conformity to social roles Flashcards

1
Q

definition of social roles

A

parts individuals play when they belong to social group

conformity to social roles occurs when people behave in certain ways because they feel it is expected of them in that role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment

A

Philip Zimbardo and colleagues wanted to answer question-do prison guards behave brutally because they have sadistic personalities or is the situation that creates that behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Zimbardo Stanford prison experiment procedure

A

used 24 male participants

set up mock prison in psychology department at Stanford University

advertised students willing to volunteer and chose those who deemed emotionally stable after also several psychological testing

students chosen randomly assigned role of guards or prisoners

heighten relaism, prisoners were arresred in homes by police abd delivered to prison

blindfolded, strip searched and issued number and uniform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

findings of Zimbardo Stanford Prison experiment

A

guards took up roles with enthusiasm

their behaviour became threat to prisoners health

study stopped after 6 days instead of the intended 14 days

within 2 days, prisoners rebelled against their harsh treatment by the guards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

conclusion

A

revealed power of the situation to influence peoples behaviour

guards, prisoners and researchers all conformed to their roles within the study

roles very easily taken on by participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

weakness of Zimbardo Stanford prison experiment

A

lacks ethical issues

criticized for breaking ethical guidelines

particular, protection from harm

five prisoners left early due to the reactions of the physical and mental torment

guards reported feelings of guilt and anxiety from their actions

Zimbardo acknowledged should have been stopped earlier

weakness as suggests he was responding more as superintendent of prison rather then being responsible to his participants as researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strength of Zimbardo Stanford prison experiment

A

control

controlled variables in his study

e.g. able to control selection of participants

emotionally stable pps were recruited and given role as either prisoner or guard

way to try and rule out individual personality difference

if guards and prisoners acted differently, but in roles by chance then the reason for their behaviour must be due to pressure of situation

strength as having control increases internal validity of the study
therefore, can be more confident in drawing conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

aim of Milgram study

A

to see whether people would obey and inflict harm on another person using electric shocks, by following orders of an authority figure

see whether individual had potential to cause harm like Germans and Nazis or if they were different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

procedure of milgram study

A

recruited 40 male participants through newspapers and flyers from post

ad said-looking for participants for a study about memory

pps recurited were aged between 20-50 years

jobs ranged from unskilled to professional

offered 4.50 to take part (reasonable amount in 1960s)

got there, paid straight away
put as learner
true participant=teacher
experimenter=another confederate dressed in lab coat played by actor

participants told could leave study at any time they want

leaner strapped in chair and wired with electrodes

teacher required to give learner an increasingly severe electric shock every time leaner made mistake on leanring task (learning word pairs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

findings of milgrams study

A

no participants stopped below 300 volts

five partcipants (12.5%) stopped at 300 volts

65% continued to highest shock level of 450 volts

qualtive data was collected

3 participants had uncontrolled seizures (full blown)

Milgram asked 14 psychology students to predict participants behaviour

estimated no more then 3% of participants would continue to 450 volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

conclusion of Milgram’s study

A

84% of participants were glad they took part in study as learnt something about themselves

concluded German people are NOT different

participants were willing to obey orders even if it meant harming people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

weakness of milgrams study

A

lacks population validity

Milgram used biased sample of 40 male American volunteers from an individualist society

unable to generalise to other populations, especially collectivist cultures or to explain behaviour of females

cannot be concluded that females may respond differently in Milgrams study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strength of milgrams studt

A

supporting replication-has been replicated in real life settings

e.g Hofling conducted study in hospital

nurses were telephoned by Dr smith who asked if they could adminstrate a drug to a patient

order went against hospital regulations as
the nurses are not suppose to take instructions over phone

instructions were from unknown doctor

dosage of drug was twice the advised on the bottle

overall, 21 out of 22 (95%) nurses did as requested

strength as shows obedience to authority figures does take place in real life settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly