Conflicts Flashcards

1
Q

Give some reasons for conservation conflicts

A
  • Growing human influence into most ecosystems
  • Competition over limited resources
  • Differing value systems
  • Conservation success
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 types of conflicts

A

Human / wildlife
Direct interactions between people and wildlife

Biodiversity conflicts
Arguments between people seeking to conserve species and those other goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the human/carnivore conflict

A
  • Carnviore threatens: human life, economics, recreation
  • Restoring habitat can bring carnivores closer to human settlements

Examples:
India: people are losing a large proportion of livestock to large carnivores
- Each household loosing 12% of total holding to large felines

Europe: Meta analysis on bears and wolves in
- Younger / more educated people tended to have a more positive view, compared to farmers and hunters (who’d experienced damage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the conservation conflict between hen harriers and red grouse populations

A
  • Hen harriers (scarce) vs. red grouse (common).
  • Harriers threaten red grouse populations, impacting grouse shooting (economic losses of ~£100K/yr per moor)

Heather Moorland Management:
- Includes burning heather, controlling parasites, and predators of grouse.
- Harrier populations limited mainly by illegal killing, despite legal protections in the UK.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the solutions to the Hen harrier vs red grouse conflict?

A
  • Diversionary feeding: Provide alternate food sources for harriers.
  • Lethal control: Legal limit on harrier densities (preferred by hunters).
  • Conservationist stance: Oppose any control, preferring natural population dynamics.

Key point: Lack of agreement perpetuates illegal killing of raptors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline the causes of the Hedgehogs and Ground-Nesting Birds conflict

A
  • Issue: Hedgehogs introduced to remote Outer Hebrides islands caused a population boom (from 4 to >5,000).
  • Impact: Decline in internationally important wading bird breeding colonies.
  • Cause: Ecological evidence clearly links hedgehogs to bird declines.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline the response and conflict of the Hedgehogs and Ground-Nesting Birds conflict

A
  • Solution by Scottish National Heritage (SNH): Cull the hedgehogs.
  • Protests: Animal rights groups, celebrities, and media opposed the cull.
  • Language of Conflict:
    Animal rights groups used emotive language to oppose the cull.
    Substantial differences in language used by conservationists vs. animal rights activists.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the New Zealand approach to invasive species like?

A
  • Pretty happy to cull invasive predators on islands
  • Scheme for predator free NZ by 2050
  • Have had success with this approach, with benefits for rare birds breeding on islands
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What tend to be the 2 viewpoints in conservation conflicts ?

A
  • Valuing a wildlife spectacle (rights of species) (Conservationists)
  • Valuing the rights of individual animals (animal rights groups)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline the ‘Sod the Cod’ conflict

A
  • 2004 North Sea Cod Recovery Programme (CRP) introduced measures (e.g quotas) to address massive cod stock decline due to overfishing
  • Created conflict:
    Cod is God → conservationists, prioritize cod recovery for long-term sustainability
    Sod the Cod → fisheries, prioritise economic and social impact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline how the ‘sod the cod’ conflict was (partially) resolved

A

2007 Cod symposium

Agreements:
- Cod decline due to overfishing, but environ factors also
- At least some recovery of north sea cod possible
- Any recovery plan should not impinge on sustainable fisheries for other stocks
- Movement in the right direction more important than hitting specific biomass targets

Disagreed (some values cannot be resolved)
- Fishers favoured increased quotas, to avoid discarding mature cod
- Conservationists: all scientific evidence points to much less fishing effort if cod stocks are to recover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define the Rashomon effect

A

Differing interpretations of the same event by various stakeholders, leading to conflicts.

= Recognizing and addressing these divergent perspectives is crucial for effective conservation strategies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give some examples of conflicts between animal rights groups and conservation biologists.

Did they find a solution?

A

Perry & Perry (2007)
- Gray squirrels in Italy – Legal opposition blocked culling, allowing non-native squirrels to replace native red squirrels.
- Mute swans in Vermont – Lawsuits prevented lethal control, despite environmental damage concerns.
- Feral pigs in Texas – Cooperation between animal rights groups and managers led to a successful control program (using hunting, trapping and fencing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the chimpanzee conflict between conservationists and rural villagers in Western Africa

A
  • Colonial-era land seizures left conservation areas in the hands of elites, excluding rural communities.
  • Villagers were removed for conservation, leading to resentment toward wildlife protections.
  • Poverty forces locals into bushmeat hunting/ illegal trade, while conservation efforts benefit elites.
  • Mistrust – Policies ignoring historical injustices = resistance
  • Solution: Equitable conservation that includes local voices, economic opportunities, and historical awareness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly