Conflicts of Law Flashcards
Requirements for Full Faith and Credit Clause
(1) rendering state had jurisdiction over the parties + subject matter, (2) judgment entered was on the merits, and (3) judgment was final
Examples of Judgments Not on the Merits
dismissals based on: (i) lack of jurisdiction [personal or subject matter], (ii) misjoinder, (iii) improper venue, (iv) statute of limitations, and (v) failure to state a claim [look for prejudice]
Defenses to Full Faith and Credit
(i) penal judgments and (ii) judgments obtained by extrinsic fraud
Extrinsic Fraud
fraud that could not be corrected during the regular course of proceedings leading to the judgment
Comity
under the principles of comity, a recognizing court will exercise discretion to decide whether the foreign judgment should be recognized
Choice of Law in Transferred Diversity Cases
when a diversity case is filed in a proper venue, and the case is transferred within the federal system, the federal court applies the choice of law approach of the original [transferor] court; when the case is filed in an improper venue or filed in defiance of a forum selection clause, the law of the transferee court will apply
Vested Rights [Traditional] Approach
Under this approach, the court will apply the law of that state mandated by the applicable vesting rule; that rule is selected according to the relevant substantive area of law
Interest Analysis
Under this approach, the court will consider which states have a legitimate interest in the outcome of the litigation; the forum court will apply its own law as long as it has a legitimate interest; if the forum state has no legitimate interest, it will apply the law of another interested state [starts with assumption that forum will apply its own law]
Most Significant Relationship
Under this approach the court will apply the law of the state which is most significantly related to the outcome of the litigation; to determine this, the court will consider connecting facts and policy principles
First Restatement [Vested Rights] Vesting Rule for Torts
the governing law is the law where the injury occurred
Second Restatement [Most Significant Relationship] Considerations for Torts
factual connections: place (1) of injury, (2) of the conduct causing the injury, (3) where the parties are at home, and (4) where the relationship, if any, is centered
policy principles: (1) the relevant policies of the forum state and (2) the relevant policies of other connected states
For all 3 approaches, governing law for tort case will almost always be the law of the place of injury except
under the two modern approaches [interest analysis and most significant relationship], exception kicks in when the rule at issue is a loss distribution rule + the parties share a common domicile; then apply the law of the common domicile
A contractual choice of law provision will be enforced if
it is (i) valid + (ii) express
Reasons to find a choice of law provision invalid
(i) the law selected has no reasonable relationship to the contract, or (ii) the provision was included without true mutual consent
First Restatement Vesting Rules for Contracts
(1) if the case is about formation [capacity, contractual formalities, consideration], apply the law of the place of contracting
(2) if the case is about performance [time, place, manner of performance, excuses], apply the law of the place of performance