Conflict theory Flashcards
Conflict
Theorists see society as being based on the interests of one powerful group which imposes and marginalises others in society
Karl Marx
Marx travelled through Europe during the mid and then half of the 19th century where he witnessed much poverty and inequality.
He explained what he has through unequal access to resources and ownership of property
Two social classes according to Marx
Capitalist class ( Bourgeoisie):
- own and control the wealth of a country
-these control
the productive forces in society (the
economic base), which consisted of land,
factories and machines that could be used to produce
goods that could then be sold for a profit.
Workint class ( Proletariat)
-can only gain a living by selling their labour
power to the bourgeoisie for a price,whether this is
physical products or emotional labour. (Hochschild)
Relationship between Proletariat and Bourgeoisie
-relationship between the two classes is exploitative; the amount of money capitalists pay their workers is always below the current selling or market price of whatever they produce (surplus value)
- capitalists extract surplus value from
the worker ansd because of this , the capitalist class is only able
to maintain and increase their wealth at the expense of the
proletariat
-to Marx, profit is the accumulated
exploitation of workers in capitalist society.
Economic power = ultimate control
-accroding to Marx, those who control the Economic Base
also control the Superstructure
( those who have
wealth or economic power also have political power and
control over the rest of society)
-Economic base ( the Mode of Production):
forces
of production (tools, machinery, raw materials which
people use to produce goods and services)and the
relations of production (social relations between people
involved in the production of goods and services).
-Superstructure:
all other institutions: the legal system,
the mass media, education etc.
Crtitiques of Marxism
- concept of social class is too simplistic, as in our current society there aren’t just two social classes, but more
-capitalism became less exploitative
- marxism ignores gender inequality and it doesn’t consider why women are opressed
Feminism
-political movement
-inequality between men and women is universal and the most significant form of inequality
- patriarchy is the main cause of gender inequality
-gender norms are not decided biologically, so it means that they can be changed
Radical Feminists
- take the approach that ‘all men are bad’
-they look at the problem of men and male domination that was caused by the patriarchy
- they assume that patriarchy and sex class hold central significance in terms of analysis of male/female relationship
-patriarchy➡️ the main form of inequality in society
Firestone (1972)
-argues that that womens’ biology is a basis for their inequality and domination by men
Greer (2007)
- supports the idea that all men are bad
- she argues that many relationships between men and women in contemporary society remain highly patriarchal and exploitative
Critique of Radical Feminists
- they ignore other reasons for inequality such as class and ethnicity
Marxist Feminists
- take the approach that ‘only some men are bad ‘
- class is the biggest reason for inequality
- they put emphasis on how women are being exploited as workers and as women in society & at home
-they look at the connection between capitalism and the subordination of women
- focus on emacipatory, critical framework that aims at understanding & explaining gender oppresion in a systematic wat
Critique of Marxist Feminists
- they don’t account for non-capitalist countries where patriarchy is still an issue e.g. China
Liberal Feminists
- focus on measures ensuring that women have equal opportunities with men within the present social system
- view society as false in the belief that women are less capable
- they acknowledge the differences between men and women have lessened since the Equal Pay Act (1970) and the Sex Discrimination Act (1978)
- they look at laws and ideas to eliminate inequalities, however these aren’t things that can happen quickly or guarantee that social change will happen, so as a whole their approach is fairly optymistic
Critique of Liberal Feminists
- Walby: argues that they provide no exact explenation for the overall structures of gender inequalities