Confessions Flashcards

1
Q

3 Federal Constitutional Challenges to exclude a confession?

1 Additional NY Constitutional Challenge?

A
  • 14th A Due Process Clause
  • 6th A Right to Counsel
  • 5th A Miranda Doctrine
  • NY 6th A Indelible Right to Counsel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the standard for excluding a confession under the Due Process Clause?

A

Involuntariness (meaning police coercion) that overbears the suspect’s will.

NY- has specifically ruled that the length of interrog. & custody are factors to consider in determining voluntariness of confessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Federal 6A Right to Counsel-

  • when does it attach?
  • what does it apply to?
  • is it, or is it not, offense specific?
A
  • attaches when the D is formally charged, NOT upon arrest!
  • applies to all critical stages that take place after the filing of formal charges (arraignment, hearings, interrogation)
  • Offense Specific- applies only to offenses with which a D has been formally charged; provides no protection for uncounseled interrogation for other uncharged criminal activity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

New York’s Indelible Right to Counsel

  • greater or lesser protection than federal 6A?
  • when does it attach?
  • is it, or is it not, offense specific?
A
  • Greater protection
  • ** Attaches: (i) when the D is in custody, the police are engaging in “activity overwhelming to the layperson,” and the D requests counsel (ii) at arraignment; iii) upon the filing of an accusatory instrument; or (iv) when there has been any signif judicial activity **
  • not offense specific– if a D is taken into custody for questioning on a charge AND police know he is repped by counsel on that charge, they may not question him about THAT charge OR ANY OTHER matter w/o his attorney present.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do you waive right to counsel? Indelible right to counsel?

A
  • Knowingly, intelligently, voluntarily
  • If a D is repped by counsel, indelible right in NY must be waived in attorney’s presence UNLESS released and later brought in on unrelated charge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Four Core Miranda Warnings

A

1- right to remain silent
2- anything you say can and will be used against you in a ct of law
3- right to an attorney
4- if you cannot afford one, an attorney will be appointed for you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When are Miranda warnings necessary?

A

CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION
-CUSTODY- a person is in custody for Miranda purposes if the atmosphere is objectively characterized by police domination and coercion such that his or her freedom of action is limited in a “significant way.”

-INTERROGATION- any conduct the police KNEW or SHOULD HAVE KNOWN was likely to elicit an incriminating response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Public Safety Exception to Miranda

A

If a custodial interrogation is prompted by an immediate concern for public safety, Miranda warnings are unnecessary and any incriminating statements are admissible against the suspect.

ex- boston bombin suspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When is a Miranda waiver “knowing and intelligent” and “voluntary”??

A
  • Knowing & Intelligent if the suspect understands (i) the nature of the rights; and (ii) the consequences of abandoning them.
  • voluntary if not the product of police coercion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

NEW YORK Parent/Child Waiver Rule

A

if the police use deception or concealment to keep a parent away from a child being interrogated, the child’s waiver may be deemed invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Burden of Proof for Miranda Waiver

A

Prosecution bears the burden of proving a valid waiver of a suspect’s Miranda rights by a preponderance of the evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Invoking the Right to Remain Silent

A
  • must invoke UNAMBIGUOUSLY
  • police must SCRUPULOUSLY HONOR invocation, meaning they can’t badger and they must wait a significant period of time before reinitiating questioning and must obtain a valid waiver
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

** Invoking the Right to Counsel

A
  • once suspect makes a SUFFICIENTLY CLEAR request for counsel (one that a reasonable officer would understand) all interrogation must cease unless initiated by the suspect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is the 5th Amendment Miranda right to counsel offense specific?

A

NOOOO!!!
Unlike the 6A, the 5A right to counsel is not offense-specific. Therefore, interrogation following a Miranda request for counsel is prohibited as to ALL TOPICS outside the presence of the suspect’s attorney.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When does a Miranda request for counsel expire?

A
  • 14 days after suspect is released from custody

- a waiver obtained after this period is valid, provided it is knowing, intelligent and voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can statements obtained in violation of Miranda ever be used?

A
  • inadmissible in case-in-chief
  • admissible to impeach Ds testimony
  • not admissible to impeach the testimony of a third-party witness
17
Q

Miranda & Physical Fruits?

A

Failure to give a suspect Miranda warnings does NOT require the suppression of the PHYSICAL FRUITS of incriminating statements, provided the statements are voluntary.

18
Q

Post-Miranda statements after an inadmissible non-Mirandized statement?

A

Admissible provided the initial, non-Mirandized statement was not obtained through the use of inherently coercive police tactics, offensive to due process.

19
Q

Must miranda be given before physical tests?

A

Privilege against self-incrimination under miranda bars a state from compelling a person to provide evidence of a testimonial or communicative nature. Evidence is testimonial or communicative when it reveals a person’s subjective knowledge or thought process. Physical performance tests, or photos of tattos, do not do this.