constitutional changes since 1997 Flashcards

1
Q

Since 1997 there have been many reforms to the constitution

explain why the was Demand for Reform

A

Demand for reform came from a broad range of groups who wanted to modernise British institutions and a growing distrust in traditional institutions.

There were also growing demands for devolution to Scotland and to fix the problems in Northern Ireland.

When New Labour came to power in 1997 under the leadership of Tony Blair they promised wide ranging constitutional reforms.

There is still debate about whether these reforms went far enough.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

house of lords reform
key date?

A

The House of Lords Act 1999 removed all but 92 hereditary peers.

The Lords became a mainly appointed chamber, with peers appointed based on merit as opposed to by birth with the removal of most hereditary peers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

arguments supporting house of lords reform doing enough

A

Removal of the majority hereditary peers modernised the House of Lords and made it a more legitimate and professional body.

No one party has a majority.

An unelected house means that experts can be appointed.

For example, Lord Norton, a politics professor and constitutional expert.

People who can represent underrepresented groups in society can be appointed.

Lord Bird (ex-homeless man and founder of the Big Issue) represents homeless people, a group who often go unrepresented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

arguments supporting more reforms needed

A

There are still 92 hereditary peers – an idea that is outdated in a meritocratic society.

There are 26 Bishops but no representation for other religions.

Party leaders still make political appointments to the House of Lords.

The House of Lords remains unelected despite having influence over law-making and being able to hold the government to account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

arguments supporting reform was enough: life peerages

A

Life peerages mean that peers don’t have to worry about election or removal from office if they make decisions that are unpopular with their party or a small group of constituents.

Life peerages mean that Lords can, therefore, consider the long-term interests of the country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

devolution
key date?

A

In 1998 the Scotland Act, Northern Ireland Act and Government of Wales Act established the Scottish Parliament, Northern Ireland Assembly and Welsh Assembly.

There had been a growing demand for Scottish independence and a need to unite the unionist and nationalist parties in Northern Ireland.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

arguments supporting devolution did enough

A

The Good Friday agreement and devolution to the Northern Ireland Assembly transformed the situation in Northern Ireland.

Until the collapse of the power-sharing agreement in January 2017 the two main parties had been working together.

Although there are calls for more devolution to England, when a referendum was held on the idea of an elected regional assembly for the north east of England the idea was rejected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

arguments supporting more devolution is needed

A

More devolution needed

It is argued that more devolution of powers to England is needed.

The West Lothian question is the problem of Scottish MPs being able to vote in the House of Commons on matters that only affect England whilst English MPs have no say in devolved Scottish Matters.

The Barnett formula is used to determine the amount of funding per head given to each part of the UK and is out of date as it was devised in 1978.

The formula means that Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland receive more money per head than England.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

arguments supporting more devolution is needed in wales

A

There have been multiple pieces of legislation devolving further powers to Wales since 1998, in 2006, 2014 and 2017.

One of the reasons for this increased demand is the imbalance in the powers given in 1998 when Wales gained fewer powers than Scotland.

The Welsh nationalist movement has been growing and demand for further devolution continues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

arguments supporting more devolution needed in Northern Ireland

A

Since the 2016 EU referendum there have been ongoing discussions over how Brexit will work for Northern Ireland as it shares a border with the Republic of Ireland (an EU member).

The Northern Ireland Act 1998 will need to be amended as part of the Brexit process, causing possible conflict in Ireland.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

fixed term parliament act reform

A

The 2011 Fixed Term Parliaments Act set five year periods between general elections.

The Act took away the power of the prime minister to call a general election whenever they wished.

An election can only occur earlier if a two-thirds majority of MPs in the House of Commons pass a motion for an early election or if a vote of no confidence in the government is passed.

In 2017 Theresa May was able to call a general election because two-thirds of MPs voted in favour of an election.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

further devolution to wales

A

Lawmaking powers were extended to the Welsh Assembly as a result of the Government of Wales Act 2014.

The Government of Wales Act 2014 gave the Welsh government control over some taxes, such as business taxes, and included the provision for a referendum in Wales to decide whether its national government could have some control over income tax.

In 2015 the Welsh government was granted control of income tax up to £3 billion per year without requiring a referendum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

elected mayors and commissioners reform

A

The 2010-2015 coalition government introduced elected mayors in many cities across England.

The new position of police commissioners was introduced with commissioners having responsibility for policing quality across England and Wales.

Police commissioners have been elected using a supplementary vote system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

further devolution to scotland

A

In 2016 there was a further devolution of powers to Scotland which included powers over some taxes, welfare and the to vary the levels of income tax.

This devolution of financial powers to Scotland was called ‘devo-max’.

More powers were granted to Scotland in response to the increased nationalist feeling across Scotland after the 2014 independence referendum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

recall of MPs reform

A

The 2015 Recall of MPs Act gave constituencies the power to recall any MP who had acted inappropriately or misbehaved.

For an MP to be recalled, over 10% of constituents need to support a petition in favour of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

devolution outside london

A

From 2015 the Conservative government gave more powers to larger cities.

The government granted cities with financial independence by enabling them to keep revenue from business rates so they could fund local projects and policies.

In 2016 Manchester was given the power to control its own budget for social care and for healthcare which had previously been controlled by central authorities.

17
Q

human rights act 1998

A

Human Rights Act

The 1998 Human Rights Act (HRA) incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into UK law.

The freedoms contained in the ECHR include the freedoms to life, to a fair trial, of expression and from discrimination among many others.

The ECHR requires states to hold free and fair elections, abolish the death penalty, preserve family life and give foreigners the same rights as all citizens in a state.

18
Q

HRA: supreme court

A

The Human Rights Act (HRA) means that any public body cannot act in a way that would break with the convention and that the judiciary must make rulings that are compatible with it.

The Supreme Court can strike down secondary legislation that is incompatible with the HRA, but for primary legislation they can only issue a ‘Doctrine of Incompatibility’ urging parliament to change the statute, this is due to the principle of parliamentary sovereignty.

19
Q

arguments supporting human rights act did enough

A

The fundamental rights of all British Citizens are very clearly laid out in one easily accessible piece of legislation.

There was an 8-fold increase in the number of human rights cases and claims brought to the high court after the Human Rights Act was passed.

20
Q

arguments supporting more reforms are needed on HRA

A

More reform is needed

Some Conservatives resent the link to the European Court of Human Rights at Strasbourg and want to replace the HRA with a British Bill of Rights that defines certain rights more narrowly.

Despite the HRA, it is possible for the government to restrict the human rights of individuals.

In 2005 the government introduced control orders, allowing the authorities to restrict the movements of suspected terrorists.

In order to do this, they simply had to declare an exemption from Article 5 of the HRA for those who fall under suspicion.

21
Q

What did the The 2005 Constitutional Reform Act do?

A

The 2005 Constitutional Reform Act created a separate Supreme Court as the highest court of appeal in the UK. Before this, the UK’s senior judges sat in the House of Lords (known as the Law Lords).

22
Q

Constitutional Reform Act: Supreme Court

judicial reform

A

The 2005 Constitutional Reform Act has three major effects:

The Act separated the government and the judiciary.

The Act formed a Supreme Court which separated parliament from the judiciary.

The Act reformed the appointment process for senior judicial appointments.

23
Q

Constitutional Reform Act: Supreme Court
lord chancellor reform

A

The Act split the powers of the Lord Chancellor into 3 different roles as previously the holder of this position had been a member of the government, speaker of the House of Lords and head of the judiciary with the power to appoint judges.

Now the Lord Chancellor is simply a government role with the Lord Speaker presiding over the House of Lords and the Lord Chief Justice as head of the judiciary.

These reforms made the judiciary more independent.

24
Q

Constitutional Reform Act: Supreme Court
supreme court

A

The Supreme Court was formed to replace the ‘Law Lords’ as the UK’s highest court of appeal.

This reform separated parliament from the judiciary.

25
Q

Constitutional Reform Act:
appointments

A

Prior to the reforms, senior judicial appointments were made by the prime minister and Lord Chancellor, who are political figures.

The Act established a Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) to appoint candidate’s based solely on their legal qualifications and ability.

The government makes the final decision on appointments but they must be approved by the JAC.

26
Q

arguments supporting the constitutional reform act did enough

A

There is now a clear separation of the 3 branches of government which prevents abuse of power.

The judiciary is physically and constitutionally separate from the executive and legislature allowing for greater judicial independence, strengthening rule of law.

27
Q

arguments supporting the idea that the constitutional reform act was not enough

A

The Supreme Court is much weaker than its counterparts in most other liberal democracies (with codified constitutions). It cannot strike down legislation as that would weaken (or perhaps destroy) parliamentary sovereignty.

The composition of the supreme court is not very diverse, however, neither is the group of well qualified, experienced judges from which they have to choose their ranks and is a problem in the judiciary as a whole.

28
Q

Electoral reform has remained an important issue in UK politics for many years including around voting age and the electoral system:

electoral reform

A

New Labour introduced various forms of proportional representation for elections to the European Parliament, Scottish Parliament, Welsh and Northern Irish Assemblies.

The additional member system (AMS) was introduced for the Welsh Assembly and Scottish Parliament elections.

The single transferable vote (STV) was used for the Northern Irish Assembly elections.

29
Q

electoral system: AV

A

In 2011 a referendum was held on introducing the alternative vote (AV) system for general elections to parliament at Westminster.

The referendum rejected the proposed electoral reform and a first past the post system (FPTP) remains the system used.

30
Q

electoral reform:
voting age

A

The voting age for UK citizens is 18 for UK general elections.

In the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, the voting age was lowered to 16 for the first time.

There remains calls for the voting age to be lowered from 18 for all UK elections.