) appeals to prurient (sexual) interest based on local community standards, 2) depiction or description is patently offensive to local standards, 3) as a whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political, scientific (LAPS) value to a reasonable person
83
Content-based regulations - Defamation
See Defamation in Torts. Majestic Acts. Additional constitutional issues apply for public matters: falsity and fault. Public info may be protected if newsworthy and no other protected interests are advanced.
84
Content-based regulations - Unlawful advocacy
May prohibit if the speaker (subjectively) intends to produce “imminent, unlawful action” + speech is (objectively) likely in fact to produce “imminent, unlawful action”.
85
Content-based regulations - Hostile audience
Speech eliciting imminent, violent reaction from the crowd. But police must make reasonable efforts to protect the speaker.
86
Content-based regulations - Fighting words
Likely to incite ordinary citizen to acts of immediate, violent retaliation to speaker
87
Content-based regulations - True threats
Intended to convey serious threat of bodily harm (e.g., cross burning to intimidate)
88
First Amendment (IA) - Content-neutral regulation / time, place, manner (TPM) regulation
Regulation of public forums (historically open to speech-related activities, e.g., sidewalk, park) and designated public forums (not historically open to speech but designated for it, e.g., classroom for after-school civic activities) must be content- and viewpoint-neutral + narrowly tailored (no total bans) to serve an important interest + leave open alternate channels of communication (most legitimate interest means important standard)
89
Content-neutral regulation - Limited public forums
Not historically linked to speech but open for a purpose, e.g., school gym for town debate) and non-public forums (not open to public, e.g., military base, school) is generally not TPM regulated only if viewpoint-neutral + reasonably related to a legitimate interest
90
Content-neutral regulation - Quasi-protected speech
Commercial speech is protected if it 1) is not false or deceptive and 2) does not relate to unlawful activity. But gov’t can still regulate it if it 1) serves a substantial gov’t interest + 2) directly advances that interest + 3) narrowly tailored to achieve that interest (reasonable fit b/w goals and means).
91
Freedom of religion - Establishment clause
Prohibits gov't from preferring one religion over another or establishing a religion
92
Establishment clause -
If regulation on its face discriminates or prefers a religion, or prefers religion generally over non-religion → SS. If speech is involved, can also raise viewpoint discrimination
93
Establishment clause - If law or program is facially neutral
(no sect preference), the coercion test is a factor (2022 Kennedy decision) Gov’t cannot coerce support or participation in religion against one's will (e.g., broadcasting prayer during school graduation or football game, exception to participate). There are three formal criteria. Consider extent of supervision and social pressures (psychological coercion). 1) Previously, valid under Lemon test if it has 1) secular (nonreligious) purpose, 2) primary effect that does not advance or inhibit religion, 3) no excessive gov’t entanglement with religion. Kennedy “abandoned” Lemon but did not formally overrule it. Confident test holds. Gov’t financial assistance to defined class of persons is valid if the class is defined w/o reference to religion or religious criteria (even if recipients use the aid to attend religious school).
94
Freedom of religion - Free exercise clause
Gov’t may not prohibit the free exercise of any religion
95
Free exercise clause - Genuine belief (threshold issue)?
Sincere religious beliefs are absolutely protected. The belief must parallel orthodox religious beliefs; it cannot be a purely political or philosophical view.
96
Free exercise clause - Generally applicable?
Gov’t may regulate (under RB) an activity if the regulation is neutral w/r/t religion and is of general applicability, even if it incidentally burdens religious exercise. EXCEPTION: If person quits job for sincere religious reason, gov’t cannot refuse unemployment benefits.
97
Free exercise clause - If law is not generally applicable and was motivated by intent to interfere with religion → SS
EXCEPTIONS: Sabbath observance (unemployment benefits), Amish (no schooling at 16).