Conduct / The Act Flashcards

1
Q

Define Conduct/Act

A

● A Voluntary Human Positive Act or Omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Name 3 Requirements of Conduct/Act?

A

♧ Human Act

♧ Voluntary

♧ Positive and Negative Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain Human Act?

A

♤ An Act caused by a human being

♤ Accepted as Conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can a company “Act” (Still a human Act?)

A

◇ Juristic Person

◇ University, Company, Public School etc.

◇ Act through its Organs (Humans)

◇ Held delictually liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A wild animal attacks a person. Could this action be a delictual act?

A

♡ Accepted as Conduct

♡ Use of an Instrument

♡ Only when Human Act is present

♡ Can be Delictually Liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Voluntariness?

A

☆ Person must have the ability/ sufficient mental ability

to control his muscular movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Does Voluntariness imply that an Act must be Willed or Desired?

A

Voluntariness is NOT

♧ Willed

♧ Desired

♧ Rational

♧ Explicable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does a Minor or Mentally ill person act Voluntarily?

A

♤ YES

♤ Could lack ACCOUNTABILITY - then no FAULT AND doer escapes LIABILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Distinguish between Postive and Negative Act?

A

◇ Commissio (Postive Act)

◇ Active Conduct

◇ To Act

◇ Omissio (Negative Act)

◇ Inactive Conduct

◇ Failure to Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Name the Defence that a person can raise against the element of Conduct?

A

♡ Automatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define Automatism

A

◇ The Act of the wrongdoer must be Voluntary to cause delictual liability
Person did not have mental capacity to control muscular movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who will raise the Defence of Automatism?

A

☆ Defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Complete: Automatism must be proved on a _______________ (burden of proof?)

A

■ Balance of Probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the defence of Automatism entail?

A

☆Defendant –> Acted MECHANICALLY (Automatic)

☆ No control over bodily MOVEMENT

☆ Acted INVOLUNTARY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give examples of conditions where a Defence of Automatism could potentially succeed?

A

◇ Absolute Compulsion

◇ Fainting Fit

◇ Sleep

◇ Epileptic Fit

◇ Unconsciousness

◇ Hypnosis

◇ Heart Attack

◇ Serious Intoxication

◇ Blackout

◇ Reflex Movement

◇ Mental Diseases

◇ Strong Emotional Pressures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Molefe V Mohaeng

A

■ Footnote 18

■ A Driver suffered a Blackout in a motor vehicle accident

■ Footnote 27

■ The driver (Defendant) pleaded that he was overcome by a sudden unforeseen and uncontrollable black out

■ Judgement

■Defence should be approached with caution

■ Plaintiff in this case did not succeed in discharging this onus

17
Q

Who bears the Onus of proving that the other party acted Voluntary? (Molefe V Mohaeng)

A

♧ Plaintiff - must prove that Defendant acted VOLUNTARY and Negligent

18
Q

Does Amnesia constitute as Automatism?

A

♤ Footnote 24

♤ R V Du Plessis

♤ Not Automatism

♤ Acted Voluntary

♤ At that relevant time Defendant had control over his Muscular Movement
Can have evidentiary value.

19
Q

If you kill someone in your sleep are you guilty? What about sleepwalking or dreaming?

A

☆ Footnote 22

☆ S V Johnson (dreaming) cannot be held liable

☆ S V Ncube (Sleepwalking) Does not act Voluntary

20
Q

Explain Actio Libera Causa and Negligence by means of Automatism as a Defence?

A

♧ Automatism is not successful as a Defence

♧ Defendant acts intentionally cause harm

♧ Acts Involuntarily and Negligent to his automatic conduct

♧ Reasonably foreseeing possible harm

♧ Drinking alcohol knowing that they will later drive a motor vehicle

21
Q

Case Law examples of Automatism being Successful or not?

☆ Case law : Facts
Xolani suffers an Epileptic fit while driving his motor car and in the process collided with a pedestrian and another Vehicle

A

♡ Footnote 25

On the same facts

♡ R v Victor —> ( Defence of Automatism rejected)

♡ R v Schoonwinkel —> ( Defence of Automatism was upheld)

22
Q

Case Law examples of Automatism being Successful or not?

◇ Case Law : R v Mkize
Facts
Xolani during an Epileptic Fit, Stabbed and killed his sister

A

♡Footnote 25

♡ Court held

Stabbing of his sister was part of his muscular activity by the accused during his Unconsciousness

♡Accused did not act Voluntary

23
Q

Discuss Commission

A

♧ Commissio

♧ Positive Act

♧ To Act

♧ Less Restricted

♧ More easily to be found liable

Example: Driving through a red light and colliding with a vehicle. The positive act of driving.

24
Q

Discuss Omission

A

○Omissio

○ Negative Act

○ Failure to Act

○ Liability is restricted

○ Legal Duty

○ Failure to take possible steps to prevent harm

○ Example: Police failing to prevent a dangerous criminal from escaping and he subsequently rapes a woman