conscience test Flashcards
Give 2 or 3 examples of moral decisions Sophie made in the film.
Her decision to distribute leaflets, face interrogation, and accept responsibility for her actions were all moral decisions in the film.
Explain Sophie’s understanding of conscience.
She sees her conscience as a guiding force that compels her to act against injustice, no matter what the personal consequences are.
Which levels of moral development (Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development) does Sophie operate from throughout the course of the four days (from the time she is arrested to her execution)? Do we see her change? Explain.
She demonstrates stages 5 and 6 of moral development. She does not change throughout the film, remaining calm and committed to her values.
Compare and contrast Sophie’s moral development (based on Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development and Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs) with Inspector Mohr and the trial judge. Make sure you explain your reasons for identifying their moral stages as you did.
Sophie operates from stages 5 and 6, following a moral code based on sacrificing her life for human rights. Inspector Mohr operates from stage 4, focusing on the importance of following rules and laws. The trial judge operates from stage 3, only following the general Nazi ideals at the time, with no respect for morality.
Which virtues does Sophie demonstrate? Explain your choices.
She demonstrates justice for advocating against Hitler, fortitude for having the courage to go against popular beliefs, and hope for believing that there is a better future for everyone.
How does Sophie’s faith sustain her during her last four days?
Sophie keeps her faith during her final days by staying hopeful and true to her moral beliefs.
What are the take-away messages you have from viewing this film? Are the messages applicable to today? Why or why not?
The messages to take away from this film include to always make the moral decision instead of following society’s expectations. This is still applicable today because it can happen in any situation.
Compare and contrast the choices of the young men in the Penn State (and other hazing incidents) with the choices of Sophie and Hans Scholl.
Both situations dealt with the ideas of morality and conformity. In the film, they decided to go against popular belief and do what was right. However, in the Penn State hazing situation, each member of the fraternity was influenced by peer pressure and did not do the right thing by helping the dying man. The same thing happened with taking responsibility for their actions in each situation.
Martyr
A witness ready to suffer and even die for truth and virtue; martyrdom is the ultimate act of fortitude.
wisdom
the ability to exercise good judgment. It is grounded in common sense and comes from life experience, thoughtful reflection, and learning life’s lessons
understanding
the gift of intelligence and enlightenment. It is the ability to perceive, comprehend, and interpret information; to have insight and discern meaning
counsel
good advice. It is the ability to teach and inform, guide and direct, warn and admonish, recommend and encourage
fortitude
an unwavering commitment to God or a proper course of action, and it shows itself is moral strength, courage, determination, patient endurance, long suffering, a resolute spirit, stamina, and resiliency
knowledge
the ability to study and learn; to acquire, retain, and master a wide spectrum of information; and to put it to good use for constructive purposes
fear of the Lord
awe, reverence, and respect for God. It downplays human self-sufficiency and acknowledges that everything comes from God. Consequently, those who “Fear the Lord” gladly offer their praise, worship, and adoration to God alone
piety
the only gift not part of Isaiah’s original list. Piety is personal holiness, the ability to live a decent life, free of sin, devoted to God, and obedient to God’s will
positive peer pressure
something in your best interest
negative peer pressure
something not in your best interest
Hazing
the imposition of strenuous, often humiliating, tasks as part of a program of rigorous physical training and initiation.
Conscience
“The awareness of a moral or ethical aspect to one’s conduct together with the urge to prefer right over wrong.”
What conscience is
Conscience is awareness of God’s call to be.
Conscience is awareness of God’s call to know and do the good, that is, to love.
Conscience is a practical judgment of the intellect.
What conscience is not
Conscience as majority opinion.
Surrenders personal responsibility to the group
Conscience as a feeling.
Individuals are the creators of their own moral rules and answerable only to themselves.
Conscience as a superego. (Freud)
We feel guilty because of psychological preconditioning related to feelings of moral approval or disapproval.
We carry the “shoulds” and “have-tos” from the authority figures in our lives.
We followed these rules because we wanted approval (love) from these figures, not because we personally understood the value of the rules.
Conscience as gut-instinct.
“This feels right.” But, we also need to apply our intellect and judgment. “Does this choice reflect love of self, others, and God?”
This type of conscience is more of a reaction than a proactive response.
Conscience as “Jiminy Cricket.”
An internal voice, a separate person who lives inside of us, dictating to us what we should do.
Conscience as myth.
Some deny the existence of conscience – “fake concept” created by religions to control people through guilt.
Do your own thing; little regard for the rights of others.
character
Who we really are and who we are becoming through our choices and actions