conservation bio ONE Flashcards
Science of Conservation
conservation is a scientific endeavor to understand the natural world to minimize extinctions. The scientific method is used to formulate and test hypotheses to answer research questions
hypothesis– answer to a research question that makes testable predictions
- research question
- hypothesis
- prediction
- new data
- compare data
- reject or support hypothesis
individuals
populations
species
communities
individual: male, female, juvenile, etc
population: made up of individuals
species: can have many populations and subspecies
communities: have many different species
why is it hard to define “species”
because speciation is a continuous process
allopatric speciation
isolation leads to unique populations via mutations and differential selection which can lead to new species with a unique evolutionary history
biological species concept (BSC)
species: groups of interbreeding populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups
subspecies: distinct populations of species, which are unique but still have gene flow
subspecies are incipient species
time and isolation for differences can develop, but are still not reproductively isolated
biodiversity
diversity of and within species over some defined area– species and their genetic variation
species richness
total number of species in an area (common metric for biodiversity)
why do we want to prevent extinction and preserve biodiversity, what is their value
philosophical and ecological
2 philosophical values to save species
- Inherent (intrinsic) value: they are valued just because they exist, most often seen in charismatic species
- Utilitarian value: they provide direct and indirect benefits to humans
- direct benefits: food, fuel, material, medicine (vincristine and aplidin)
- indirect benefits (ecosystem services): crop pollination, water purification, erosion regulation, pest regulation, soil formation, climate regulation
- overall $33 billion/year estimated benefit
Ecological reason to save species
High diversity ecosystems function better (are more productive and resilient) than depauperate (low diversity) ecosystems
ecosystem function increases with community diversity
Tilman Prairie Biodiversity Experiment
- low and high diversity plots established and compared
- high diversity plots had: higher biomass (more productive), retained soil nutrients, more resilient to drought and disease, less herbivory by grasshoppers, fewer weedy invadors
diverse systems being more productive and “healthier” has implications for agriculture, range land, and forestry
why is there a biodiversity crisis
- people do not understand/appreciate the value of species and biodiversity
- economic externalities exist, leading to environmental degradation
(externality: hidden cost in economic transaction; hidden cost: environmental degradation; environment pays for this hidden cost)
environment is damaged unless the government gets involved
examples of externalities
- byproducts of industrial production– toxins
- released into air, water, ground
- toxins degrade the environment (reduce survival and reproduction of organisms)
5 mass extinctions that dramatically reduced global diversity.
Which was the most intense?
- 443– Ordovician (26, 60, 86)
- 359– Devonian (22, 57, 75)
- 251– Permian * (51, 82, 96)
- 200– Triassic (22, 53, 80)
- 65– Cretaceous (16, 47, 76)
Permian was most intense, with a 51% family, 82% genera, and 96% species extinction
Overall, D— Pleases The C—
what was the cause of these extinctions
what about in the cretaceous
Temporal
extra-terrestrial: massive volcanic eruption with associated changes in oceanic and atmospheric chemistry and climate change. toxic gas in the air changes global chemistry, hurting survival and reproduction. Asteroid, earthquakes, tidal waves
how many species are formally described
how many new ones are described per year
1.5 million
~ 15,000
undescribed species and total species estimate
10 million, 5-15 million
(most are insects
biodiversity hotspots
unusually high levels of biodiversity
(tropical forests, tropical lakes, coral reefs, temprate shrublands with mediterrean climate– wet winter, dry spring summer fall)
how much of the area is made up of biodiversity hotspots and how many species do they have
5-10 percent contain over 25 percent of all species
latitudinal diversity gradient
highest diversity near the equator and declines as you move towards the poles, has been this way for millions of years
on a graph, 0 is the equator
hypotheses for the LDG
- based on evolutionary NOT ecological time
1. stability
2. productivity (energy)
3. area
2 mechanisms that cause change in diversity over evolutionary time
and the LDG hypotheses must explain these
- speciation increases diversity
- extinction decreases diversity
ecological time is
within the lifespan of a species
evolutionary time is
over many thousands of generations (millions of years)
stability hypothesis
- the tropic regions have been the most climatically stabilized for many years
- increased stability promotes lower extinction rates
- evidence: climate has fluctuated globally, how is it at the equator? hard to know
productivity (energy) hypothesis
- productivity = rate of conversion of solar energy to biological energy (photosynthesis). measures by change in plant biomass
- since the earth is tilted, the tropics have the most solar radiation
- more resources = higher pop sizes and lower extinction rates
how was the productivity hypothesis tested ?
- productivity increased by feeding nutrients
- but increase led to decreased diversity, oops
- but, this was done in ecological time, so maybe its not a fair test
Area Hypothesis
- based on data
- more species are found in larger areas
- slope shows how quickly you pick up species
how to do the area hypothesis
- divide the globe into biomes (tropical, temperate, artic/boreal) for all latitudes
results of area hypothesis
- tropic biome has largest area and most species, temperate, then boreal
- tropical north and south biomes are contiguous, hence why its area is greater than all others
what does area hypothesis have to do with speciation and extinction
more area -> species move -> vicariance (something breaking area) -> split -> allopatric speciation -> greater speciation rate
greater area = more resources = higher population sizes = lower extinction risk
support for area hypothesis
vicariance in tropics has increased due to cooling. and speciation is higher on larger islands
what type of animals were extinct during the pleistocene extinctions
large-bodied mammals and big birds; bigger than 100 lbs
where and when was the pleistocene extinction
North and South America, about 12,000 years ago
how many mammals went extinct in NA pleistocene
34/37
- 50% of 70 pound ones gona
- and all 2100 ones extinct
- bison was only big survivor (2000)
how many mammals went extinct in SA pleistocene
80% big bois
what were the large species during Pleis called
megafauna
what about Pleis in Eurasia and Africa
not many– some in Eurasia and very few in africa
what to understand to answer these extinction patterns ?
- why clustered towards the end
- why in just NA and SA
- why just big bois and birds
2 proposed Pleis extinct hypotheses
- climate change
- human overkill
climate change hypothesis
- ice ages, prolonged cooling and warming periods
- glacial maximum and global warming at the end
- changes in climate at the end of the Pleis led to habitat changes that negatively affected species
- big bodies need more resources and have lower repro rates
- endotherms (birds and mammals) are most vulnerable to climate change, as they need very specific foods and climates
- many guys lived in grass and savannah, which were reduced as the earth warmed. thus species-area relationship