Constitution Amendments and Revision Process Flashcards
What amendment process was done to the constitution? What does this mean
It was patriated so entrenched aspects of constitution was made wholly domestic
How did 1982 Constitution act alter constitutions? (4)
- provided domestic amending process
- provided charter of rights
- add subsection for division of power
- conference for rights of aboriginals
Prior to 1892 _____of constitution _______ be ________ in Canada
much of constitution could be amended in Canada
What was amended prior to 1892? Section 92
provincial legislature was able to make amendments to their constitution as long as it had no effect on office of lieutenant governor
Prior to 1982 certain parts of constitution was changed through UK Parliament through extraordinary process. These included (3)
- division of power
- rights of french and english language
- statutes creating provinces
What is imperial parliament formal authority?
ruled by conventions in constitution which made it essentially an instrument of Canadian will
What 3 things did conventions require
- initiative from Canadian Government
- joint resolution of senate and house of commons
- Unanimous provincial consent or substantial consent
2 amendment formulas
General Procedure
Unanimity Provision
General Procedure: resolution of (2)
resolution of senate and house of commons
resolution of legislative assembly with 2/3 province with 50% of population called 7-50 rule
Unanimity Provision and when is it used
requires unanimous approval of all provinces and legislative assembly (10). Used for very important entrenched aspects
Important entrenched aspects for Unanimity Provisions: (5)
- monarchy and representatives
- no province has less members in house of commons than senators
- use of english and french
- Supreme court (3-quebec of the 9)
- Amending formula no change without agreement of all 11 legislatures
Two approaches to change by federal government (x2 accords)
Meech lake accord
Charlottetown accord
Meech lake accord
make change to make all change be unanimous only. Failed by manitoba and newfoundland
Charlottetown accord
- quebec never approved
- Mulroney wanted Quebec in constitutional family, Quebec wanted ability to veto
- Mulroney wanted to say all provinces could have veto but then would need entire unanimity than 7/50 rule
- tried to add distinct society clause but it failed
What is the irony of flexibility in “Clarity Act”
easier for provinces to leave than amending the constitution