Consensus (5) Flashcards

1
Q

An offer + Acceptance =

A

Consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

An offer is defined as?

A

a declaration of intent made by a prospective contracting party (the offeror), that contains the proposals regarding the proposed contract, and that is of such a nature that mere acceptance thereof by the person to whom the offer was addressed (offeree), legally brings a contract into being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The requirements for a valid offer are that it?

A

Must be made with the intention to serve as an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The requirements for a valid offer are that it?

A

Must be made with the intention to serve as an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the elements for a legal contract?

A
  • Must be made with the intention to serve as an offer
  • Must be firm
  • Must be complete
  • Must be noticed to the offeree
  • Must be clear, certain and unambiguous
  • Must be made to a specific person or group of persons
  • Formalities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The requirements for a valid offer are that it?

A
  • Must be made with the intention to serve as an offer
  • Must be firm
  • Must be complete ( For example, one cannot make an offer to rent property, without specifying the premises,)
  • Must be noticed to the offeree (An offer is only complete if it has come to the notice of the offeree.)
  • Must be clear, certain and unambiguous (An offer must be clear, certain and unambiguous.)
  • Must be made to a specific person or group of persons (An offer must be made to either a specific person or to a group of persons.)
  • Formalities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Does an offer constitute a valid contract?

A

No. An offer merely constitutes a unilateral juristic act, whereas the conclusion of a contract constitutes a bilateral juristic act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

An offer is terminated?

A

if it is revoked by the offeror before being accepted by the offeree;
- if it is rejected by the offeree;
- if the offeree makes a counter-offer;
- if one of the parties become legally incapacitated (for example, if the offeror is diagnosed with a mental illness);
- by the effluxion of time – i.e. if an offer was only open for a period of time, and the offeree failed to accept the offer within the prescribed time period; or
- by death of either the offeror or the offeree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

All of the following are instances when an offer is
terminated, except?

A

If there is a death of the offeror only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the name of the party to whom an offer is made?

A

Offeree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the name of the party who makes an offer to enter into a contract?

A

Offeror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sarah makes an offer to purchase Sipho’s house. What does this offer constitute?

A

A unilateral juristic act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

All of the following are legal requirements of a valid offer except?

A

It must be ambiguous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The requirements for a valid acceptance are summarised in the following figure

A
  • Serious intent
  • The offeree must be aware
  • Clear, certain and unambiguous
  • Correspond
  • Generally, no formalities
  • Notice of Offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the three expedition theory regarding a contract?

A
  • Information theory
  • Reception theory
  • Expedition theory
  • Information theory: (which is based on ‘actual and conscious agreement between the parties’ This theory states that the contract enters into force when and where the acceptance by the offeree comes to the notice of the offeror. For example, if the contract is concluded telephonically, the contract will enter into force when and where the offeror hears the acceptance of the offer by the offeree. Equally, a contract that was concluded by means of a fax, will enter into force when and where the offeror reads the notice of acceptance by the offeree.
  • Expedition theory (postal contracts = when both the offer and the acceptance are made by means of post While real postal contracts have largely fallen into disuse in today’s commercial world, it is still necessary to be aware of and understand this acceptance theory. The expedition theory states that the contract will enter into force on the date and at the place where the offeree posts the letter of acceptance. There are two exceptions to the application of the expedition theory: if the address is clearly wrong on the envelope; and if there is a disruption in the postal services (e.g. as a result of a strike).
    In both of these exceptional circumstances, the information theory will apply to the real postal contract instead.)
  • Reception theory (‘the facilitation and regulation of electronic communications and transactions’. This means that the contract will enter into force when and where the data message in which the offeree accepts the offer is received by the offeror. Section 23(b) further states that a data message is taken as having been received by the ‘addressee’ (the offeror) when it enters a system designated for receiving such messages, and is capable of being retrieved by the addressee. This does not mean that the offeror must have read the answer, but merely that the offeror must have received the acceptance.
  • A data message is defined in section 1 of the ECTA as: data generated, sent, received or stored by electronic means and includes voice, where the voice is used in an automated transaction; and
    a stored record.
    As such, the reception theory is used when contracts are concluded by means of email, WhatsApp, SMS and the like.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain Information theory?

A
  • Telephonic contracts; or contracts concluded by means of fax
  • When and where the acceptance comes to the notice of the offeror.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain Expedition theory?

A
  • Real postal contracts
  • When and where the offeree posts the letter of acceptance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain Reception theory?

A
  • Contracts concluded by means of data message
  • When the offeror receives the acceptance of the offer; the ‘where’ is assumed to be at their normal place of residence or workplace.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What information is useful to include on a contract?

A

When and where the contract was concluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Elizabeth offers Tom R1400 for his laptop. Tom thanks Elizabeth for the offer, but says that he will accept no less than R1600 for the laptop. What is this an example of?

A

Counter offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Which theory states that the contract comes into force when and where the acceptance comes to the notice of the offeror?

A

Information theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is required for an acceptance to be valid?

A

The acceptance must correspond with the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Under which theory does the contract come into force when the offeree posts the letter of acceptance?

A

Expedition theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

So-called ‘ticket contracts’ refer to contracts that are concluded when one party issues a ticket to the other party that contains?

A

‘terms and conditions’ of the contract. Perhaps you have seen such terms on. Perhaps you have seen such terms on the back of a plane ticket or a bus ticket?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

In terms of the South African common law, a person is bound to the terms of a ticket contract if the following questions can be answered in the positive?

A
  • Does the ticket holder know that there are words on the back of the ticket?
  • Does the ticket holder know if the terms on the back of the ticket referred to terms of a contract?
  • Did the issuer of the ticket take all reasonable precautions to draw the ticket holder’s attention to the fact that the words on the back of the ticket referred to terms in a contract?
    If the answer is ‘yes’ to all three of the above questions, then the ticket holder is bound to the terms, as set out in the reverse side of the ticket.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Give any two examples of ticket contracts.

A
  • Terms on the back of a plane, bus or concert ticket
  • Exemption clauses, such as, ‘Park at your own risk when entering the parking garage.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Identify the three questions that one has to answer in the affirmative, to determine whether or not the terms of a ticket contract were included in the agreement between the issuer of the ticket and the ticket holder?

A
  • Does the ticket holder know that there are words on the back of the ticket?
  • Does the ticket holder know that the terms on the back of the ticket, referred to terms of a contract?
  • Did the issuer of the ticket take all reasonable precautions to draw the ticket holder’s attention to the fact that the words on the back of the ticket referred to terms in a contract?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Angelina is a client of Fire and Ice (Pty) Ltd. Fire and Ice (Pty) Ltd is a tenant in Green Office Park. Green Office Park is erecting a new building in the office park. One morning, Angelina enters Green Office Park. As she is walking to Fire and Ice (Pty) Ltd’s offices in the designated walk lane, a brick falls on her head. Angelina sustains severe bodily injuries. After an investigation, it is found that one of Green Office Park’s employees was negligent, and caused the brick to fall on Angelina’s head.

Angelina sues Green Office Park for the damages that she incurred. Green Office Park contends that it cannot be held liable, as Angelina, having acknowledged that she saw, read and understood the exemption notice, agreed to enter Green Office Park, on the basis that Green Office Park will not be liable for any bodily harm that she may sustain.

Required:

Explain, with reference to case law, whether or not Green Office Park is likely to succeed with its argument.

A

The facts are similar to those of Naidoo v Birchwood Hotel 2012 (6) SA 170 (GSJ), in which it was held that an exemption clause that excludes liability for bodily harm in hotels and other public places, has the effect, generally, of denying a claimant judicial redress. As such, the exemption clause would not be enforceable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What does an ‘exemption notice’ do?

A

It exempts one of the parties to the contract from liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What does an ‘exemption notice’ do?

A

It exempts one of the parties to the contract from liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is ‘Park at your own risk’ signage an example of?

A

Exemption notice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

In which example below would you be bound to a ticket contract?

A

Purchasing a plane ticket from your local travel agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What would you ask a person to determine if they are bound to a ticket contract?

A

Did you know there are words on the back of the ticket?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

In which example is an exemption notice binding?

A

A clear and unavoidable liability notice displayed at the entrance of a building

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Factors that have an influence on consensus are?

A
  • Mistake (Void)
  • Misrepresentation (Voidable)
  • Undue influence (Voidable)
  • Durress (Voidable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

A mistake, also referred to as an error or fault, is defined as?

A

is defined as ‘a misunderstanding or a misconception by one or more of the parties regarding certain facts, events or circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

A unilateral mistake occurs?

A

‘where only one party is mistaken, while the other party is aware of his or her mistake’

Example: Busi and Musa enter into a contract of sale. Although Busi is aware of the nature of the contract (i.e. a contract of sale), Musa is under the impression that they are entering into a contract of lease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

A common mistake, on the other hand, is a mistake?

A

‘that is shared by the parties and differs fundamentally from a unilateral or mutual mistake, because it does not lead to dissensus’

Example: Busi and Musa enter into a verbal contract of sale of a piece of land. Both parties mistakenly believe, as a matter of law, that such a verbal contract is valid and enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

A mutual mistake is a mistake?

A

‘where both parties are mistaken about each other’s intention and are at cross-purposes’

Example: Busi and Musa enter into a contract. Busi thinks that they are entering into a contract of sale, whereas Musa is under the impression that they are entering into a contract of lease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

In order for a mistake to render a contract void, it must be both relevant and material, as depicted in the following figure?

A
  • Relevant in nature + Material in Nature = Mistakes that render the contract void
39
Q

There are a variety of mistakes that are both material and relevant in nature, including but not limited to?

A
  • mistakes about the nature of the contract;
  • mistakes about the performance required from the parties; and
  • mistakes about the identity of one or more of the parties.
40
Q

What are some types of mistakes with regard to contracts?

A
  • Nature = The type of agreement (Void)
  • Performance = That which must be done in terms of
    the contract (Void)
  • Person = Mistaken identity (Void)
  • Error in motive = The reason for the mistake (Valid)
  • Name = Right person, but the wrong name (Valid)
41
Q

Misrepresentation is defined as?

A

Misrepresentation is defined as ‘a false statement of past or present fact, not law or opinion, made by one party to another before or at the time of the contract concerning some matter or circumstance relating to it’ (Hutchinson et al., 2012: 116). A misrepresentation can be made either expressly (verbally or in writing)

42
Q

Misrepresentation is defined as ‘a false statement of past or present fact, not law or opinion, made by one party?

A
  • to another before or at the time of the contract concerning some matter or circumstance relating to it.
  • misrepresentation can be made either expressly (verbally or in writing)
43
Q

Fraudulent misrepresentation refers to?

A

an instance where one party deliberately misleads another party. As such, fraudulent misrepresentation is made ‘knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly’

44
Q

A negligent misrepresentation is made?

A

‘honestly, but carelessly’

45
Q

Innocent misrepresentation is?

A

‘misrepresentation made without fraud or negligence’

46
Q

What are the types of misrepresetation?

A
  • Fraudulent
  • Negligent
  • Innocent
  • Fraudulent = The seller tells the buyer that he is selling her a solid gold ring, knowing that the ring that he is selling is a gold-plated ring. (The seller intentionally misrepresented the facts to the buyer.)
  • Negligent = The seller is a jeweller. When the buyer asks the jeweller whether the ring is a solid gold ring, the jeweller, without checking, confirms that the ring is solid gold. It later turns out that the ring is gold-plated. (The seller did not deliberately mislead the buyer. However, as a jeweller, the seller was negligent in that they ought to have checked that the ring is solid gold, and not gold-plated. In failing to check the quality of the article the jeweller was careless.)
  • Innocent = The seller is of the mistaken belief that the ring is solid gold, and tells the buyer that. The seller took every reasonable step that they could have, to ascertain the quality of the article. It turns out, however, that the ring is gold-plated. (The seller was neither intentional nor negligent in the misrepresentation. The seller took all reasonable steps that they ought to have taken, as a layperson, to determine the quality of the ring.)
47
Q

A contract that was concluded as a result of misrepresentation is voidable. In order to successfully rely on misrepresentation as a defence, how will the innocent party prove the misrepresentation?

A
  • was made by the other party;
  • was made by the other party, with the intention to induce the innocent party to enter into a contract that they would not have entered into otherwise; and
  • was material, meaning that the ‘misrepresentation is of such nature that it would have the natural and probable effect of inducing a reasonable person to enter into the contract’.
48
Q

A latent defect is?

A

a defect in the thing sold which is of such a nature that it renders it unfit for the purpose for which it was bought or which it is normally used, and which defect was not known to the buyer at the time of the conclusion of the contract, and could not be discovered by him upon a reasonable examination of the thing sold.

48
Q

A latent defect is?

A

a defect in the thing sold which is of such a nature that it renders it unfit for the purpose for which it was bought or which it is normally used, and which defect was not known to the buyer at the time of the conclusion of the contract, and could not be discovered by him upon a reasonable examination of the thing sold.

49
Q

What is one of the things the innocent party must prove in order to successfully rely on misrepresentation as a defence?

A

The misrepresentation was made by the other party

49
Q

What is one of the things the innocent party must prove in order to successfully rely on misrepresentation as a defence?

A

The misrepresentation was made by the other party

50
Q

What must a mistake be in order to render a contract void?

A

Relevant and material in nature

51
Q

Which category of mistake refers to when both parties are mistaken about each other’s intention and are at cross-purposes?

A

Mutual mistakes

52
Q

What is it called if the seller intentionally misrepresents
the facts to the buyer?

A

Fraudulent

53
Q

Which one of these factors renders a contract void?

A

Mistake

54
Q

Duress is defined as?

A

‘an unlawful threat of harm or injury, made by a party to the contract or by someone acting on his or her behalf; that causes the other party to conclude a contract’

55
Q

Duress may be?

A

expressed or implied.

56
Q

A contract that was concluded as a result of duress?

A

is voidable.

57
Q

The duress involved a coercion?

A

of the will of one party

58
Q

The fear was reasonable. This means?

A

that the ‘threat should be sufficiently grave to affect the mind of a reasonably steadfast person

59
Q

The harm or threat must be?

A
  • The harm must be imminent
  • The threat must be unlawful or contra bonos mores (i.e. against the good morals of society).
60
Q

The requirements for duress is?

A
  • Coercion
  • Reasonable Fear
  • Unlawful
  • Imminent
  • Harm/threat to bodily integrity, property and life
61
Q

Undue influence is defined as?

A

‘any improper or unfair conduct by one of the contracting parties by means of which the other contracting party is persuaded to conclude a contract with the former, contrary to the latter’s independent will’

A contract is said to be induced by “undue influence” where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.

62
Q

What are the requirements of undue influence?

A
  • Influence Exercised
  • Resolve Malleable
  • Unscrupulous manner
  • Inducement
63
Q

Anisha extends an offer to purchase Fathima’s laptop for R 1 900. Fathima misunderstands, and believes she will be renting her laptop to Anisha, when she accepts the offer. Anisha, however, believes that Fathima has agreed to sell the laptop.
Required:
1. This contract is?
2. What category of mistake was made?
3. Which legal principle is illustrated?

A
  1. Void
  2. Mutual mistake
  3. Mistake about the nature of the contract
64
Q

Sonja mistakenly believes that a painting, which is a family heirloom, is an original painting by Modigliani (a famous Italian painter). Sonja’s belief is strengthened by the fact that she has had the painting authenticated by an art expert. On the strength of Sonja’s statement, Tanja buys the painting. When Tanja takes the painting to an expert in Modigliani’s works for authentication, she is informed that the painting is a very good fake and not a real Modigliani artwork.
Required:
1. Which legal principle is illustrated?
2. This contract is: valid

A
  1. Mistake about the nature of the contract
  2. Voidable, at Tanja’s option
65
Q

When the parties are mistaken about the type of contract, the contract is?

A

voidable, at the guilty party’s option

66
Q

Andrea, a duly appointed agent of Blueberry Cheesecake (Pty) Ltd, facilitated a contract between Blueberry Cheesecake (Pty) Ltd and Chocolate Cake Ltd. Andrea persuaded Blueberry Cheesecake (Pty) Ltd to enter into this contract, although it was not hugely advantageous to Blueberry Cheesecake (Pty) Ltd. After the contract was concluded, Blueberry Cheesecake (Pty) Ltd found out that Andrea had received a ‘kick-back’ from Chocolate Cake Ltd. This contract is?

A

voidable, at the option of Blueberry Cheesecake (Pty) Ltd

67
Q

What type of misrepresentation has occurred if a person acted carelessly in making the representation?

A

Negligent

68
Q

If a contract was concluded as a result of undue influence, the contract is?

A

voidable, at the innocent party’s option

69
Q

As a general rule, an error in motive renders a contract valid. Is this statement true or false?

A

true

70
Q

Refer to question (xii). Choose the correct reason for the correct answer: (As a general rule, an error in motive renders a contract valid.)

A

Consensus is established.

71
Q

A contract that was concluded as a result of duress, is?

A

voidable, at the innocent party’s option

72
Q

Define commercial bribery?

A

A reward paid or promised by one party (i.e. the briber), to another party (i.e. the agent, who may be an agent in the true sense, or merely a go-between or facilitator) who is able to exert influence over a third party (i.e. the principal), with the intention that the agent should influence the principal, without the latter’s knowledge, and for the director or indirect benefit of the briber to enter into, or maintain or alter a contractual relationship with the briber, their principal, associate or subordinate.

73
Q

List the four requirements for undue influence?

A

The guilty party must have exercised an influence over the other party.

74
Q

List the three remedies available to the innocent party, if a contract was concluded as a result of duress?

A

The influence that was exercised rendered the innocent party’s resolve malleable.

75
Q

Define duress?

A

An unlawful threat of harm or injury, made by a party to the contract, or by someone acting on their behalf, that causes the other party to conclude and enter into the contract.

76
Q

Differentiate between a unilateral mistake and a common mistake?

A

A mutual mistake is a mistake where both parties are mistaken about each other’s intention, and are at cross-purposes.

77
Q

True or false: As a general rule, a mistake renders an agreement void?

A

True – there is no consensus

78
Q

True or false: A person who was misled into entering a contract, may, as remedy, claim delictual damages from the other party, even if the other party acted innocently in making the representation?

A

False – delictual damages may only be claimed for fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation

79
Q

True or false: It is possible to rely on duress to set a contract aside, if the party relying on duress made payment to protect their immovable property, and subsequently concluded a contract to their detriment, as a result of the extortion.

A

True – unequivocal objection, prior to making payment

80
Q

True or false: It is possible for a contracting party to rely on misrepresentation, to set aside a contract that was concluded to their detriment, even if the other party did not expressly communicate the misrepresentation to the first­mentioned party.

A

True – tacit misrepresentation

81
Q

True or false: If the correct parties enter into a contract, but the written contract wrongly reflects the name of one of the parties, the contract is void.

A

False – valid as merely a mistake of name; consensus is still established

82
Q

True or false: Undue influence renders a contract voidable.

A

True – consensus obtained improperly

82
Q

What are some of the Fundamental consumer rights, in terms of Chapter 2 of the CPA?

A
  • Part A: Right of equality in consumer market
  • Part B: Consumer’s right to privacy
  • Part D: Right to disclosure and information
  • Part E: Right to fair and responsible marketing
  • Part F: Right to fair and honest dealing
  • Part H: Right to fair value, good quality and safety
  • Part I: Supplier’s accountability to consumers
83
Q

All of the following are things the innocent party must
prove in order to successfully rely on duress, except?

A

person concerned only

84
Q

Under common law, how does duress affect a contract?

A

It makes it voidable

85
Q

What happens to a contract if undue influence has been used to form the contract, as per common law?

A

It becomes voidable

86
Q

On what basis would a contract based on commercial
bribery be set aside?

A

It was concluded wrongfully and immorally

87
Q

What are the characteristics of duress?

A

It can be expressed or implied

88
Q

What is one of the acts of the CPA?

A

The prohibition of bait marketing

89
Q

What is it called when the consumer is forced into an
agreement that occurs automatically unless the consumer specifically turns down the offer?

A

Negative-option marketing

90
Q

The Consumer Protection Act prohibits the inclusion of unfair, unjust or unreasonable terms in a contract. What happens if the court finds such terms in a contract?

A

The court can void the contract

91
Q

John uses duress to induce Angela to enter into a
contract. This contract is regulated by the provisions of
the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA).
What type of contract is this?

A

A contract that is void

92
Q

What happens if an agreement is regulated by the
Consumer Protection Act was concluded as a result of
misrepresentation, duress or undue influence?

A

It becomes void

93
Q

List the six ways in which an offer may terminate?

A

if it is revoked by the offeror before being accepted by the offeree;
- if it is rejected by the offeree;
- if the offeree makes a counter-offer;
- if one of the parties becomes legally incapacitated (for example, if the offeror is diagnosed with a mental illness);
- by the effluxion of time – i.e. if an offer was only open for a period of time, and the offeree failed to accept the offer within the prescribed time period; or
- by the death of either the offeror or the offeree.