Conflict Of Laws Set Flashcards

1
Q

Which state’s law will govern with respect to the inheritance of real property in a will?

A The state where the testator was domiciled at death.

B The state where the will was executed.

C The state where the land is located.

D The state where the will is probated.

A

C

The law of the situs (where the land is located) will govern the inheritance of real property, in both the context of wills and intestacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which state’s law will govern the inheritance of personal property in the case of intestacy (i.e., where there is no valid will)?

A The state where the decedent died.

B The state where the decedent was domiciled at death.

C The state where the personal property is located.

D The state where the will is probated.

A

B

The devolution (transfer) of personal property is ordinarily governed by the law of the decedent’s domicile at the date of death. That rule is virtually always followed in the case of intestacy and is usually followed in cases where there is a valid will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In a federal civil action based on diversity jurisdiction, the federal court will apply which choice of law approach?

A The First Restatement (vested rights) approach.

B The Second Restatement (most significant relationship) approach.

C The Interest Analysis (governmental interest) approach.

D The same approach used by the state courts of the forum state.

A

D

Under the Erie Doctrine, a federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction must employ the same choice of law approach as that used by the state courts of the forum state. See Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co., 313 U.S. 487 (1941).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Under the Second Restatement (most significant relationship) approach for choice of law, which of the following is the presumption (or default rule) for most tort cases?

A The law of the place of injury.

B The law of the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred.

C The law of the plaintiff’s domicile.

D The law of the defendant’s domicile.

A

A

Under the Second Restatement approach, the presumption or default rule is that the law of the place of injury will govern in most tort cases, unless another state can be demonstrated to have a more significant relationship to the litigation at issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Under the First Restatement (vested rights) approach for choice of law, which state’s law will govern in most tort cases?

A The law of the forum state.

B The law of the state where the injury occurred.

C The law of the state where the plaintiff is domiciled.

D The law of the state where the defendant is domiciled.

A

B

Under the First Restatement (vested rights) approach, the court will choose the law of the state which was the place of the wrong. For almost all torts, the law of the place of the wrong is defined as the place of injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The law of the ____________________ generally governs choice of law issues involving real property.

A Actus Reus.

B Terra Fides.

C Terra Contractus.

D Situs.

A

D

For questions related to real property, the law of the situs is almost always applied. This is true regardless of the choice of law approach adopted by the forum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which choice of law approach is also known as the “most significant relationship” approach?

A The First Restatement approach.

B The Second Restatement approach.

C The Better Law approach.

D The Lex Fori approach.

A

B

The Second Restatement approach to choice of law is also known as the “most significant relationship” approach. The First Restatement approach is also known as the “vested rights” approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Under choice of law principles, the parties to a contract are ____________________ allowed to specify the law that governs their own contractual relationship.

A Always.

B Frequently.

C Rarely.

D Never.

A

B

Parties to a contract are normally allowed to specify the law that governs their contractual relationship through a choice of law provision, provided none of the following exceptions apply: (i) the law chosen by the parties cannot contradict a fundamental policy of a state with a materially greater interest than the chosen state; (ii) the law chosen by the parties cannot contradict a policy of the most interested state unless the parties or transaction has a substantial relationship to the chosen state; or (iii) the contractual agreement to choose the governing law must not have been the product of fraud, mistake, or coercion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Judgments from foreign countries are often recognized and enforced in the United States as a matter of:

A Full faith and credit.

B Renvoi.

C Comity.

D Universalism.

A

C

Foreign country judgments are not entitled to full faith and credit but are often recognized and enforced in the United States as a matter of comity (voluntary recognition). Renvoi is a choice of law concept that refers to a forum’s use of another state’s choice of law principles to select the applicable law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is required for a person to change her state of domicile?

A Physical presence in the state only.

B The intent to remain in the state permanently or for an indefinite period only.

C Physical presence in the state combined with the intent to remain permanently or for an indefinite period in the state.

D Registering to vote and changing one’s state identification in the new state.

A

C

Domicile by choice for individuals requires physical presence in the state and the intent to remain in the state permanently or for an indefinite period. Registered to vote and changing one’s state identification constitute good evidence showing a person’s intent to remain in a state, but are not absolutely required for a bona fide change of domicile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

With respect to domicile, at any given time an individual may have:

A Only one domicile.

B No more than two domiciles.

C One domicile for her place of work and one for her primary residence.

D As many domiciles as residences.

A

A

An individual may not have more than one domicile at any given time. An individual is domiciled in the state she considers to be her primary home, provided the individual has established a physical presence in the state in conjunction with her intention to be domiciled there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A divorce issued by a court that lacks personal jurisdiction over an absent spouse would be referred to as:

A A no fault divorce.

B A simplified divorce.

C An ex parte divorce.

D A collaborative divorce.

A

C

A divorce based on the domicile of only one of the spouses is an ex parte divorce. In the context of an ex parte divorce, the other spouse need not be present and personal jurisdiction is not required over the absent spouse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which of the following is a jurisdictional predicate required for a court to issue a valid divorce decree entitled to full faith and credit?

A One of the spouses must be domiciled in the state granting the divorce.

B Both of the spouses must be domiciled in the state granting the divorce.

C Both spouses must be present at the proceedings where the divorce is granted.

D The granting state must have personal jurisdiction over both spouses.

A

A

Only one of the spouses must be domiciled in the state granting the divorce in order for the divorce decree to be entitled to full faith and credit. Both spouses need not be present at the divorce proceedings, and personal jurisdiction over an absent spouse is not required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which of the following is a jurisdictional predicate required for a valid child custody order?

A Both parents must be domiciled in the state making the custody determination.

B The state making the custody determination must be the child’s state of birth.

C The state making the custody determination must be the child’s home state, as defined by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act.

D The state making the custody determination must be the child’s permanent state of residence, as defined by Supreme Court case law.

A

C

Pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”), a child custody determination may only be made in the child’s home state, defined in the statute as the state where the child has lived for the last six months. The UCCJEA applies alternate provisions in the event there is no state that can be classified as the child’s home state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The traditional approach is to treat statutes of limitation as ____________________, meaning the forum will typically apply ____________________.

A Substantive; the statute of limitations of the state selected by the forum’s choice of law approach.

B Substantive; its own statute of limitations.

C Procedural; the statute of limitations of the state selected by the forum’s choice of law approach.

D Procedural; its own statute of limitations.

A

D

Traditionally, statutes of limitation have been treated as procedural issues, so the forum will apply its own statute of limitations unless an exception applies (e.g., the forum has a borrowing statute).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The modern trend is to treat statutes of limitation as ____________________, meaning the forum will typically apply ____________________.

A Substantive; the statute of limitations of the state selected by the forum’s choice of law approach.

B Substantive; its own statute of limitations.

C Procedural; the statute of limitations of the state selected by the forum’s choice of law approach.

D Procedural; its own statute of limitations.

A

A

The modern trend is to treat statutes of limitation as substantive issues and to apply the statute of limitations of the state chosen by the forum’s choice of law approach. If the forum applies the Second Restatement approach, for example, it will select the statute of limitations of the state with the most significant relationship to the litigation.

17
Q

Under the First Restatement (vested rights) approach for choice of law, the place of ____________________ provides the governing law for issues related to the validity and enforceability of a contract, whereas the place of ____________________ provides the governing law for issues related to the performance of a contract.

A Negotiation; plaintiff’s domicile.

B Negotiation; performance.

C Contracting (where the contract was made); plaintiff’s domicile.

D Contracting (where the contract was made); performance.

A

D

Under the First Restatement (vested rights) approach to choice of law, the state of the place of contracting (where the contract was made) governs issues related to validity and enforceability such as contractual capacity, contractual formalities, consideration, and defenses to validity such as fraud, coercion, and duress. The state of the place of performance, by contrast, governs issues related to the performance of the contract.

18
Q

Which of the following guarantees that judgments rendered in one U.S. state will (subject to only a few exceptions) be recognized and enforced by all other U.S. states?

A The Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

B The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

C The Full Faith and Credit Act of 1971.

D Comity.

A

B

The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires that judgments rendered in one U.S. state be recognized and enforced by all other U.S. states, subject to only a few exceptions. The Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires that all U.S. states be based on a “republican form of government.” Comity is a principle of law that encourages, but does not require, nations to recognize and enforce judgments from other nations.

19
Q

Which law will govern a litigation involving parties and events from multiple states?

A The procedural law of the forum and the substantive law chosen by the forum’s choice of law approach.

B The procedural and substantive law of the forum.

C The procedural and substantive law of the state with the most significant relationship to the litigation.

D The procedural law of the forum and the substantive law of the state with the most significant relationship to the litigation.

A

A

A forum will follow its own procedural law but will apply the substantive law of the state chosen under its choice of law approach. Using the procedural law of the forum and the substantive law of the state with the most significant relationship to the litigation would be the correct answer for those states that apply the Second Restatement (most significant relationship) approach for choice of law, but many states do not employ that particular approach (e.g., a number of states employ the First Restatement (vested rights) approach). Therefore, this cannot be the correct answer for all states.

20
Q

Under the Second Restatement (most significant relationship) approach for choice of law, which of the following specific contacts should NOT be taken into account when determining the state with the most significant relationship to a tort case?

A The state that was the place of injury.

B The state that was the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred.

C The state of the parties’ domicile.

D The state where the suit was filed.

A

D

The state where the suit was filed is not among the specific contacts considered under the Second Restatement approach when determining the state with the most significant contacts to tort litigation. Under §145 of the Second Restatement, the following contacts should be considered in the torts context when choosing the state with the most significant relationship to the litigation: (i) the state that was the place of injury, (ii) the state that was the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred, (iii) the state of the parties’ domicile, and (iv) the state where the relationship (if any) between the parties was centered.

21
Q

Under the Second Restatement (most significant relationship) approach for choice of law, which of the following specific contacts would NOT be taken into account when determining the state with the most significant relationship to a contract case?

A The state where the contract was negotiated and signed.

B The state where the contract was challenged in court.

C The state where the contract was (or was to be) performed.

D The state that was the location of the subject matter of the contract.

A

B

The state where the contract was challenged in court is not among the specific contacts considered under the Second Restatement approach when determining the state with the most significant contacts to contract litigation. Under §188 of the Second Restatement, the following contacts should be considered in the contracts context when choosing the state with the most significant relationship to the litigation: (i) the state where the contract was negotiated and signed, (ii) The state where the contract was (or was to be) performed, (iii) the state of the parties’ domicile, (iv) the state that was the location of the subject matter of the contract, and (v) the domicile, residence, nationality, place of incorporation, and place of business of the parties.

22
Q

Which of the following is entitled to recognition under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution?

A A judgment that a claim is time-barred by the statute of limitations.

B A penal (criminal) judgment.

C A consent judgment.

D A marriage.

A

C

Consent judgments are judgments on the merits and therefore entitled to full faith and credit. Penal judgments are an exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Marriages are not judgments and therefore are not entitled to full faith and credit, and a judgment that a claim is time-barred by the statute of limitations is not on the merits and so is not entitled to full faith and credit.

23
Q

Which of the following is true with respect to the recognition and enforcement of judgments in the United States?

A A state court judgment that satisfies the requirements of the Full Faith and Credit Clause must be recognized and enforced only by state courts located in other states.

B A state court judgment that satisfies the requirements of the Full Faith and Credit Clause must be recognized and enforced only by federal courts located in other states.

C A state court judgment that satisfies the requirements of the Full Faith and Credit Clause must be recognized and enforced by state and federal courts located in other states.

D A state court judgment that satisfies the requirements of the Full Faith and Credit Clause may be recognized and enforced by state and federal courts located in other states.

A

C

The Full Faith and Credit Clause requires states to recognize and enforce other states’ court judgments, assuming they meet the full faith and credit requirements, as a matter of right. An implementing federal statute provides that this clause is extended to the federal courts. Therefore, recognition of judgments is required between state and federal courts and between federal courts.

24
Q

Which of the following is a valid defense to the recognition and enforcement of a judgment under the Full Faith and Credit Clause?

A The judgment was predicated on a mistake of law.

B The judgment was procured through intrinsic fraud.

C The judgment was procured through extrinsic fraud.

D The judgment violates the public policy of the recognizing state.

A

C

If the judgment was obtained through extrinsic fraud, it would not be subject to enforcement in the rendering state and is therefore also not subject to enforcement in the recognizing state. Intrinsic fraud, public policy, and mistake are not valid defenses to full faith and credit.

25
Q

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the recognition and enforcement of judgments under the Full Faith and Credit Clause?

A The judgment must have been based on a proper assertion of jurisdiction.

B The judgment must have been on the merits.

C The judgment must have been final.

D The judgment must have been free of substantial error.

A

D

A state court judgment is entitled to full faith and credit if it is final, on the merits, and based on upon a proper assertion of jurisdiction. There is no requirement that the judgment be free of error.