Conflict of Laws Flashcards
Domicile Generally
The most important way the law connects a particular person with a particular jurisdiction or state. Person can have ONLY ONE domicile
Domicile by choice
Person must (1) abandon previous domicile, (2) establish a physical presence in the chosen domicile, and (3) show an intent to remain for an indefinite time–shown by persons actions and statements as a whole
Domicile by Law
Law establishes domicile for persons who lack capacity for proper intent. Ex: children taken domicile of parents. Ex: Corporations domiciled in state of incorporation, but other facts can prove relevant
Choice of law issue arises when
the law of more than one jurisdiction arguable applies to same set of facts
Forum State
the state in which the lawsuit is brought
Forum Law
Law of the forum state
Vested Rights/Traditional Approach (1st Rest.)
Each state determines the legal effect of all events, but only those events that occur within its territory.
Legal right becomes vested under law of the state where it occurrdd as soon as it occurs. A right vests when the last act takes place that is necessary to give the plaintiff a cause of action.
Government Interest Analysis
- A law applies to a set of facts if its application to those facts would promote the policies and purposes underlying the law
- if application of law to the facts of the case is consistent with the purpose and policy, the state is said to be interested in the case
Types of of Government Interest Conflicts
Presumption that the forum state will apply its own law. Parties may request that another state’s law be applied because other state has greater interest.
(1) False Conflict-Forum has no interest–apply more interest law
(2) True Conflict–review forum policies to determine which law should apply. If true conflict that can’t be resolved, forum wins
(3) Disinterested Forum
When is a state interested in applying conduct regulating laws
when the wrongful conduct occurs within the territory or when a state domiciliary is injured anywhere
when is a state interest in applying loss shifting laws
when doing so would benefit a state domiciliary
Significant Relationship Test (2nd Rest)
Apply the law of that state that has the most significant relationship, consider if application furthers the policies of the states, systemic interests such as predictability and simplicity, and whether justified expectations of the parties will be protected. If unclear which has a more significant interest, apply the law of the forum state.
Depecage
When different states laws apply to different issues in a case. Not allowed under the vested rights approach.
Renvoi
Court applies the law of another state, the ‘whole law,’ including COL rules. Generally rejected because infinite cycle problem. Used in property rights.
Traditional Approach-Torts
The case is governed by the law of the place where the last event necessary to make the actor liable for the tort took place
Government Interest- Torts
The forum state generally looks to its own law, so long as that state has a legitimate interest in applying its own law
-Another states law would be applied if a party requests such an application and the forum court determines that the other states law should apply in accordance with the forum states policies
Most Significant relationship- Torts (2nd restatement)
- Policy principles are applied to determine the applicable substantive law.
- Court considers the place of the injury, the place where he conduct causing the injury occurred, the domicile, residence, etc, and the place where the relationship is centered
- default rule–the place of injury controls unless another state has a more significant relationship
Express Provision–K’s
Express COL provision governes, unless
- it is contrary to public policy
- there is no reasonable basis for the parties choice, or
- true consent was not given because of fraud or mistake
Vested Rights-Ks
the applicable law depends on either where the k was executed or where it was to be performed
Most Significant Relationship- Ks (2nd rest
Policy factors considered along with: location of contracting, negotiation, and performance, place where ks subject matter located, location of parties domiciles etc
PRESUMPTION: if location of negotiation and performance are the same, the law of that state presumptively applies
Types of Property
Movable and Immovable
Immovable Property
Land and Interest in land. Under all three approaches, issues concerning immovable properties are governed by the whole law of the place where property located
INCLUDES: the whole law, rules of the situs (Renvoi generally accepted)
Movable Property
Divided into tangible and intangible
Tangible Movable Property
The UCC allows parties to choose which law governs and fills the gaps if they do not. First and Second Restatements: Apply the law of the state where the property were/was located at the time of the transaction.