consent Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

whats the general principle of the law on consent

A
  • law prohibits only unlawful force, consent generally negates guilt unless injury is gbh or above
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Q: In what circumstances is consent not valid for ABH or above?

A

Unless one of the exceptions applies, such as surgery, sports, or tattooing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q: What case illustrates that consent does not negate liability if actual bodily harm is intended or caused?

A

A: AG’s Ref (No. 6 of 1980).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Q: How does everyday life limit the defence of consent?

A

A: General exceptions for minor physical contact in everyday life, such as Collins v Wilcock and Wilson v Pringle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Q: What are the key elements of consent in law?

A

A: Consent must be real, informed, and not obtained through fear, deception, or misunderstanding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q: What case involved consent obtained through deception about medical qualifications?

A

A: Tabassum – Consent was invalid as the women were deceived about the nature of the act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Q: What case ruled that consent obtained through fear is not effective?

A

Olugboja

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the significance of Richardson in relation to consent?

A

A: It ruled that consent was valid unless the victim was deceived about the nature or quality of the act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Q: What case ruled that consent was invalid if the victim was unaware of the defendant’s HIV infection?

A

A: Dica.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Q: What case ruled that consent is ineffective if the victim did not know about the accused’s biological condition (HIV)?

A

Konzani

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q: Can consent be implied in some situations?

A

A: Yes, as seen in Wilson v Pringle, implied consent can occur in the context of everyday physical contact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q: When can consent not be validly given?

A

A: When the person lacks the capacity to consent, such as in Burrell v Harmer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q: How does the law view consent in relation to children or mentally ill individuals?

A

A: Consent may not be valid if given by a child or someone mentally ill (R v Howard).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q: Can consent be a defence in sports or physical contact?

A

A: Yes, if it is within the rules of the game, as seen in Billingshurst and Barnes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Q: How does public interest affect consent in sexual activity?

A

A: Consent in sado-masochism may be inoperative if it is contrary to public interest, as seen in Brown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Q: What case allowed a defence of consent in the context of horseplay, despite serious injuries?

A

jones

16
Q

Q: What is the position on consent and murder or euthanasia?

A

A: There is no defence of consent in relation to murder or euthanasia (Pretty, Nicklinson).