CONSTANT ESOTROPIA WITH AN ACCOMMODATIVE ELEMENT (PARTIALLY ACCOM SOT) Flashcards

concom

1
Q

Characteristics of a constant SOT with an Accom element?

A
  • Onset 1-3 years, gradual
  • Hypermetropia
  • Anisometropia/astigmatism
  • Angle reduces with correction (10∆) but doesn’t correct fully
  • Strabismic/ Aniso Amblyopia
  • Poor BSV potential – likely suppression, possible ARC (small angle)
  • o/a of IO muscles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aetiology of constant sot c accom element

A

Decomp fully accom or convergence excess = non accom element develops
* Small angle costant ET that develops accom element = increase deviation size probably due to lack of bsv

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Investigations in constant sot with accom element?

A
  • Hx
  • Rx + adaptation = give full plus
  • VA
  • CT (light, target, c glss, s glss)
  • OM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Investigation for BSV potential in Constant SOT with an accom element:

A
  • Prism adaptation Test (To assess potential for BSV & appropriate sx target angle)
  • Synoptopher (older children)
  • Post-op diplopia test (children > 5 y/o, those who don’t show evidence of BSV, unlikely if sot left uncorrected)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How to conduct a prism adaptation test?

A
  • To assess potential for BSV & appropriate sx target angle
  • Correction of non-accommodative component with prisms
  • Should be attempted in all patients over 3 yrs
  • All those with 0.3 or better in worse eye
  • Those with <40∆ deviation
  • If angle greater for near than distance

O Correct larger angle
O Divide strength of prism between 2 eyes
O If VA unequal, higher prism before better eye
leave for 1 week?

  • 4 possible responses
  1. Visual axes become straight & BSV confirmed or
  2. Residual microtropia with BSV = Prism responder - ∆ gradually increased to assess maximum angle. When stable <8∆ Sx to correct max angle.
  3. Visual axes reconverge – ‘eating up’ prism – possible ARC or
  4. Remain convergent – lack of binocular cooperation = Nonresponder – BSV cannot be demonstrated
  • Sx on angle measured initially (before PAT). Will have Suppression or Possible diplopia (rare)
    = If ET >8∆ & no BSV after 1/52, increase ∆, see weekly until stable angle <8∆ or ET greater than able to correct with ∆
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Management Aims of constant SOT with an Accom Element?

A
  • Obtain optimum or equal VA
  • Restore normal BSV if possible
    O Early identification of these patients to expedite their treatment for good prognosis
  • Improve cosmetic appearance if no potential for BSV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Management of constant SOT with an Accom Element non surgical

A

Correct any refractive error
* Fully correct – MAXIMUM PLUS
* Refractive adaptation
* Long-term use likely
* If <+3.00DS without cyl & no sign of + increasing, gls could be discarded
O VA and angle reassessed
O Surgery to correct angle without glasses

Treat any amblyopia
* Strabismic amblyopia common
* May also have Anisometropic / Meridional
* Treat amblyopia before attempting to correct deviation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Management of constant SOT with an Accom Element - Treatment to restore BSV?

A
  • Identify patient with potential for BSV from investigation
  • Prism Adaptation Test, BSV test with correcting prism or synoptopher or will have negative sensory / stereo tests
  • These patients have NRC
  • Aim
    o Achieve BSV for near and distance with glasses
    o Consider PAT to identify true angle of deviation
  • Used to restore or promote development of BSV
  • Temporary or incorporated
  • Nonaccommodative component up to 20∆ most suitable
  • Prisms:
    o Used to restore or promote development of BSV
    o Temporary or incorporated
    o Nonaccommodative component up to 20∆ most suitable
  • Botulinium Toxin A
    o MR of deviating eye
    o Causes paralysis of MR for 3/12
    o Temporary reduction or correction of angle
    o Allows investigation of sensory status over vide range of angles
    o Can cause incomitance/vertical deviation/ptosis
    o If gives them BSV, may remain straight
  • Surgery:
    o Type of surgery depends on
     Size of deviation
     Difference between near and distance angle
     Previous surgery
    o Procedure
     Unilateral MR recess / LR resect – deviation N=D
     Bilateral MR recess – deviation N>D
     3-4 procedures if large angle, IO o/a & V-pattern
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Management of constant SOT with an Accom Element - Treatment to improve cosmetic appearance – no BSV potential?

A
  • Good cosmesis = Observation:
    o Small deviation – cosmetically acceptable
    o Treat amblyopia
    o Observe until 7-8 years
    o Patient with ARC – no need for surgery, eyes revert back to original angle
  • Poor cosmesis = Make deviation less noticeable
  • Slightly undercorrect angle – aim for 5-8∆ (residual ET) – PODT
    o Botulinum Toxin A
    o High risk diplopia / unsuitable for surgery
    o Controversial in young due to repeat injections

O Surgery:
O 15-35∆ - 1 muscle surgery = Unilateral MR recess / LR resect – deviation N=D
O 50-70∆ - 2 muscle surgery = Bilateral MR recess – deviation N>D
O >70∆ - 3 muscle surgery = Bilateral MR recession / LR resection, IO o/a & V-pattern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Prognosis of long term surgical outcome of constant SOT with accom element?

A
  • 19% residual ET (Deteriorated refractive ET, Moderate – severe amblyopia, Increasing + with age)
  • 37% surgical success
  • 44% developed consecutive XT (Distance-near disparity, Low + Rx, Anisometropia, Poor BV, Undercorrection of + prior to Sx)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly