Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

LA Bar > Constitutional Law > Flashcards

Constitutional Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards
1
Q

Takings Clause

A

the 5th amendment of the Constitution is applicable to the States through the Due Process Clause of the 14th amendment

the 5th amendment provides that the government may not take private property for public use without just compensation.

Analysis:
(1) whether the state action was a taking
(2) whether the taking was for a public purpose
(3) whether the owner is entitled to just compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Equal Protection Clause

A

prohibits states from unreasonable discrimination

Step 1: is there a suspect class? (race, national origin, alienage, gender (quasi))

Step 2: is there a fundamental right?

Step 3: is the law facially discriminatory or does it have discriminatory intent?

IF YES –> apply strict scrutiny (or intermediate scrutiny for gender)

If NO –> apply rational basis test
(economic is always rational, presumption of constitutionality)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Separation of Church and State

A

generally, a state is entitled to regulate conduct even if there is an incidental effect of religious practices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Free Exercise Clause

A

Government cannot punish conduct just because it is religious/displays a religious belief, and cannot punish someone based on their religious belief

Step 1: is there a sincerely held religious belief?
Step 2: is the belief burdened by regulations?
Step 3: if yes, state must show both:
(a) regulation is narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest (strict scrutiny), and
(b) fulfillment of the state’s goal would be substantially hindered without regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Establishment Clause

A

government must remain neutral in religious matters

government cannot directly/indirectly coerce individuals to exercise or refrain from exercising religious

government cannot have sect preference

government cannot discriminate for/against religious organizations when it comes to benefits/use of state property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Establishment Clause: Schools

A

school sponsored religious activities violate establishment clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Establishment Clause: Test

A

1) is the regulation neutral as to religion/sect preference?

2) what was the founders’ understanding and does it accord with history?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Commerce Clause

A

congress is specifically authorized by the constitution to regulate interstate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

states can regulate any aspect not regulated by congress as long as it does not intend or cause discrimination against out of state competition to benefit local economic interests and is not unduly burdensome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DCC: Test

A

Darla Is Really Ugly
Discriminatory intent or effect? Facial/intentional discrimination automatically triggers heightened scrutiny (invalid unless it furthers important noneconomic state interest + no reasonable alternative is available)
Nondiscriminatory/no intent (invalid only if burden on interstate commerce outweighs the promotion of legitimate local interests)

(necessary for) Important state interest?

Reasonable alternatives?

Unduly burden interstate commerce? (purpose of law, substantial burden, does the burden outweigh a legitimate local interest?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DCC: Market Participant Exception

A

state can favor its own citizens when acting as a market participant by buying/selling goods, hiring labor, giving subsidies

state can discriminate if traditional government function and likely motivated by legitimate objectives (ex: waste disposal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rational Basis Test

A

rationally related to a legitimate government interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rational Basis Test

A

rationally related to a legitimate government interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause

A

prohibits states from intentionally discriminating against nonresidents in commercial activity without substantial justification

must be for a PROTECTIONIST purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Rational Basis Test

A

rationally related to a legitimate government interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause: Test

A

Step 1: is the party a citizen of another state? (corp is not, alien is not, does not apply to citizens of state that issued the reg)

Step 2: does the statute burden a fundamental right? (right to travel, right to conduct business/carry on a trade, own property)

Step 3: is the statute intentionally protectionist?

Step 4: is there substantial justification for the differential treatment? (nonresident caused or contributed to problem state is trying to solve; no less restrictive means; no legitimate state interests)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Rational Basis Test

A

rationally related to a legitimate government interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Rational Basis Test

A

rationally related to a legitimate government interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Substantive Due Process

A

due process clause of the 14th amendment prohibits states from depriving a person from life, liberty, or property without due process of law

laws must be reasonable and not arbitrary

determination of whether a law is reasonable depends on implication of a fundamental right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Substantive Due Process: Test

A

Step 1: does it implicate a suspect class or a fundamental right?

if yes –> strict scrutiny
if no –> rational basis (commercial activity/economic always rational basis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Procedural Due Process

A

a person whose property interest is affected by state action is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard before a neutral decision-maker (before deprivation of stuff by state, notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard must be given)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Procedural Due Process: Test

A

Step 1: was there a state actor?

Step 2: is there a protected liberty interest or property interest? (must be “vested”)

Step 3: was there adequate notice? Was there a meaningful opportunity to be heard before a neutral decision-maker, tailored to the deprivation in question?

Step 4: how much process is due? (would procedure have reduced risk of deprivation, historical abuse of rights, what are common law safeguards)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Vagueness

A

under the Due Process Clause, laws must make clear what is prohibited, especially as applied to laws regulating speech

vague laws are in violation of the Due Process Clause

regulation is unconstitutional if it fails to provide:
reasonable notice of what is prohibited
minimal guidelines to discourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Takings Clause

A

Applies to states via 14th amendment and federal government via 10th amendment

Test:
1) private property taken or land use regulation?
physical occupation and denial of all/substantially all rights in land = taking
zoning ordinances usually not a taking
regulations that impair use of property if do not meet rational basis test
is adverse impact of regs roughly proportional to loss caused to property owner?

2) was the taking for a public purpose? (give deference to state, public purpose = rational basis test)

3) was there just compensation?
(paid from time use of property is denied)

28
Q
A
29
Q
A
30
Q

Contracts Clause

A

states cannot pass laws that retroactively impair contractual rights

does NOT apply to federal (use substantive due process instead)

public v. private contracts
indirect consequences on private contracts does not matter, must “substantially impair”
public –> state cannot undo its own contracts

31
Q

Contracts Clause

A

states cannot pass laws that retroactively impair contractual rights

does NOT apply to federal (use substantive due process instead)

public v. private contracts
indirect consequences on private contracts does not matter, must “substantially impair”
public –> state cannot undo its own contracts

32
Q

Supremacy Clause

A

the constitution provides that federal law is supreme

state laws that are preempted by federal law are invalid

state laws may be preempted by federal law in two ways:
(1) express preemption
(2) implied preemption
(a) field preemption
(b) conflict preemption

THERE IS A PRESUMPTION AGAINST PREEMPTION

33
Q

Field Preemption

A

scheme of federal regulation is so pervasive as to make reasonable that congress meant for there to be no reason for states to supplant it

34
Q
A
34
Q
A
34
Q
A
35
Q

Conflict Preemption

A

state policy may present a result inconsistent with the objective of the federal statute

36
Q
A
36
Q
A
36
Q
A
37
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

38
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

39
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

40
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

41
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

42
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

43
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

44
Q
A
45
Q
A
46
Q
A
47
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest

use when facially discriminatory or discriminatory intent

48
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

substantially related to an important state interest

49
Q

Rational Basis Test

A

rationally related to a legitimate state interest

presumption of constitutionality

use for economic regulations

50
Q

Overbreadth

A

statute is unconstitutionally overbroad if it restricts protected speech as well as unprotected speech

first amendment

51
Q

First Amendment: Free Speech

A

the first amendment is applicable to the states through the due process clause of the 14th amendment, which prohibits the government from abridging the freedom of speech

52
Q

Free Speech: Test

A

1) does the regulation involve regulation of content or conduct of speech?

2) CONTENT: what kind of speech does the regulation involve? (commercial? gov’t employee? political? obscenity?)

3) CONDUCT: does the regulation involve symbolic speech, time/place manner, or a public forum?

4) is the regulation “prior restraint”?

53
Q

What is “speech”?

A

speech is a broad concept that includes words, symbols (symbolic speech), and expressive conduct

must be expressing a message

54
Q

What is “speech”?

A

speech is a broad concept that includes words, symbols (symbolic speech), and expressive conduct

must be expressing a message

55
Q

Commercial Speech

A

protected by the first amendment so long as it is “truthful” and not deceptive

intermediate scrutiny for regs regulating commercial speech

56
Q

Forum Rules

A

the extent to which government may regulate speech or expressive conduct on government property depends on whether the property involved is a public forum, a designated public form, a limited public forum, or a nonpublic forum

public forum: government property historically open for speech
Must be: content neutral AND strict scrutiny

limited public forum: government property used for other purposes, ex: football field
Must be: content neutral AND rational basis

nonpublic forum: private
Must be: content neutral AND rational basis

*SCHOOLS: may limit speech for a “legitimate pedagogical concern” (ex: social media distraction)

57
Q

Political Speech

A

highest degree of protection under 1st amendment (PROTECTS FALSE POLITICAL SPEECH TOO)

government may not regulate political speech unless regulation meets strict scrutiny

Exception:
1) political speech advocating illegal or criminal acts, and
2) likely to incite or produce such action (how serious is conduct, influence of speaker, who is listening, where is speech occurring, aggravating circumstances)
think trump on jan 6

58
Q

Political Speech

A

highest degree of protection under 1st amendment

government may not regulate political speech unless regulation meets strict scrutiny

Exception:
1) political speech advocating illegal or criminal acts, and
2) likely to incite or produce such action (how serious is conduct, influence of speaker, who is listening, where is speech occurring, aggravating circumstances)
think trump on jan 6

59
Q

Speech by Public Employees

A

right of a public employee to speak must be balanced against the state’s interest in efficiently performing state functions

Test:
1) speech must relate to a matter of public concern (private speech is not protected in public workplace)

2) government must show that its interest in efficiently performing state functions outweighs the employee’s free speech rights
IF NOT –> 3

3) government can also justify by showing that a negative employment decision would have been reached anyone for reasons unrelated to speech (we would have fired them anyway!)

60
Q

Obscenity

A

NOT protected by 1st amendment

Test:
1) average person applying contemporary community standards would find that, taken as a whole, it appeals to the prurient interest, and
2) work depicts in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct as specifically defined by state law
3) the work as a whole lacks serious artistic value

61
Q

Prior Restraint

A

General Rule: government must wait until speech occurs before acting

heavy presumption AGAINST validity, need extreme circumstances (think spies in the newspaper)

62
Q

Content Regulation

A

regulations forbidding communication of specific ideas are presumptively unconstitutional

63
Q

Conduct Regulation

A

a court will uphold conduct regulation if it is:
1) within constitutional power of government
2) furthers important government interest
3) interest is unrelated to speech
4) regulation has an incidental burden on speech and no more than necessary

64
Q

Symbolic Speech

A

conduct to communicate an idea enjoys some first amendment protections

must promote an important government interest

indirect impact on symbolic speech is permitted

65
Q

Time/Place/Manner Restrictions

A

cannot be a thinly veiled content restriction

no unbridled discretion to disallow permits based on conduct (is the permit a pretense for content regulation?)

no greater than necessary to achieve stated government purpose

66
Q

Vagueness

A

a statute is unconstitutionally vague if it restricts 1st amendment protection but fails to provide an ascertainable standard of acceptable conduct

67
Q

Freedom of Association

A

1st amendment protects the right of people to freely assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances

freedom of association does NOT apply to non-political association that lack a sufficient degree of privacy/intimacy (ex: right of teenagers to associate in a nightclub)

68
Q

Free Exercise Clause

A

prohibits

69
Q

Establishment Clause

A

is it coercive? if yes –> only permitted if strict scrutiny

if sect preference –> only permitted if strict scrutiny

if not coercive/sect pref –> is it religiously neutral?

if neutral –> valid

if not neutral –> history/founders’ understanding of establishment clause?

70
Q

Anti-Commandeering; Federalism

A

10th amendment prohibits congress from adopting a statute that commandeers state officials by requiring that states regulate their own citizens

however - congress can regulate by prohibiting that states take certain acts (ex: prohibiting states from requiring sensitive information for drivers’ license applications)

71
Q

“Adequate and Independent” State Grounds; Justiciability

A

Supreme Court will only hear a case from state court if the state court judgment turned on federal ground s

SCOTUS will refuse jurisdiction (not justiciable) if the case was decided on “adequate and independent” state grounds

Adequate = fully dispositive of case (ie: even if federal law was applied by state court, it wouldn’t change the outcome based on state law)

Independent = interpretation of state law by state court was not based on federal law

72
Q

Standing/Mootness/Live Case or Controversy

A

standing and mootness must be met all stages of the “controversy”

live controversy must exist at all stages of review (exception: capable of repetition but evading review)

73
Q

Standing

A

1) injury in fact
2) caused by defendant’s conduct
3) redressable by relief sought

74
Q

Standing: Corporations/Organizations

A

standing to sue on behalf of members:
1) injury in fact to one or more members
2) injury is related to the organization’s purpose
3) neither the nature of the claim nor the relief requested requires participation of individual members

75
Q

11th Amendment

A

federal courts are prohibited from hearing private parties’ and foreign governments’ claims against state governments

Exceptions:
1) suits against state officials
2) state has consented (waiver of 11th amendment immunity)
3) plaintiff is United States or another state
4) congres

76
Q

Displays of Religious Symbols on Public Property

A

longstanding monuments are presumed constitutional because they likely have historical significance and their original purpose may be unclear

establishment clause

77
Q

State Action

A

“state” includes government agencies and officials acting under color of state law

can also include private individuals/organizations that:
1) perform exclusive public functions (running a town/running for election are the only two); or
2) have significant state involvement in their activities
significant involvement = state AFFIRMATIVELY facilities, encourages, or authorizes acts of discrimination

78
Q

Fundamental Rights

A

PRIVACY:
Marriage
procreation
use of contraceptives
obscene reading material
rights of parents
right to education
keeping extended family together
intimate sexual conduct
collection and distribution of personal data

VOTE

TRAVEL

BEAR ARMS (self defense)

79
Q

Campaign Contributions

A

can contribute as much as you want on your own campaign

can spend as much as you want on someone else’s campaign provided you don’t coordinate with them

LA Bar (14 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions