Constitional Law Flashcards
What are the 4 requirements or limits of Justiciability Doctrine
- Standing
- Ripeness
- Mootness
- Political Question
4 requirements of standing
- injury
- causation and redressability
- NO 3rd party
- No general grievances
STANDING
- what 2 types of injury
ex. sierra club
ex. LAPD
- Plaintiff suffers actual injury
- Plaintiff is seeking injunctive relief needs to show likelihood of future harm
ex. sierra club sued but not one member had walked on mountain they tried to protect
ex. plaintiff could not show likelihood he would be held in choke hold again
- RIPENESS: ?
- Criteria (2) ?
ex. fda
- Weather a federal court will grant pre-enforcement review of a statute
- a. hardship will be suffered without review
b. does court have all the info to render a decision
ex. fda says all drugs need generic name on label, could not prove a and b
- Mootness: ?
2. 3 exceptions:
- If events after plaintiffs lawsuit end injury the case is moot
- a. wrong capable of repeating
ex. rowe v. wadeb. Voluntary cessation
ex. co just “says” they will quite descrimantionc. class action
ex. named plaintif in suite becomes moot matter not moot as long as one in class is still being injured
What is the difference between Ripeness and Mootness?
Ripeness bars claims BEFORE they have developed
Mootness bars claims AFTER they have been resolved.
4 Political questions:?
- Republican Form of Gov.Clause
- Presidents Foreign Authority
- impeachment and removal
- partisan gerrymandering
Abstention: ?
ex. barbri
Federal courts may not enjoin pending state court proceedings.
ex. state prosecution for new statuet that makes barbari lecture illegal, the federal court may not enjoin in the middle of that trial
What does the 11th Amd. prohibit: ?
What does Sovereign Immunity prohibit:?
Suits by private party / foreign gov against states in federal court.
Suits against states in state courts even on federal statute
4 exceptions where sates may be sued:?
- Waiver
- Federal Laws / 14th Amd. (civil right matters)
- Federal Gov can sue State Gov
- Bankruptcy proceedings
11 And, prohinits _____ from hearing claims for damages against _____ unless:
a)____
b____
c)____
federal court state government (not officers)
a) consent
b) plaintiff is another state or US gov
c) congress created authority
Abstention: ?
ex. barbri
Federal courts may not enjoin pending court proceeding.
ex: state prosecution for new statute that makes teaching barbaric illegal. Federal court may not enjoin during hearing
- Congress can act act under what 2 type of powers?
2. What does Congress NOT have?
- Express or implied
2. Police power
- Presedentail Removal Power:
2. Who can the president always fire:
- Unless removal is listed by statute the president may fire any executive branch office
- Cabinet officers
- For Congress to limit Presedentila Removal ?
2. So what is the most Congress can do in regards to President removal?
- Must be an office where independence from President is desirable?
ex. like a special prosecutor - Congress can limit removal to show “good cause” but can’t prohibit
- What is Federalism?
- Preemption
- Where doe power come from
- Limit on state / local power because of national power
- laws, treaties and constitution are supreme law of the land
- Supremacy clause / Article VI
What is Implied Preemption: ?
3 ways:?
Even if a statute is silent preemption can impiled
- Mutually exclusive laws
- Impedes achievement
- Congress clear intent
- Can states tax or regulate government activity?
- What type iof immunity is this called?
ex: us banks
- NO
- Inter-Govermental Immunity
ex. states tried to tax US banks, not allowed
- Dormant Commerce Clause:
- Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV states:?
ex.
3.Privileges and Immunities Clause of 14th Amd only deals with?
ex.
4, Why is example in 3 not a matter under P and I Clause Article IV?
- A state or local law is unconstitutional if it places an UNDUE BURDEN on interstate commerce.
- No STATE may deprive an individual of another state of the Privileges and Immunities it affords its own citizens
ex. AZ cannot discriminate CA - right to travel wrong answer unless involves right to travel
ex. mississippi citizen moves to CA and told only Mississippi benefits until after a year = unconstitutional chills travel - Because Plaintiff was moving to CA not just visiting
What is the first question you always ask when dealing Dormant Commerce Clause and Privileges and Immunities Clause of IV.
ex. Trash
ex. Wine
Does the law discriminate against out of staters.
ex. Philadelphia v. NJ, no state can bring trash into NJ = violated PI of IV
ex. Minnesota wineries could sell wine via mail but out of state wineries could not + violated PI of IV.
- So what does the Privilege and Immunities Clause IV need to be triggered that Dormant Commerce Clause does not ?
- So what does the Dormant Commerce Clause need to be triggered?
- Discrimination against an out of staters
2. Burden on interstate commerce.
What are the 2 exceptions to violations of Dormant Commerce Clause?
- Congressional Approval
2. Market Participant
Market Participation Exception: (dormant commerce clause)
ex university
ex. ut cement - with comparison
A state or local government may prefer its own citizens in receiving benefits from government programs or dealing w/ government owned businesses.
ex. CA can give in state tuition for CA residents attending state school
ex. UT cement company charges less for UT citizens compare - unconstitutional if private UT company.
- If the Privileges and Immunities Clause is triggered by discrimination what must it affect for the out of stater? (2)
- What can the state show to avoid violation ?
- Ability to earn a living
- Fundamental right
Important Government Purpose