Consequences of breach of EU law by a member state Flashcards

1
Q

In what aspects may the consequences of breach of EU law be discussed?

A

From the perspective of the EU and from the perspective of an individual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What kind of procedure is provided in article 7 of the Treaty on the European Union?

A

A three-stage procedure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

On what value is the Union founded?

A

On the values of respect of human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights including the right of persons belonging to minorities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Against which member state is the three-stage procedure pending at the present moment?

A

Poland.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is the Commission called the guardian of treaties?

A

Because according to Article 17 of Treaty on the EU, the Commission shall promote the general interests of the Union and take appropriate initiatives to that end. It shall ensure the application of the treaties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is one of the most obvious violations of EU law?

A

Lack of the transposition of a directive; adoption of a legal act which is incompatible with EU law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why was France held liable in the judgement Commission vs. France?

A

France was held liable for failing to take all necessary and proportionate measures in order to prevent the free movement of fruit and vegetables from being obstructed by actions of private individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is allowed under Article 36 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU?

A

It is allowed for a member state to apply prohibitions or restrictions on imports-exports of goods in transit, justified on the grounds of public morality, public policy or public security as well as the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants and the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value or the protection of industrial and commercial property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In the light of the practice and the jurisprudence of the Court, in how many stages the proceeding against a member state may be divided into?

A

It may be divided into two stages; administrative; pre-litigation and judicial procedure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who can initiate the administrative procedure?

A

The European Commission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How many phases has the administrative proceeding?

A

Two phases: informal and formal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is there an express provision in the Treaty on the liability of a member state for damage caused to an individual as a result of a breach of EU law?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was held in the case Francovich vs. Bonifaci regarding the damage caused to an individual as a result of a breach of EU law?

A

The Court reminded that the subjects of the legal system, which is integrated into the legal systems of the member states, are not only the member states but also their nationals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is the principle of liability inherent in the system of the treaties?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In what judgement did the Court held the decisive test for finding that the breach of EU law is sufficiently serious?

A

In the Brasserie and Factortame judgement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the principle of procedural autonomy?

A

In the absence of EU legislation, it is for the internal legal order of each Member State to indicate the competent courts and lay down the detailed procedural rules for legal proceedings intended to fully safeguard the rights which individuals derived from EU law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the principle of equality?

A

In the light of the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the EU, the conditions for reparation of loss and damage let down by the national law of the member states must not be less favorable than those relating to similar domestic claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the principle of effectiveness of procedural measures?

A

The principle of equality must not be so framed as to make it virtually impossible or excessively difficult to obtain reparation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What do the principle of equality and principle of effectiveness of procedural measures limit?

A

The procedural autonomy of a member state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Is the infringement procedure a prerequisite for the claim of damages?

A

No. It would be contrary to the principle of the effectiveness of EU law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is article 7. of the Treaty on the EU?

A

22
Q

What is article 258. of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU?

A

23
Q

Explain the three-stage procedure under article 7 of the Treaty on the EU.

A

24
Q

What is article 17. of the Treaty on the EU?

A

25
Q

How does a member state act through?

A

Through its authorities.

26
Q

What did the Court held in the Foster case regarding the responsibility of a member state?

A

A member state may be responsible also for a body whatever its legal form has been made responsible according to a measure adopted by the state for providing public service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special powers beyond those which result from the normal rules applicable in relations between individuals.

27
Q

What did the Court held in the judgement Commission vs. France?

A

It held that a member state may be responsible also for failing to take all necessary and proportionate measures in order to prevent the violation of EU law by private parties.

28
Q

What is article 36. of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?

A

29
Q

What shall the Commission deliver if it considers that a member state has failed to fulfill an obligation under the treaties?

A

It shall deliver a reasoned opinion on the matter after giving the state concerned an opportunity to submit its observations.

30
Q

Explain the two phases of administrative proceedings in the case of lack of transposition of a directive.

A

31
Q

What does the Commission do in the informal phase of administrative proceedings?

A

It tries to get more information about the alleged violation and asks the state in question for an explanation. Afterward, it issues a letter of formal notice.

32
Q

What is a letter of formal notice of the Commission?

A

It is an act in which the Commission for the first time formulates allegations against a member state.

33
Q

Is the member state obliged to answer the letter of formal notice?

A

No.

34
Q

What does the reasoned opinion of the Commission set limits to?

A

It sets limits on the court’s jurisdiction of the case.

35
Q

What is the second stage of the proceedings?

A

The litigation proceedings.

36
Q

What does it mean that a judgement is of declaratory character?

A

It is binding for the member state and the court decides whether the member state has violated EU law.

37
Q

May the procedure for violation of EU law be initiated by another member state as well?

A

Yes.

38
Q

What is article 259. of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?

A

39
Q

In what time the Commission has to deliver a reasoned opinion?

A

Within three months of the date on which the matter was brought before it.

40
Q

What did the Court held in the case Commission vs. France regarding the penalties?

A

It held that the recourse to both types of penalties is not precluded. While the imposition of a penalty payment seems particularly suited to inducing a member state to put an end as soon as possible to a breach of obligations which in the absence of such a measure would tend to persist. The imposition of a lump sum is based more on assessment of the effects on public and private interests of the failure of the member state concerned to comply with its obligations.

41
Q

What did the Court order France to do regarding penalties in the case Commission vs. France?

A

It ordered the French Republic to pay both penalty and the lump sum.

42
Q

How is the penalty payment calculated as?

A

It is calculated as a multiplication of the flat rate amount at present 700 euro, the aggrievedness of the breach in a scale from 1 to 20 and the time factor from 1 to 3, as well as the economic factor calculated for each state separately.

43
Q

How is the lump sum calculated as?

A

It is calculated as a multiplication of the flat rate amount at present two hundred and thirty euro. The aggrievedness of the breach, the time factor as a number of days of breach of EU law and the economic factor are calculated for each member state separately.

44
Q

Which principle does the principle of effectiveness underlie?

A

It underlies the principle of liability of a member state for damage.

45
Q

What is the principle of sincere cooperation in the light of article 4. of the Treaty on the EU?

A

The member states are required to take all appropriate measure whether general or particular to ensure fulfillment of their obligations under EU law and they are obligated as well to nullify the unlawful consequences of a breach of EU law.

46
Q

What did the Court found, regarding the principle of liability, in the judgement Brasserie and FactorTime?

A

It found that the principle of liability is reflected by the provision of the treaty according to which in the case of non-contractual liability of the EU, the EU shall in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the member states make good any damage caused by its institutions or by its servants in the performance of duties.

47
Q

What are the conditions under which the state may be held liable for damage caused to individuals according to the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice?

A

The rule of law infringed must be intended to confer rights on individuals. The breach must be sufficiently serious and there must be a direct causal link between the breach of the obligation resting on the state and the damage sustained by the injured parties.

48
Q

What are the factors the court takes into consideration for finding that a breach of law is sufficiently serious (decisive test)?

A
  • the clarity and the precision of the rule breached
  • the measure of discretion left by that rule to the national or EU authorities
  • whether the infringement and the damage caused was intentional or involuntary
  • whether any error of law was excusable or inexcusable
49
Q

When is a breach of EU law clearly sufficient serious according to the Court of Justice?

A

It is sufficient serious if it has persisted despite a judgement finding the infringement in question to be established or a preliminary ruling.

50
Q

What kind of legal effect have the right of individuals arising from the provisions of EU law in domestic legal systems?

A

Direct effect.