Conformity: Types and explanations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who suggested the three types of conformity?

A
  • Herbert Kelman
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three types of conformity?

A
  • Internalisation
  • Identification
  • Compliance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is internalisation?

A
  • Internalisation occurs when a person genuinely accepts the groups norms.
  • This results in a private and public change in opinions and behaviour
    -This change is permanent and persists even in the absence of other group members
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is identification?

A
  • Conforming because we value membership in the group and care about their values and beliefs
  • this means we publicly change our opinions even if we privately do not agree with what the group stands for
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is compliance?

A
  • This is the weakest form of conformity and only results in a superficial change
  • We conform publicly but privately we do not change our personal opinions in order to fit in
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who developed ISI and NSI?

A
  • Deutsch and Gerard
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • What is ISI and NSI?
A
  • A two process theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is ISI?

A
  • informational social influence
  • This is when we conform in order to be right and not appear dumb
  • This is likely to occur in situations which are ambiguous and where decisions need to made quickly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What type of process is ISI?

A
  • A cognitive process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What type of change does ISI bring?

A
  • A permanent change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is NSI?

A
  • normative social influence
  • This is when we conform to not appear foolish and to gain social approval from others rather than rejection
  • This occurs in more stressful situations where people have a greater need for social support
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What type of change does NSI cause?

A
  • A temporary change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What type of process is NSI?

A
  • an emotional process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a strength of NSI?

A
  • NSI has research support. For example, Asch interviewed his participants and said that they conformed as they were self - conscious and gave the wrong answers due to fear of disapproval
  • When participants wrote the answers down, conformity fell to 12.5%
  • This was because there was less pressure and not a chance for rejection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a strength of ISI?

A
  • There is research support by Todd lucas
  • Lucas et al found that participants conformed more when maths problems were difficult.
  • This is also because the situation was ambigous
  • Therefore, ISI is a valid explanation of conformity as the results are what ISI predicted
    Counterpoint: It may be unclear whether NSI or ISI is at work. This is because in Asch’s study, conformity was reduced when there was another dissenting participant. The dissenter may reduce the power of NSI (social support) or reduce the power of ISI (alternative source of information). Therefore, it is hard to seperate NSI and ISI as they may operate together
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a limitation of NSI?

A
  • There may be individual differences in NSI
  • For example, Mcghee and Tavern found that some people seek more social support and have a greater concern with being liked
  • Some people are nAffiliators and are more likely to conform
  • This shows that individual differences may not be explained by a general theory