Consideration Flashcards

1
Q

What is consideration

A

Both parties to a contract must offer something by way of exchange for a contract to be formed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

There must be a _____ not a ___

A
  • bargain
  • gift
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is issue 1?

A
  • consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

____ arent concerned whether there has been a ___ ___ ____ _____, just that there has been ___ and its ___ __ _____ (case?)

A

courts
good or bad bargain
one
not a gift
Thomas v Thomas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consideration must be __ and have ___ ___ (White v ___)

A

real
some value
White v Bluett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

main facts of White v Bluett

A

father promised to write off son’s debt if he stopped complaining - argument failed because there was no consideration as he had no legal right to complain, the promise was too intangible

(complaining isnt a legal right, he didnt actually give up anything)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

main facts Chappell v Nestle

A

the choco wrappers amounted to consideration even though they were of very little value because the company had requested them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

However, what is ___ and of value is not always ___ ____ (case?)

A

real
easily distinguishable
Ward v Byham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Main facts Ward v Byham

A

father of a child promised mother money towards its upkeep if she kept the child well looked after - going above legal obligation as a mother = good value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

___ ___ ___ may also be sufficient consideration, if they have a ___ ___ to it. (_____ v Bischoffsheim)

A

Giving something up
legal right
Callisher v Bischoffsheim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Callisher v Bischoffsheim main facts

A

Classed as consideration as C gave away legal right to sue, D gained by not being sued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is issue 2?

A

Past consideration is no consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Key case for past consideration is no consideration

A

Re McArdle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

past consideration is no consideration (____), Therefore, ___ ____ is only ___ after work has been done , then this is __ ___ _____ and the payment cannot be _____

A

Re McArdle
if payment
promised
not good consideration
enforced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Past consideration EXCEPTION is often in the case of…? (case?)

A

commercial agreements
Re Casey’s Patent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Re Casey’s patent main facts

A

C worked on patents for a company. it was implied that when he worked on them he would receive some payment given the commercial nature of the agreement

17
Q

(EXCEPTION) This is also the case if the ___ ___ were ____ by the party who later ____ ____ (____ v ___wait)

A

actions taken
requested
promises payment
Lampeigh v Braithwait

18
Q

Lampeigh v Braithwait main facts

A

C had only done the action to obtain royal pardon because he was specifically requested to, therefore D should have withheld the implied promise

19
Q

However,the exception is if there’s an ____ ____ that there will be a _____

A

implied promise
payment

20
Q

However, these exceptions will only mean there is a good consideration if… (case?)

A

it would’ve been enforceable had the promise been made in advance, therefore all the rules of consideration apply (Pan v Lau)

(basically, promise must still meet all basic requirements for the exceptions to make it a good consideration)

21
Q

what is issue 3?

A

performing a pre-existing duty is not consideration for a new contract

22
Q

Performing a _______ ___ is not consideration for a new contract. Therefore, where a party is already ___, or _____ obliged to do something , this ___ ___ amount to ____ consideration for a new contract (case? x2)

A

pre-existing duty
legally
contractually
can never
sufficient
Stilk v Myrick, Collins v Godefroy

23
Q

Main facts of Stilk v Myrick
What type of duty is this?

A

where the claim for additional wages (£5) failed when captain asked remaining crew to do extra work after 2 had deserted because it was part of their duty

Contractual duty

24
Q

Main facts of Collins v Godefroy
What type of duty is this?

A

Policeman was under a court order to attend and give evidence at trial, D promised to pay him money if he did. –> not enforceable
Public Duty

25
Q

Consideration can be found however, where a ___ has given more than ___ ___ expected __ ___ ___ (case), or _____ a ____ duty (case)

A

party
to be
of their duty
(Hartley v Ponsonby)
exceeded
public (Glasbrook Bors v Glamorgan)

26
Q

What did Williams v Roffey show?

A

where a party has gained a financial/practical benefit, then this may be consideration

27
Q

Williams v Roffey main facts

A

Roffey avoided penalties from tenant, Williams got additional payments directly from Roffey Bros

28
Q

Hartley v Ponsonby main facts

A

After desertion, only 19 members of 36 remained and had to do more work than obliged

29
Q

Glasbrook Bors v Glamorgan main facts

A

The police had provided more men and lived on the site as D wanted, providing protection in a different way than they usually would’ve, there was a sufficient consideration