Confessions Flashcards
When Confessions may be Inadmissible
- may be inadmissible if:
- involuntary
- product of delay in bringing arrested D before magistrate
- Miranda violation
- 6th am. right to counsel violation
- product of an unlawful arrest or detention
When a Confession is Involuntary
- involuntary and inadmissible if:
- a result of coercion or threats; or
- on totality of the circumstances, officer’s misconduct overcame D’s will
Effect of D’s Undisclosed Mental Impairment on Confession
- D’s undisclosed mental impairment alone will not create involuntariness.
- for confession to be inadmissible, police need to coerce, not just D acting on his own mental issues
Confessions because of God
- God cannot coerce a confession- e.g. confession admissible if suspect confesses because he claimed God told him to and he has mental impairment.
Factors to Consider for Involuntary Confessions
- deception of the suspect by officers
- delay in presenting the suspect before a magistrate, and
- promise of a specific benefit made by a person in authority
Deceit by Officer standard for involuntary confessions
- Deceit by officer must be over-the-top deceitful. Regular, run-of-the-mill lying does not make confession involuntary
Application of Confession Laws on Exam
- Standard pretty tough, unlikely to be inadmissible. unless something crazy happens.
- when in doubt, likely admissible. and not coerced.
When Miranda Rights Apply
- When suspect is:
- suspect is subject to interrogation, and
suspect is in custody, that is arrested or its
When Miranda Rights Don’t Apply
- Miranda not applicable during a nonarrest Terry traffic stop.
How to Tell if D is in Custody for the Purposes of Miranda
- How to tell if in custody:
- look for things like handcuffs, weapons drawn
- Functional equivalent could be some police officers coming to your house at 4 AM and asking you questions.
Interrogation Defined for the purposes of Miranda
- Any conduct the police knew or should have known was likely to elicit an incriminating response.
- Any action which the officer should reasonably know is likely to result in an incriminating response is the equivalent of interrogation
- e.g. “I know you invoked, but your friends saw you do it,” any blurted statement in response inadmissible.
Miranda Interrogation Rule Exception
- Miranda does not apply to incriminating statements made spontaneously, since they are not the product of interrogation.
Miranda and Undercover Officers
- Undercover officers posing as friends do not violate Miranda.
- Ratioale: Suspect thinks the other person is a friend, must feel as though he’s in custody/coerced/dominated by police.
- BUT, note that they do violate 6th am. right to counsel
Public Safety Exception to Miranda
- If interrogation is prompted by an immediate concern for public safety, Miranda warnings are unnecessary and any incriminating statements are admissible against the suspect.
- e.g. man in custody with empty holster on belt. Cops can ask him where the gun is.
Miranda Requirements
- The same shit you hear on TV all the time
- suspect has right to counsel present during questioning.
- Suspect must be given warnings:
- right to remain silent.
- Anything said may be used against the suspect.
- Right to have an attorney present
- Right to appointed attorney if unable to provide own
How to ensure confession complies with Miranda and is thus Admissible
Admissible if prosecution shows:
- warnings were given, and
- suspect made voluntary and knowing waiver of:
- the right to an attorney, and
- the right to remain silent.
- (suspect often initials/signs paper with rights on them that waives those rights)
Miranda Waiver Requirements
- knowing and intelligent
- voluntary
Definition of Knowing and Intelligent for the Purposes of Miranda
- knowing and intelligent
- suspect must understand:
- the nature of the right, and
- the consequences of abandoning those rights
- suspect must understand:
Definition of Voluntary for the Purposes of Miranda
- Voluntary
- must not be the product of police coercion
How Miranda Waivers are Judged
- Judged under totality of the circumstances test.
- Must be a showing that the detainee received Miranda warnings and then chose to answer questions
Burden of Proof for Miranda Waivers
- Burden of proof is on prosecution by preponderance of the evidence
Personal Nature of Miranda Rights
- Miranda rights are personal
- must be invoked by suspect, not the lawyer
- Even if lawyer wants to be present for the questioning, suspect can still waive rights and confess without attorney.
Subsequent Re-Assertion of Miranda rights after waiver
- If you waive, then re-assert right to counsel, cops must immediately stop questioning until suspect gets counsel.
Effect of D Invoking Miranda 5th Am. Right to Remain Silent
- Once invoked, police must “scrupulously honor” a suspect’s request to remain silent.
- This means, at the very least that the police cannot badger a suspect into talking.
- But, police can wait a respectful period of time and re-approach suspect asking to talk.