Conflict Of Laws Flashcards

1
Q

Family Law—full faith and credit

A

A state must recognize final judgments of other states so long as the judgment is on the merits and the other state had jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Family Law—Recognition of marriage

A

A marriage which is valid under the law of the state where it was contracted will be valid elsewhere unless it violates a strong public policy of the state that has the most significant relationship to the spouses and the marriage (ex: polygamy or incest; not blood test requirements, license requirements, and common law marriage).

Common law marriage is virtually always tested when this principle is tested—if the marriage is recognized by the state where the couple entered into the marriage, it will be recognized by all other states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Family Law—jurisdiction over divorce vs. jurisdiction over spousal support and property division

A

Personal jurisdiction over both spouses is not necessary to render a divorce decree. The state rendering the decree only needs jurisdiction over the plaintiff spouse.

Personal jurisdiction over both spouses is necessary to issue a binding property division or support order.

“Divisible” divorce decree concept.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Family Law—recognition of divorce

A

A divorce decree must be granted full faith and credit by other states if the court rendering the divorce decree had jurisdiction to enter it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Family Law—which state’s law governs premarital agreements?

A

Some states will apply the law of the state where the contract was executed. Other states (probably more numerous) apply the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the parties and transaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Civil Procedure—Klaxon doctrine

A

A federal district court in a diversity case must apply the choice of law approach of the state in which it sits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Civil Procedure—if a case is transferred to a more appropriate forum, which forum’s law applies?

A

The law of the transferor court.

A court may transfer a case to any district court in which it could have been brought if convenience and the interest of justice favor a transfer. When a case is transferred to a more appropriate forum under this rule, then the new (transferee) court must apply the laws that the original (transferor) court would have applied (including their state choice of law rules).

If the case was initially filed in an improper forum and was transferred to a proper forum: transferee court applies its own law because the transferor court would not have the power to hear the case in the first place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Civil Procedure—Statute of limitations

A

Generally, a court will apply its own procedural laws even if the substantive laws of another state are applied to the case. A statute of limitations is generally considered procedural. Generally, a court applies its own statute of limitations UNLESS the claim would be barred by the law of the state with a more significant relationship to the parties.

Exception—borrowing statute: some states have borrowing statutes that indicate the other state’s statute should be used in certain cases.

Exception—characterization: when a SOL is specific to a particular kind of claim and was created by the law that created the cause of action to which it applies, courts will often characterize the SOL as substantive.

Exception—interest analysis: some states will simply use an interest analysis to resolve choice of law issues, including statute of limitations issues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Civil Procedure—choice of law clause in a contract claim:

A

If a contract specifies the state law that it will be governed by, generally that law will apply.

UNLESS: (1) the chosen state has no substantial relationship to the parties or the transaction and there is no other reasonable basis for the parties’ choice; or (2) application of the law of the chosen state would be contrary to a fundamental policy of a state that has a materially greater interest than the chosen state in the determination of the particular issue and which, under a “most significant relationship test” would be the state of the applicable law in the absence of an effective choice of law by the parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Civil Procedure—tort claim

A

A jurisdiction analyzes a specific tort claim under the “most significant relationship” approach. Four factors (I Can’t Dance, Really): (1) place where the Injury occurred; (2) place where the Conduct causing the injury occurred; (3) Domicile, residence, nationality, place of incorporation, and place of business of the parties; and (4) the place where the Relationship, if any, between the parties is centered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Civil Procedure—real property

A

A court generally uses the law of the situs for land (i.e., the law where the real property is located). Occasionally, the state will characterize a dispute over real property as a contract dispute and look at which state has the most significant relationship to the property if it makes more sense in the given case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Decedents’ Estates—validity of a will

A

At common law, the validity of a will was determined under the law of the state where the testator was domiciled at the time of his death. Under the UPC, a will is valid if it complies either with the law of the state in which it was executed or with the law of the place where the testator was domiciled when he signed his will or when he died.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Decedents’ Estates—personal property

A

Postmortem distribution of personal property is governed by the law of the state in which the decedent was domiciled at the time of his death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Decedents’ Estates—real property

A

Postmortem distribution of real property is governed by the law of the situs (i.e., the law of the place where the property is located).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Decedents’ Estates—inheritance

A

Whether a child is entitled to inherit depends on the law of the intestate’s domicile at the time of death. However, this is inapplicable to real property as the law governing real property is the law of the situs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rendering jurisdiction

A

The place where the judgment was originally entered

17
Q

Recognizing jurisdiction

A

Place where recognition is being sought

18
Q

Is the rendering jurisdiction a sister state?

A
  1. Are the requirements of full faith and credit satisfied?

2. Are there any valid defenses?

19
Q

Is the rendering jurisdiction a foreign country?

A

Is the foreign judgment entitled to comity?

20
Q

Requirements of full faith and credit:

A
  1. Jurisdiction—personal and subject matter. Exception: when the issue of jurisdiction has been fully and fairly litigated, then the jurisdictional determination is itself entitled to full faith and credit.
  2. Merits—the judgment entered by the rendering state must have been on the merits (not on the merits if based on time bar, lack of jurisdiction, misjoinder, improper venue, failure to state a claim sometimes) BUT a default judgment IS on the merits.
  3. Finality—judgment by the rendering court must be a final judgment—a judgment on appeal in the rendering jurisdiction is not final.

Note: these three requirements are evaluated with the law of the rendering state.

21
Q

Valid defenses to full faith and credit:

A

Penal judgments are not entitled to full faith and credit. These are judgments that punish an offense against the public (plaintiff in the suit that led to the judgment was the state).

A judgment obtained by extrinsic fraud is not entitled to full faith and credit. Extrinsic fraud: fraud that could not be corrected during the regular course of proceedings leading to the judgment.

22
Q

Attractive but invalid defenses to full faith and credit:

A

Public policy—even though one state disapproves of something, that is not enough to avoid full faith and credit.

Mistakes—even though the rendering state misapplied the law, the judgment is entitled to full faith and credit (rationale: should be appealed in the rendering state).

23
Q

Comity

A

Under the principles of comity, a recognizing court will exercise discretion to decide th whether the foreign judgment should be recognized.

  1. Did the foreign court have jurisdiction?
  2. Were the procedures in the foreign court fair?
24
Q

Choice of law core answer:

A

The governing law is the law selected by the forum court according to its choice of law approach.

Exceptions: diversity cases in federal court—apply choice of law approach of the state in which it sits; transferred diversity cases—apply the choice of law of the transferor court.

25
Q

Structure of a choice of law answer:

A
  1. Describe choice of law: “The issue presented is which state’s law will govern the outcome of this litigation. The governing law will be selected by the forum court using the (fill in applicable choice of law approach).”
  2. Describe choice of law approach: vested rights; interest analysis; most significant relationship.
  3. Apply choice of law approach.
26
Q

Vested rights choice of law approach

A

Under this approach the court will apply the law of the state mandated by the applicable vesting rule. That rule is selected according to the relevant substantive area of law.

Torts: where the injury occurred
Contracts: formation—place of contracting; performance—place of performance

27
Q

Interest analysis choice of law approach

A

Under this approach the court will consider which states have a legitimate interest in the outcome of the litigation. The forum court will apply its own law as long as it has a legitimate interest. If the forum state has no legitimate interest, it will apply the law of another interested state.

28
Q

Most significant relationship choice of law approach

A

Under this approach the court will apply the law of the state which is most significantly related to the outcome of the litigation. To determine this, the court will consider connecting facts and policy principles.

Torts: facts—injury; conduct causing injury; at home; centered relationship
Policy—forum state and other connected states

Property: facts—contracting; negotiations; performance; at home
Policy—forum state; other connected states; expectations of parties.

29
Q

A choice of law provision in a contract will…

A

Be enforced if it is valid and express.

Invalid if: (1) no reasonable relationship to the contract or (2) provision was included without true mutual assent.

30
Q

For movable (personal) property, if the case involves an inter vivos transaction, apply the law of the ___ at ___.

If the case involves a matter relating to inheritance, apply the law of the ___ at ___.

A

Situs; time of transaction

Decedent’s domicile; date of death

31
Q

If a marriage is valid where ____, it will be recognized as valid ____.

A

Performed; everywhere

Exception: when domiciliaries of one state temporarily relocate to another state to perform a marriage that violates a prohibitory rule in their home state, the state of domicile will not recognize the marriage.

Prohibitory rule: expresses strong public policy regarding marriage.

32
Q

The divorce forum will apply ___ laws.

A

It’s own

33
Q

Legitimacy of a child is governed by the law of ___.

A

The mother’s domicile at the time of the child’s birth.

34
Q

The validity of subsequent acts of legitimation are governed by the law of ___.

A

The father’s domicile.

35
Q

Defenses to choice of law

A
  1. Public policy: forum court will not apply a law that is against its own fundamental public policy. Note: does not apply to recognition of judgments!
  2. Procedural rules: regardless of the outcome of the choice of law analysis, the forum court will always apply its own procedural rules.
36
Q

Statutes of limitations have historically been viewed as ___.

A

Procedural

Exceptions:

  • borrowing statutes: direct a court to look at both the forum limitations period and the foreign limitations period and then apply the shorter period.
  • limitations that condition a substantive right: if the normal choice of law analysis leads to the application of a foreign statute that creates a substantive right, then apply the entire statute.
37
Q

Domicile by law

A

An individual who lacks domicile capacity is assigned one by law:

  1. Children: newborns are assigned domicile of their parents; in divorce, children are assigned the domicile of their custodial parent.
  2. Mental incompetents: a person who is mentally incompetent is assigned the domicile of their parents; if an individual becomes incompetent after acquiring a domicile by choice, the individual retains the chosen domicile.