Consent Flashcards

1
Q

Consent In-Fact Prima Facie Elements

A

When circumstances present themselves, consent in-fact must be directly communicated by manifestation of:

  1. Words, silence or inaction, or even w/o manifestation
  2. Even w/o manifs., by any competent evidence to exist in fact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Implied Consent Prima Facie Elements

A

Words or conduct are reasonably understood by other as intent to consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Emergency Action w/o Consent Prima Facie Elements

A

Not liable for injury from non-consensual extension if:

(a) Emergency causes reasonable necessity to act to prevent harm to patient before there’s opportunity to obtain consent from anyone, AND
(b) There’s no reason to believe patient would’ve declined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Implied Consent Within Bounds of Game

A

In organized games (backyard, amateur or pro), there is implied consent to all activity “within the understood bounds of the game.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consent Procured by Fraud or Duress Prima Facie Elements

A

Consent is invalid if;

(a) Consent induced by substantial mistake regarding nature OR
(b) Expected extent of harm of invasion AND
(c) It is known by the acting person, OR
(d) Is induced by other’s misrepresentation, OR
(e) Is given under duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Consent to Lifesaving Medical Treatment Prima Facie Elements

A
  1. If doctor knows or has reason to know from past experiences w/patient that consent wouldn’t be given he’s not privileged to act.
  2. Courts do have their own discretion to circumvent patients wishes by authorizing lifesaving medical treatment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Barton (’33): Consent directly by words even though the act was actually a criminal offense

A

Judge is uncomfortable with allowing young women to sue due to statutory rape b/c; “they may use their seductive properties dishonestly.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

O’Brien (1891): When bodily manifestations, combined with current situation is implied consent

A

Due to O’Brien’s voluntary bodily actions (lining up with everyone for vaccinations and stuck her arm out to doc), her manifestations implied consent for vaccine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bang (1958): Extension of original operation was not an emergency

A

Doctor extended the original operation without Bang’s consent when it was not an emergency and cut his seminal cords, so he was held liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Kennedy (’56): Emergency forces extension w/o ability to gain consent

A

Court states that it is permissible to do so if (a)it is a necessary, (b)immediate, (c)emergency and is (d)sound medical move and (e)doctor has no reason to think patient would object.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Implied Consent Within Bounds of Game: Hackbart (’79)

A

When player is injured b/c of action which is outside bounds of game, that player can recover damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Consent Procured by Fraud or Duress Prima Facie Elements

A

Consent is invalid if;

(a) Consent induced by substantial mistake regarding nature OR
(b) Expected extent of harm of invasion AND
(c) It is known by the acting person, OR
(d) Is induced by other’s misrepresentation, OR
(e) Is given under duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Consent to Lifesaving Medical Treatment Prima Facie Elements

A
  1. If doctor knows or has reason to know from past experiences w/patient that consent wouldn’t be given he’s not privileged to act.
  2. Courts do have their own discretion to circumvent patients wishes by authorizing lifesaving medical treatment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

State Farm (’93): Pulling Intent, Consent and Liability all Together

A

Even though he knew (foreseeable) there was appreciable risk of spreading herpes and may have acted reckless, he didn’t act WITH SUBSTANTIAL CERTAINTY so is not liable for injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly