CONSTANT ESOTROPIA WITH AN ACCOMMODATIVE ELEMENT (PARTIALLY ACCOM SOT) Flashcards
concom
Characteristics of a constant SOT with an Accom element?
- Onset 1-3 years, gradual
- Hypermetropia
- Anisometropia/astigmatism
- Angle reduces with correction (10∆) but doesn’t correct fully
- Strabismic/ Aniso Amblyopia
- Poor BSV potential – likely suppression, possible ARC (small angle)
- o/a of IO muscles
Aetiology of constant sot c accom element
Decomp fully accom or convergence excess = non accom element develops
* Small angle costant ET that develops accom element = increase deviation size probably due to lack of bsv
Investigations in constant sot with accom element?
- Hx
- Rx + adaptation = give full plus
- VA
- CT (light, target, c glss, s glss)
- OM
Investigation for BSV potential in Constant SOT with an accom element:
- Prism adaptation Test (To assess potential for BSV & appropriate sx target angle)
- Synoptopher (older children)
- Post-op diplopia test (children > 5 y/o, those who don’t show evidence of BSV, unlikely if sot left uncorrected)
How to conduct a prism adaptation test?
- To assess potential for BSV & appropriate sx target angle
- Correction of non-accommodative component with prisms
- Should be attempted in all patients over 3 yrs
- All those with 0.3 or better in worse eye
- Those with <40∆ deviation
- If angle greater for near than distance
O Correct larger angle
O Divide strength of prism between 2 eyes
O If VA unequal, higher prism before better eye
leave for 1 week?
- 4 possible responses
- Visual axes become straight & BSV confirmed or
- Residual microtropia with BSV = Prism responder - ∆ gradually increased to assess maximum angle. When stable <8∆ Sx to correct max angle.
- Visual axes reconverge – ‘eating up’ prism – possible ARC or
- Remain convergent – lack of binocular cooperation = Nonresponder – BSV cannot be demonstrated
- Sx on angle measured initially (before PAT). Will have Suppression or Possible diplopia (rare)
= If ET >8∆ & no BSV after 1/52, increase ∆, see weekly until stable angle <8∆ or ET greater than able to correct with ∆
Management Aims of constant SOT with an Accom Element?
- Obtain optimum or equal VA
- Restore normal BSV if possible
O Early identification of these patients to expedite their treatment for good prognosis - Improve cosmetic appearance if no potential for BSV
Management of constant SOT with an Accom Element non surgical
Correct any refractive error
* Fully correct – MAXIMUM PLUS
* Refractive adaptation
* Long-term use likely
* If <+3.00DS without cyl & no sign of + increasing, gls could be discarded
O VA and angle reassessed
O Surgery to correct angle without glasses
Treat any amblyopia
* Strabismic amblyopia common
* May also have Anisometropic / Meridional
* Treat amblyopia before attempting to correct deviation
Management of constant SOT with an Accom Element - Treatment to restore BSV?
- Identify patient with potential for BSV from investigation
- Prism Adaptation Test, BSV test with correcting prism or synoptopher or will have negative sensory / stereo tests
- These patients have NRC
- Aim
o Achieve BSV for near and distance with glasses
o Consider PAT to identify true angle of deviation - Used to restore or promote development of BSV
- Temporary or incorporated
- Nonaccommodative component up to 20∆ most suitable
- Prisms:
o Used to restore or promote development of BSV
o Temporary or incorporated
o Nonaccommodative component up to 20∆ most suitable - Botulinium Toxin A
o MR of deviating eye
o Causes paralysis of MR for 3/12
o Temporary reduction or correction of angle
o Allows investigation of sensory status over vide range of angles
o Can cause incomitance/vertical deviation/ptosis
o If gives them BSV, may remain straight - Surgery:
o Type of surgery depends on
Size of deviation
Difference between near and distance angle
Previous surgery
o Procedure
Unilateral MR recess / LR resect – deviation N=D
Bilateral MR recess – deviation N>D
3-4 procedures if large angle, IO o/a & V-pattern
Management of constant SOT with an Accom Element - Treatment to improve cosmetic appearance – no BSV potential?
- Good cosmesis = Observation:
o Small deviation – cosmetically acceptable
o Treat amblyopia
o Observe until 7-8 years
o Patient with ARC – no need for surgery, eyes revert back to original angle - Poor cosmesis = Make deviation less noticeable
- Slightly undercorrect angle – aim for 5-8∆ (residual ET) – PODT
o Botulinum Toxin A
o High risk diplopia / unsuitable for surgery
o Controversial in young due to repeat injections
O Surgery:
O 15-35∆ - 1 muscle surgery = Unilateral MR recess / LR resect – deviation N=D
O 50-70∆ - 2 muscle surgery = Bilateral MR recess – deviation N>D
O >70∆ - 3 muscle surgery = Bilateral MR recession / LR resection, IO o/a & V-pattern
Prognosis of long term surgical outcome of constant SOT with accom element?
- 19% residual ET (Deteriorated refractive ET, Moderate – severe amblyopia, Increasing + with age)
- 37% surgical success
- 44% developed consecutive XT (Distance-near disparity, Low + Rx, Anisometropia, Poor BV, Undercorrection of + prior to Sx)