Conflicts of Laws Flashcards
Conditions for Recognition of Judgments Question
1) A judgment has been entered by a court in one jurisdiction; and
2) A party is seeking to have that judgment recognized by a court in a different jurisdiction
Sister State Recognition Questions
1) Are the requirements for Full Faith and Credit satisfied?
2) Are there any defenses?
Sister State Recognition: Are the Requirements for Full Faith and Credit Satisfied?
1) Jurisdiction - The rendering state must have had jurisdiction over the parties and jurisdiction over the subject matter
>Exception - Where the issue of jurisdiction has been fully and fairly litigated, the jurisdictional determination is itself entitled to full faith and credit.
2) On the merits - The judgment entered by the rendering state must have been on the merits.
>Note - a default judgment treats all factual contentions as admitted and is therefore on the merits for full faith and credit recognition of judgment purposes.
3) Finality - The judgment entered by the rendering court must be a final judgment.
Sister State Recognition: Are there any Defenses to Full Faith and Credit?
The following are valid defenses to full faith and credit:
1) Penal Judgments - a penal judgment is not entitled to full faith and credit.
>Except tax judgments
2) Extrinsic Fraud - A judgment obtained by extrinsic fraud is not entitled to full faith and credit. Extrinsic fraud is fraud that could not be corrected during the regular course of proceedsing leading to the judgment.
Foreign Judgment Recognition
If the rendering court is a foreign country, then the source of the obligation to recognize the judgment is comity or treaty.
Comity - A recognizing court will exercise discretion to decide whther the foregin judgment should be recognized. Many of the same principals as full faith and credit will be considered.
Conditions for Choice of Law Questions
1) The lawsuit involves factual connections with multiple states; and
2) The multiple states will have different laws leading to different results.
Restrictions on Choice of Law
1) Constitutional - The Constitution imposes a limit only is a state’s law is chosen that has no significant contact with and/or legitimate interest in the litigation.
2) Statutory - If the forum state has a statute that directs a choice of law, then the forum court shoudl apply that statute instead of the usual choice of law approach.
Choice of Law: Analytical Approaches
1) Vested rights approach of the First Restatement
2) The most significant relationship approach of the Second Restatement
3) The interest analysis (governmental interest) approach
Choice of Law: Vested Rights Approach of the First Restatement
1) Characterize the area of substantive law
2) Determine the particular choice of law rule
3) Localizing the rule to be applied
Choice of Law: Most Significant Relationship Approach of the Second Restatement
Seeks to identify the state having the most significant relationship with respect to the issue at hand and then apply that state’s law on that issue.
Consider the connecting facts in a given case and whether the policy-ordiented principles should be considered.
Choice of Law: Interest Analysis (Governmental Interest) Approach
Start with the assumption that the forum will apply its own law. Then, you consider whether the forum has any interest in the litigation; if not, it is a “false conflict” situation and the forum will apply the law of the second state. A question arises when both the forum and the second state have interests; this is a “true conflict” situation.
Choice of Law: Basic Structure of a Choice of Law Answer
Three basic paragraphs to a choice of law answer:
1) State the issue and identify the choice of law approach.
2) Describe the choice of law approach.
3) Apply the choice of law approach.
Choice of Law: Paragraph One of Answer
The issue presented is which state’s law will govern the outcome of this litigation. The governing law will be selected by the forum court using the (fill in applicable choice of law approach).”
Choice of Law: Paragraphs 2 & 3: Vested Rights
“Under this approach the court will apply the law of that state mandadted by the applicable vesting rule. That rule is selected according to the relevant substantive area of law.”
(1) categorize the substantive area of law, (2) applicable vesting rule, (3) determine governing law, and (4) determine the result.
Choice of Law: Paragraphs 2 & 3: Interest Analysis
“Under this approach the court will consider which states have a legitimate interest in the outcom eof the litigation. The forum court will apply its own law as long as it has a legitimate interest. If the forum state has no legitimate interest, it will apply the law of another interested state.”
(1) which states have legitimate interests, (2) characterize the type of conflict (true/false), (3) choose the governing law based on the type of conflict, and (4) apply the governing law to determine the result.