Conflicts of Law Flashcards
How many domiciles can a person have?
Only 1
How can domicile be acquired?
By choice or by law
To acquire domicile by choice…
Presence + intent to remain
- Person must abandon previous domicile,
- establish physical presence at chosen one, and
- have an intent to remain there for indefinite time
How is intent to remain shown?
Person’s actions and statements taken as a whole.
Ex: real estate, voting, paying taxes, setting up bank account, registering car there–all relevant, but none conclusive by itself
To establish physical presence…
Person needs to be physically present, but no timing requirement as long as combined by intent
What is domicile by law?
When person doesn’t have legal capacity to choose their domicile, law chooses it for them.
Ex: children
Domicile for corporation generally…
Where they are incorporated, but principal place of business may be relevant.
Choice of law issue exists whenever…
the laws of more than jx arguably apply to same set of facts.
What is the forum state?
State in which the lawsuit is brought. Law of that state is call forum law.
What is the law of the other state called (non-forum state)?
Foreign law
What will a jx look to in deciding which law to apply?
Their forum law (unless fed statute otherwise?)
3 general approaches to choice of law:
- traditional/1st restatement approach
- gov interest/interest analysis approach
- most significant relationship/2nd restatement approach
If approach not specified, discuss all 3 briefly
Traditional/1st restatement approach:
Territorial approach: Each state determines legal effect of only events that occurred within its territory.
As soon as legally significant event occurs, legal right vests under the law of the state in which that legally sig event occurred.
Court just has to figure out where right vested (where legally significant event occurred) and just apply that law.
A legal right vests where…
the last act occurred necessary to give P a cause of action (last act requirement).
Governmental interest analysis/interest analysis:
Law applies to set of facts if its app to those facts would promote underlying purposes of the law. That state said to be interested in the case.
If only one of the states truly interested, then false conflict, apply law of interested state.
If true conflict, classic solution is for court to apply its own law (forum state). No balancing.
If neither truly interested (unprovided for case), apply law of the forum.
Conduct regulating laws are…
laws designed to reg people’s conduct.
Most laws are this.
Loss-shifting laws definition
simply determine who can or cannot be made to pay for losses caused by wrongful conduct.
Ex: immunity from suit, vicarious liability rule, etc.
Under interest analysis, states have interest in apply conduct reg law whenever…
it occurs within territory of state or causes injury there or when it injures one of their domiciliaries regardless of where it occurred.
Under interest analysis, states have interest in applying loss-shifting laws whenever…
applying it would benefit one of their domiciliaries
Most significant relationship/2nd restatement approach:
Adopted by about half of the states.
Apply law of the state that has most significant relationship of particular issue in question.
If it’s a true toss-up, safe bet is to apply law of forum state.
What counts as a significant relationship between a state and particular issue in question?
2nd restatement 7 guiding principles:
SEE OUTLINE
Basically:
- Promotion of the relevant policies
- Protecting systemic interests (like CUPS: certainty, uniformity, predictability, simplicity).
- Protecting justified expectations of parties (applies only to planned transactions, like trusts, real prop, etc…not neg torts, etc.)
What is depesage?
Application of diff states’ laws to diff issues within a single case
What is renvoi?
When court applies law of another state, applies whole law of that state, including that state’s choice of law rules (accepting the renvoi vs. rejecting the renvoi).
Rule about renvoi
All three approaches to choice of law generally reject the renvoi.
Exception: Issues involving prop rights in land and interests in land, courts generally accept the renvoi.
Under traditional approach, tort usually occurs at…
place of injury (because usually last element for cause of action).
Under significant relationship approach and torts case, contacts to take into account are…
- place where injury occurred
- place where conduct causing injury occurred
- domicile resident’s place of incorporation or place of business of the parties
- place where relationship btw parties, if any, centered
weighed wrt relative importance wrt relevant issue
What is the presumption under the significant relationship approach for a tort case?
Law of place of injury usually applies in tort cases.
What if parties’ contract contains a choice of law clause?
Generally free to choose the law, so generally enforce (rule of party autonomy).
Exception: Validity of contract cannot be resolved solely by parties’ choice of law (ex: illegality of subject matter, incapacity to contract, absence of necessary formalities for contract formation). Second restatement: Parties may still choose law to be applied here if chosen state has a sub relationship to parties or transaction, or some other reasonable basis for the choice. But even if this satisfied, still ignored if app of that law would be contrary to fundamental policy of state with most significant relationship to issue.
What if parties don’t make choice of law or make an effective one in contracts context under traditional approach?
Law of place of contracting will govern issues of contract formation, interp or validity.
Place of contracting = where last act to give COA, so usually place of acceptance
Exception: Issues related to performance o contract governed by law of the place of performance.
What contacts are taken into account under second restatement approach for a contracts case?
- Place of contracting, negotiation and performance
- Place where subject matter of contract located
- Location of parties’ domiciles, residences, nationalities, places of incorp or business
Second restatement presumption for contract cases?
If location of negotiation and performance same, law of that state usually applies.
What types of properties are immovables vs. movables?
Immovables: Land and interest in land (including leaseholds)
Movables: Everything else
Rules for immovables
Same under both restatements.
All issues regarding immovable prop governed by law of place where prop located (the situs).
Still look at 7 guiding principles, but most important is protection of justified expectations of the parties.
Presumption in favor of applying law of the situs is very strong.
When court applies law of the state where real prop located, it ____ the renvoi, meaning…
Accepts the renvoi (exception); it applies the whole law of that state, including their choice of law rules.
Tangible movables include…
painting, furniture, boat