Consti Midterms Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Separation of Powers?

A

The principle of separation of powers ordains that each of the three great government branches has EXCLUSIVE COGNIZANCE of and is SUPREME in concerns falling within its own constitutionally allocated sphere.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can Legislative powers be delegated?

A

NO. /potestas delegata non delegari potest/ “what has been delegated, cannot be delegated.” This doctrine is based on the ethical principle that such as delegated power constitutes not only a right but a duty to be performed by the delegate through the instrumentality of his own judgment and not through the intervening mind of another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the instances can legislative powers be delegated, if any?

A

PLATE
PEOPLE through initiative and referendum; LOCAL Government Units (LGU); ADMINISTRATIVE Bodies; President on TARIFF powers – Art. VI, Sec. 28(2); President on EMERGENCY powers – Art. VI 23(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is contingent legislation?

A

It is the underlying principle which permits the legislature to provide that the administrative agent may determine the circumstances when the application of a law is required.

The legislature, as it is its duty to do, determines that, under given circumstances, certain executive or administrative action is to be taken, and that, under other circumstances, different or no action at all is to be taken. What is thus left to the administrative official is not the legislative determination of what public policy demands, but simply the ASCERTAINMENT of what the FACTS of the case require to be done according to the terms of the law by which he is governed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the case of ABAKADA vs. Ermita?

A

Petitioners are contesting the constitutionality of RA 9337 which authorizes the President, upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Finance, to raise the VAT rate to 12% when certain conditions are satisfied (GDP growth of 2.8% with regards to VAT collections and 1.5% with regards to National government deficit). They are claiming that it it unconstitutional because it is an undue delegation of legislative power – abandonment by Congress of its exclusive authority to fix the rate of taxes under Article VI, Section 28(2) of the 1987 Constitution.

However, the Court held that there was no undue delegation of powers. What the RA vested to the President (and the Secretary of Finance) is merely the determination of facts on when the law shall be implemented (contingent legislation).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the case of Edu vs. Ericta?

A

Petitioners are contesting the constitutionality of the Administrative Order No. 2 of the LTC, which implements the Reflector Law, as this was an undue delegation of legislative power on the grounds that there is no express standard and it has a provision that is penal in nature.

However, the Court held that there was no undue delegation of powers. It has a standard, albeit implied, which is public safety. Furthermore, the penal provision is not unconstitutional as an already existing statute (RA 4136) has a penal provision to the same effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(1) Can you delegate legislative power to Administrative Bodies? (2) Make rules and regulations? (3) Can the rules and regulations be penal in nature? If so, when?

A

(1) YES; (2) YES; (3) YES (4) When it is published, an existing statute penalizes such act, the penalty is specified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the tests used to determine there was no delegation of powers?

A

COMPLETENESS test and SUFFICIENT STANDARD test. Completeness requires that is must be complete in all its terms and provisions such that all the delegate will have to do when the statute reaches it is to implement it – discretion to determine how the law shall be enforced. Sufficient standard requires that there be boundaries of the delegate’s authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why do you delegate legislative powers?

A

Because we recognize the continuing complexity of our society that the only way for legislative process to move forward is to delegate legislative powers to agencies who are better equipped with the knowledge, subject to limitations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Post-enactment Congressional measure?

A

Means that the Congress still has power/jurisdiction over the law even after it was already given to the Executive branch.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is Post-enactment Congressional measure allowed?

A

YES but only for Scrutiny and Investigation in aid of legislation. Supervision is not allowed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the difference, if any, on initiative and referendum for the Constitution and statute?

A

Initiative and Referendum for the Constitution is proposing AMENDMENTS; for the statute, it is proposing it ENACTMENT (i.e., proposing a new law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Did Marcos exercised legislative powers? Constituent powers? If so, what is the basis?

A

YES as provided in the 6th amendment in the 1935 Constitution. YES as the Court held in the case of Sanidad vs. COMELEC that in line with the president’s legislative power, he can also propose amendments to the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Did Corazon Aquino exercised legislative powers? Throughout her whole term?

A

YES. NO. She only exercised legislative powers until the Freedom Constitution. When the 1987 Constitution came in to full force and effect, the legislative power is vested exclusively to the Congress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who can be Senators?

A

[Article VI, Sec. 3] Any natural-born Filipino citizen, 35 years of age on the day of elections, able to read and write, is a registered voter, and with residency of 2 years here in the Philippines prior to the day of elections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who can be a member of the House?

A

[Article VI, Sec. 6] Any natural-born Filipino citizen, 25 years of age on the day of elections, able to read and write, is a registered voter, and 1 year residence prior to the day of elections

  • for legislative district representatives: in the district he shall be elected
  • for party-list representatives: in the Philippines
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the transitory provision with regards to the synchronization of the elections?

A

[Article XVIII, Sec. 2] The Senators, Members of the House of Representatives, and the local officials first elected under the 1987 Constitution shall serve UNTIL noon of June 30, 1992.
Of the Senators elected in 1992, the 12 members obtaining the highest number of votes shall serve for 6 years and the remaining members for 3 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

If the city has a population of 450,000, can it have 2, 3 or more representatives?

A

YES. The minimum requirement (250,000) gives you 1 representative and anything beyond that, it is within the legislative’s discretion to add more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the legislative districts? Do they all need a population requirement?

A

Cities and provinces. NO, only cities require the 250,000 population requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the case of Sema vs. COMELEC?

A

The Court was asked to rule on whether RA 9054, delegating to the ARMM Regional Assembly the power to create provinces, cities, municipalities and barangays, is constitutional; and if in the affirmative, whether a province created by the ARMM Regional Assembly under MMA Act 201 is entitled to one representative in the House of Representatives without need of a national law creating a legislative district for such province.”

The Court held that RA 9054 is unconstitutional insofar as it grants to the ARMM Regional Assembly the power to create provinces and cities. To create provinces and cities is to create more representatives of the House, which is a power exclusively vested to the Congress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Do you need to be physically present to claim residency? What are the ways to claim residency?

A

NO. Animus manendi & Animus non revertendi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

With regards to all the party-list cases, which case is good law? What is its ruling?

A

BANAT vs. COMELEC. xx

23
Q

Can major political parties join the party-list representatives? If so, on what grounds? If not, why?

A

YES. xx

24
Q

When there is a struggle for leadership with regards to party-lists, who has jurisdiction over it?

A

COMELEC. (what is the basis for this?)

25
Q

When can a party-list nominee be replaced?

A

xx

26
Q

Can you increase your own salary if you’re a member of the legislature? When will the increase take effect?

A

NO. [Article VI, Sec. 10] …No increase in the compensation of Senators or members of the House of Representatives shall take effect until AFTER the expiration of the FULL TERM of ALL MEMBERS of the Senate and the House of Representatives approving such increase.

27
Q

Are Senators and members free from arrest?

A

YES [Art. VI, Sec. 11] as long as the Congress is in session and the offense is not punishable by more than 6 years imprisonment.

28
Q

Was there any freedom from arrest in the 1935 Constitution?

A

YES in civil cases. [Art. VI, Sec. 6] the Members of the National Assembly are privileged from arrest during their attendance at the sessions of the National Assembly in all cases except treason, felony, and breach of the peace. They should also not be questioned for any speech or debate therein.

29
Q

What is the case of Martinez v. Morfe?

A

Petitioners were delegates of the 1972 Constitutional Convention facing criminal prosecution – Martinez for falsification of public documents and Bautista for violating RPC Article 51 for distributing for free foods, drinks, and cigarettes at two public meetings. They particularly invoked constitutional immunity (Art. VI, Sec. 15 of the 1935 Constitution).

However, the Court held that the constitutional provision invoked did not provide any freedom from arrest as the exceptions of treason, felony and breach of peace is too encompassing that there, in fact, really was no freedom from arrest.

30
Q

Are members liable to his/her speech and debate?

A

NO [Art. VI, Sec. 11] They can’t be questioned or held liable in any other place for any speech or debate in the Congress or in any committee thereof.

31
Q

What is an incompatible office?

A

An incompatible office is when a Member of the Congress cannot hold an office in any government agency and government-owned or controlled corporations without forfeiting his seat.

32
Q

What is a forbidden office?

A

A forbidden office is when a Member of the Congress is not allowed to hold an office created during his term or when the emoluments thereof have been increased during his term even if he forfeits his seat.

33
Q

When are the Houses of Congress deemed organized?

A

[Art. VI, Sec. 19] The Senate and the HOR is deemed organized with the election of the President (of the Senate) and the Speaker (of the House).

34
Q

What is shifting majority?

A

The shifting majority is dependent on the number of people present as opposed to absolute majority which concerns all members.

35
Q

How do you compute a quorum?

A

A quorum is an absolute majority of all the members less one [Avelino v. Cuenco: During the supposed date that Sen. Tanada was supposed to have a one-hour speech about the charges against Sen. Pres. Avelino, Avelino walked out along with 6 other senators. After which, the rest of the members (minus 1 who is in the hospital, and 1 in the US) continued with the session. Avelino questioned this since he says this does not constitute a quorum since there are only 12 senators left (which is not majority of 24). However, SC said that the quorum in this is absolute majority less one. Meaning, the 12 votes of the Senators, irregardless of the number of people present still constitutes a quorum.]

36
Q

What is the case of Reyes vs. COMELEC?

A

Petitioner is filing for certiorari for TRO on COMELEC’s Resolution on the grounds that COMELEC didn’t have jurisdiction over her case since she already assumed office – that the HRET has jurisdiction over this instead. However, the Court ruled that COMELEC still has jurisdiction since the HRET’s jurisdiction will start upon the officer’s assumption of office, June 30, which has not yet passed.

DISSENT [Brion]: COMELEC’s jurisdiction ends not upon the assumption of office but on the proclamation of the winning candidate. To use the assumption of office as the reckoning point is violative of the HRET Rules.

37
Q

Is the Senate a continuing body?

A

NO. [Read Hey Arnault!]

38
Q

What is executive privilege?

A

An executive privilege is a presidential prerogative wherein members of the executive, without the permission of the President, are not allowed to appear before either House of Congress.

39
Q

Can the internal rules of Congress change and take effect on the day itself?

A

YES. They can change on the day itself as long as it does not impede on any right.

40
Q

Can internal rules be waived?

A

YES as long as it does does not impede on any right.

41
Q

Can a member of Congress be punished? If so, what are the punishments?

A

YES by Senate. Suspension, censure, expulsion. Suspension and expulsion requires 2/3 vote of all members of that house. xx

42
Q

Can the Court suspend Congress?

A

NO. Except for preventive suspension.

43
Q

What is the difference between proceedings of expulsion and exclusion?

A

For exclusion, you don’t let them assume their seat. For expulsion, they’re thrown out of their office.

44
Q

What is in the journals? Congressional records?

A

FOR JOURNALS: [Article VI, Sec. 16(4)] Publishes proceedings except, through its judgement, articles on national security. It shall show the yays and nays on any question and any information through a 1/5 vote of members present.
FOR CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS: xx

45
Q

How long is a regular session of Congress?

A

[Article VI, Section 15] from 4th Monday of July and will continue until 30 days before the next regular session (June 30) exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays.

47
Q

What is the case of Quizon v. COMELEC?

A

During the May 2007 elections, Quizon filed a petition for disqualification against Puno alleging that he is running as a candidate for a congressional seat in the 1st district of Antipolo since (1) in his COC, he is running in the 1st dist. of Rizal, and (2) he is in fact a resident of QC. COMELEC dismissed this petition. Meanwhile, Puno already won. Quizon filed a MR. The case was already moot since COMELEC had already done its job and Puno had already won (election ended) and there would be no use for a cancellation of COC. Duh.

48
Q

What is the case of Santiago v COMELEC?

A

Petitioner Santiago et al. assails the constitutionality of a petition by Delfin to amend the constitution titled “Petition to Amend the Constitution to Lift Term Limits of elective Officials by People’s Initiative.” Santiago et al. allege that this amendment can only be implemented by a law and since no law was passed and RA 6735 which provides for the 3 systems of initiatives is a pending bill. The court held that the bill has not yet been passed for them to make amendments.

49
Q

What is the case of COCOFED v. Republic?

A

During the Marcos era, the Coconut Investment Fund (CIF) was created wherein taxes were imposed on the sale of copra. The taxes were placed at the disposition of the COCOFED. This was distributed to the coconut farmers as PUB’s capital stock. This then went directly of indirectly to various projects. When Cory came into position, she created the PCGG (you guys know this). The PCGG held that the shares of stock under the coconut farmers were unconstitutional. COCOFED farmers filed a petition saying their properties were sequestered without just compensation. SC ruled that the Fund was TAX IN NATURE. Therefore, it can only be used for public purposes not as shares of stocks to be given to private individuals.
PRIMARY JURISDICTION: Generally, Commission on Audit has jurisdiction over it since it is a public fund. But since the Fund was then used for purchase of private stocks, it deprives the COA of its power to audit and settle accounts. COA does not have audit jurisdiction over the receipt or disbursement of private property.

50
Q

Is the MOA-AD not unconstitutional? Why or why not?

A

The SC held that the MOA-AD is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The MOA-AD gives the ARMM the right to self-governance. It defines the Bangsamoro as “The First Nation” with defined territory and with a system of government, granting authority and jurisdiction over the Bangsamoro land and domain. Basically, they wanted to be an “associative state”. But this is basically them being a transitional state on its way to full independence. The MOA-AD contains numerous provisions that cannot be reconciled with the Consti (they want to revise the Consti to conform to the MOA-AD). It also vests ownership of a vast territory to the Bangsamoro people (basically not to the State’s ownership anymore).

51
Q

What is Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA)?

A

It’s an agreement between the US and Philippines for the improvement of the Mutual Defense Treaty. Features are ff:

  1. No establishment of military base
  2. Sharing of AFP facilities
  3. Phil. Has primary responsibility to the agreed location
  4. Access to the AFP base commander on agreed locations
  5. Phil. Will still own buildings and infrastructure made by US
  6. No nuclear weapons here mothafuckaaazz
  7. Preference for Phil. Products
  8. Regular consultation with the government
52
Q

What is the case of Cariño vs. Insular Government?

A

In 1901, Petitioner, an Igorot in Benguet, filed to allege ownership under the mortgage law, claiming that even though the land in question was registered to him, albeit only possessory in title. For more that 50 years before the Treaty of Paris, his predecessors-in-interest had owned the land and was inherited per Igorot custom.

The Court (decided under US Rule) held that although all lands under the Spanish rule are under the Spanish king, the same cannot be held under the US. Its administration in the Philippines is not to exploit but to do justice for the natives. Furthermore, in case of doubt, the presumption is the possession belongs to the person occupying the land, not the government who wishes to deprive him of it.

53
Q

What are the disciplinary authority of the Ombudsman?

A

[Article XI, Sec. 13] (1) INVESTIGATE any official, from a complaint filed by anyone or on its own; (2) DIRECT any official to perform their duty; (3) DIRECT any official at fault to take appropriate action and recommend removal, demotion (etc.) and ensure compliance; (4) DIRECT officers to furnish copies of transactions of his office that involves use of public funds and report the same to CoA; (5) REQUEST p

54
Q

What is the case of COCOFED v. Republic?

A

During the Marcos era, the Coconut Investment Fund (CIF) was created wherein taxes were imposed on the sale of copra. The taxes were placed at the disposition of the COCOFED. This was distributed to the coconut farmers as PUB’s capital stock. This then went directly of indirectly to various projects. When Cory came into position, she created the PCGG (you guys know this). The PCGG held that the shares of stock under the coconut farmers were unconstitutional. COCOFED farmers filed a petition saying their properties were sequestered without just compensation. SC ruled that the Fund was TAX IN NATURE. Therefore, it can only be used for public purposes not as shares of stocks to be given to private individuals.
PRIMARY JURISDICTION: Generally, Commission on Audit has jurisdiction over it since it is a public fund. But since the Fund was then used for purchase of private stocks, it deprives the COA of its power to audit and settle accounts. COA does not have audit jurisdiction over the receipt or disbursement of private property.

55
Q

Is the MOA-AD not unconstitutional? Why or why not?

A

The SC held that the MOA-AD is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The MOA-AD gives the ARMM the right to self-governance. It defines the Bangsamoro as “The First Nation” with defined territory and with a system of government, granting authority and jurisdiction over the Bangsamoro land and domain. Basically, they wanted to be an “associative state”. But this is basically them being a transitional state on its way to full independence. The MOA-AD contains numerous provisions that cannot be reconciled with the Consti (they want to revise the Consti to conform to the MOA-AD). It also vests ownership of a vast territory to the Bangsamoro people (basically not to the State anymore).