Constitutional Law Flashcards
What does it mean that the constitution is uncodified?
It lacks a single definitive source containing its most important rules.
What are the sources of the UK constitution?
Acts of Parliament, the common law, conventions, the ECHR via the Human Rights Act 1998.
What is the rule of law? (3)
- The law should be applied fairly.
- The government should act accordingly to the law.
- Laws should generally not have a retrospective effect.
Do the courts have a right to strike down an Act of Parliament?
No.
What is the Ram doctrine?
“Third source powers”
The powers that are entirely incidental to statutory and royal prerogative powers. They give the government powers needed to carry on the ordinary business of government which are not explicitly authorised by statue or Royal prerogative.
What are the three main principles of the UK constitution?
- Separation of power.
- Rule of law.
- Parliamentary sovereignty.
Does an Act of Parliament enacted without the consent of the House of Lords under the Parliament Acts 1911-1949 have the same legal status as an Act passed in the ordinary manner?
Yes.
When does an international treaty have domestic effect?
When it has been incorporated into domestic law through an Act of Parliament.
Can the Parliament enact legislation that has effect beyond the boundaries of the UK?
Yes.
Can the Parliament legislate retrospectively?
Yes, although it raises questions under the rule of law.
What is the enrolled bill rule?
The courts do not question the validity of legislation.
If an Act has been passed by the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and has been granted the Royal Assent, the courts will give effect to that legislation.
The courts do not consider the parliamentary process by which an Act of Parliament has been enacted.
What will happen when two Acts of Parliament are in conflict?
Courts will give effect to the later Act of Parliament.
When a direct conflict between EU law and an Act of Parliament emerged, what happened with the Act of Parliament that conflicted with the EU law?
It was ‘disapplied’.
What are the core principles of the rule of law?
- No one should be punished unless they have breached a specific law, and their punishment should be according to the law.
- No person is above the law.
What is the parliamentary privilege? (To whom does it apply?)
It applies only to the members of House of Commons and House of Lords.
There is an absolute freedom of speech within the Parliament.
What are the fundamental common law rights?
- The right of access to the courts.
- Decisions made by the government need to be made fairly and comply with the basic standard of fairness.
Who can interfere with the fundamental common law rights?
Only the Parliament through an Act of Parliament. It needs to expressly state that these fundamental rights are to be breached.
What is the Monarch’s role in the Parliament and the legislative process?
- Give King’s speech.
- Give Royal Assent.
How many members are in the House of Commons?
650
Who is excluded and banned from taking a seat in the House of Commons?
Excluded:
1. Persons under 18;
2. Citizens from non-Commonwealth countries (except for the Republic of Ireland);
3. Members of the House of Lords.
Banned (the House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975):
1. Members of the judiciary;
2. Civil servants;
3. Members of the Armed forces;
4. Members of a police force;
5. Members of parliaments or legislatures outside of the Commonwealth or Ireland.
When a recall petition is triggered?
When an MP has been:
1. Convicted of an offence and is sentenced to imprisonment;
2. Suspended by the House of Commons for 10 days for misconduct;
3. Found guilty of providing false or misleading information to their expenses.
In what circumstances does a recall petition lead to a by-election?
If more than 10% of the electorate in the constituency sign the petition.
How many members are in the House of Lords?
Around 800.
What are the categories of lords in the House of Lords?
- Hereditary peers (92);
- Life peers;
- Lords Spiritual (26);
- Law Lords (a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary).
How long does a parliamentary session last?
12 months (starts each May).
What is the significance of a parliamentary session re legislative process?
A legislative process needs to be finalised within one session (unless either the House of Commons or the House of Lords agrees to ‘carry-over’ the bill).
Who makes a decision re prorogation?
The Monarch, on the advice of the Prime Minister.
What are the stages of the legislative process?
- First reading;
- Second reading;
- Committee stage (Public Bill Committee or Committee of the Whole House);
- Report Stage
- Third reading;
- Consideration of amendments;
- Royal Assent.
When a bill is considered by the Commitee of the Whole House?
Uncontroversial or urgent bills or bills of first-class constitutional importance.
What is the Salisbury Convention?
If a government bill is implementing a commitment that the party elected into government made in their manifesto, then the House of Lords will grant a second reading to the bill as a matter of course and will not otherwise block the legislation.
But, the House of Lords reserve the right to make amendments to the bill at later stages in the legislative process.
What is the effect of the suspensory veto under the Parliament Acts 1911-1949?
The House of Lord cannot block legislation completely, but it can delay it.
If the House of Lords blocks a piece of legislation already passed by the House of Commons, which is then reintroduced and passed by the House of Commons in the next session of Parliament, only for the House of Lords to block it again, the bill is sent to the Monarch for Royal Assent.
What is a sunset close?
A provision stating that some provisions of all of an Act expires on a certain date.
What are the two procedures by which secondary legislation is being made?
- Negative Resolution Procedure;
- Affirmative Resolution Procedure.
What is the Negative Resolution Procedure?
A draft of secondary legislation is laid before the House of Commons and House of Lords.
It will take effect on the date stated on the draft unless within 40 days of being laid, either House votes in favour of rejecting the secondary legislation.
No amendments to the draft can be made.
What is the Affirmative Resolution Procedure?
A draft of secondary legislation is laid before the House of Commons and House of Lords, and both Houses must expressly vote in favour of the secondary legislation for it to become effective.
No amendments to the draft can be made.
Does the Parliamentary Acts 1911-1949 apply to secondary legislation?
No (the House of Lords is free to block the legislation).
What are the Henry VIII Powers?
Powers granted to government to amend primary legislation (in practice, minor amendments to legislation).
Can the court strike down secondary legislation?
Yes (secondary legislation is made by the government and not Parliament).
What is the Sub Judice Rule?
MPs and peers do not refer to cases which are currently before the courts during debates.
Under which conditions can the court use Parliamentary Debates to aid interpretation?
- Legislation is not clear;
- There is a statement from the minister that assists the court;
- The statement is sufficiently clear.
Is judical review available against a decision made by a charity?
No, judical review is available only against decisions made by public bodies.
Is judical review available when a contract exists between parties?
The matter should be resolved by private law.
What are the key stages in the judical review procedure?
- Pre-action Protocol: The claimant should send a letter to the potential defendant identifying the issue in dispute. The defendant should respond within 14 days.
-
Permission stage: The claimant applies to the court for permission to continue the claim for judical review. Usually written procedure, but there may be a hearing.
If permission is granted, the matter goes to the second stage: a full hearing.
What is the time limit for bringing a claim for judical review?
Promptly but not later than three months after the issue arose.
For planning decisions: within six weeks.
Can the court refuse the permission for judical review even if the claim was brought within the three month deadline?
Yes, if the court believes that the claim has not been made promptly.
What is the standard for assessing whether a claimant has standing for judical review?
A sufficient interest.
At which stage of judical review does the court assess standing?
At the permission stage.
If the standing issue is not obvious, then it is being considered at the full hearing.
Can a group or an association bring a claim for judical review?
Yes. If the association:
1. Is responsible;
2. Is well resourced;
3. Has expertise and/or
4. There is unlikely to be an alternative claimant.
Key issues re when a claim can be brought for judical review (3):
- Not hypothetical;
- Not factual disputes;
- Should be last resort.
What are the grounds for judical review?
- Illegality;
- Procedural impropriety;
- Unreasonableness;
- Breach of legitimate expectations.
What are the different grounds for illegality?
- Error of law;
- Specific legal duty;
- Unlawful delegation of power;
- Irrelevant considerations;
- Ultra vires
What does ‘ultra vires’ mean?
Beyond/outside the powers.
A public authority acts contrary to the Act of Parliament that grants them the power to act.
What are the ‘ouster clauses’?
Clauses that attempt to oust the jurisdiction of the court.
What is the Public Sector Equality Duty?
It requires that public authorities take into account equality considerations when making decisions.
They need to show due regard to [equality]. This means [equality] has been considered as part of the decision-making process.
What is an unlawful delegation of power?
Power once delegated cannot be delegated again without being approved by the Act of Parliament granting the power in the first place.
What are the different grounds for procedural impropriety?
- Mandatory/ directory requirements;
- Right to be heard;
- Rule against bias;
- Duty to consult (no general duty);
- Duty to give reasons (no general duty).
What are the mandatory and directory requirements?
Mandatory requirement: must be followed; a failure to follow will invalidate the decision.
Directory requirement: if not followed, it will not necessarily invalidate a decision.
Is there a general right to be heard?
Yes, but the extent of the right varies from situation to situation.
When a right is removed from a person, the person must be given the opportunity to hear the case against them and to respond.
What is the ‘natural justice’ rule against bias?
- Actual bias: present when the decision maker made a decision that is actually motivated by bias. Usually impossible to prove.
- Automatic disqualification rule: if the decision maker has a financial interest, they are automatically disqualified. If the decision maker has a non-financial interest which is so closely connected to issues raises by the decision isln question, they are also automatically disqualified.
- Apparent bias
What is the test for apparently bias?
Whether a fair-minded and informed observer, informed of the facts would conclude that there was a real possibility of bias.
Is there a general common law duty to consult?
No. But there is a duty to consult:
- When there is a statutory duty to consult;
- When there has been a promise to consult;
- When there has been an established practice of conultation;
- Exceptionally, when a failure to consult would lead to conspicuous unfairness.
Is there a general common law duty to give reasons?
No. However,
- When the subject matter or interest is important, fairness requires reasons;
- If a decision appears to be aberrant, fairness may require giving reasons.
Legitimate expectations can be based on …
- An explicit promise or assurance;
- Previous action by the public body.
When can the court give effect to a substantive legitimate expectation?
If the promise made by the public authority is particularly important and has been made only to a small number of individuals.
What is the test for irrationality / unreasonableness? (What is the standard for human rights and fundamental common law rights?)
The decision must be so outrageous in its defiance of logic or of accepted moral standards that no sensible person who applied their mind to the question could have arrived at it.
For human rights/fundamental common law rights: proportionality test.
- Is the object of the policy sufficiently important to justify limiting the fundamental right?
- Are the measures designed to meet the legislative objective rationally connected to it?
- Is the interference with the right no more than necessary to accomplish the objective?
What is a quashing order?
It renders the original decision void.
What is a mandatory order?
It orders a defendant to act in a particular manner.