CONSIDERATION- COMMON LAW Flashcards

1
Q

R. 2d § 71. Requirement of Exchange; Types of Exchange

A

i. Consideration requires a performance or return promise to be
bargained for.
1. Performance may include:
a. An act other than a promise; or
b. A forbearance; or
c. The creation, modification or destruction of a
legal relation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

NOT CONSIDERATION:

A

i. Promises based only on past actions
ii. Promises based only on moral obligation
iii. Promises that aren’t, really, such as:
1. Nominal promises
2. Settlement of claims that were invalid and with no reasonable basis for believing they might be meritorious
3. Illusory Promises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Forbearance as Consideration.

A

If the promisee refrains from doing something that he has a legal right to do, or forgoing some activity in which he had a legal right to engage, the court will deem this sufficient consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

HAMER V SIDWAY- CASE LAW

A

RULE: In general, a waiver of any legal right at the request of another party (forbearance) is sufficient consideration for a promise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Adequacy and Sufficiency of Consideration.

A

i. Courts will not inquire into the adequacy of consideration.
ii. Courts do not police the equivalence of bargained-for
exchanges via the consideration doctrine.
1. The supposed inadequacy of consideration is no defense
to a breach of contract claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

LUCHTS CONCRETE V HORNER CASE LAW

A

RULE: Forbearance from exercising a legal right constitutes adequate consideration for a non-competition agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

SCHNELL V NELL CASE LAW

A

RULE: Merely nominal consideration is unconscionable; moral
consideration is not adequate consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Past and Moral Consideration.

A

A promise given in exchange for something already given or already performed will not satisfy the consideration requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MILLS V WYMAN CASE LAW

A

RULE: Moral obligation alone is insufficient consideration to make a promise enforceable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R. 2d § 82. Promise to Pay Indebtedness; Effect of the Statute of Limitations

A

i. A promise to pay all/part of a prior contractual indebtedness owed by the promisor is binding if the indebtedness is still enforceable or would be except for a statute of limitations. (consideration not necessary)
1. Such promises include:
a. Voluntary acknowledgement to the person owed,
admitting the presence of the indebtedness; or
b. Partial payment/collateral security; or
c. A statement to the obligee that the statute of
limitations will not be pleaded as a defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Settlement of an Invalid Claim is Enforceable if:

A

i. The settling plaintiff had a genuine belief that the claim was
valid at the time of the settlement, and
ii. The claim was, at worst, doubtful (as opposed to obviously
invalid) from the perspective of a reasonable person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

FIEGE V BOEHM CASE LAW

A

RULE: The forbearance from asserting a good faith legal claim constitutes valid consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The Pre-Existing Duty Rule.

A

i. A promise to do what one already is legally obligated to do is
not good consideration.
1. Issue frequently arises when:
a. Two parties have made one contract, and then make a second contract.
b. The question then becomes whether there is consideration for the second contract to make it enforceable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ALASKA PACKERS V DOMENICO CASE LAW

A

RULE: There can be no consideration for a modified contract
that arises from a coerced promise for increased compensation for performing what one is already obligated to perform.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly