Consideration Flashcards
Governed by
Common law
Consideration requires each party to the agreement to give something to the other party by way of exchange
Currie v Misra
Without consideration there would be no legally binding agreement
Thomas v Thomas
Adequate consideration: adequate consideration exists when the things to be exchanged by the parties is acceptable to all of them
Thomas v Thomas
Adequate consideration: it doesn’t matter that the things to be exchanged are of unequal value
Chappell v Nestle
Sufficient consideration: sufficient consideration will exist if the thing to be exchanged are real and have some value
White v Bluett
Sufficient consideration: the value can be nominal, as long as the thing has some value
Chappell v Nestle
Sufficient consideration: promising to stop complaining was insufficient consideration
White v Bluett
Sufficient consideration: promising to make a child happy was sufficient consideration
Ward v Byham
Consideration must move from the promisee: consideration must move from the promisee to the promisor
Tweddle v Atkinson
Performing a pre-existing duty: performing an existing obligation does not create new consideration for a new agreement, as the party is doing what they are expected to do
Stilk v Myrick
Performing a pre-existing duty: However, if an additional element is provided, this can create new consideration and a new agreement for this
Ponsonby v Hartley
Performing a public duty: a duty arising due to a public duty will not create new consideration for a new agreement as the party is doing what is required for their public duty
Collins v Godefroy
Performing a public duty: however, if they go beyond what is expected of this public duty, new consideration is provided that leads to a new agreement
Glasbrook bros v Glamorgan County Council
Obligation to a third party: a promise to do something as a part of a contract, which a party is already obligated to do, can be good consideration for a different party, if they make a promise to them to do it
Shadwell v Shadwell