Concurrent Estates Flashcards

1
Q

What is the default concurrent estate in MO?

A

tenancy in common, unless otherwise expressly declared in a grant to be a joint tenancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are 3 indicators of tenancy in common?

A
  1. “conveyed to A &B”
  2. separate but undivided interest in property
  3. no survivorship - if one party dies, their interest goes to their estate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 4 things required for joint tenancy?

A
  1. unity of time
  2. unity of title
  3. unity of interest
  4. unity of possession
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is unity of time under joint tenancy?

A

each of the joint interests must vest at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is unity of title under joint tenancy?

A

one document, one deed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is unity of interest under joint tenancy?

A

all parties must have equal % interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is unity of possession under joint tenancy?

A

each tenant needs to have the right to possess the same thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When does survivorship apply under joint tenancy?

A

if one party dies, their interest goes to the other parties equally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is unilaterally severable under joint tenancy?

A

one party can convey their % to themselves (i.e. three parties own something in join tenancy and one party conveys their interest to themselves - that party is now a tenant in common with the other two - and the other two own their % still as joint tenants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the requirements of tenancy by entirety (married people)?

A

Needs joint tenancy requirements plus marriage

not unilaterally severable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can tenancy in entirely be terminated?

A

yes, both parties must convey property to themselves at the same time to get the 4 unities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is partition in kind?

A

to split up land (usually the default)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is partition in sale?

A

a court forced sale - where the burden is upon the party seeking sale to prove partition is impractical/inequitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are 2 reasons a partition in sale (a court forced sale) should be ordered?

A
  1. physical attributes of the land are such that a partition is impractical or inequitable.
  2. interests of the owner would be better promoted by partitions of sale
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is ouster?

A

the idea of let me in or get out - triggers liability for the whole rent to the other co-tenant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the two requirements of ouster?

A
  1. refusal to let co-tenant in

2. but both allowed to use the whole thing

17
Q

Riddle v. Harmon

A

CONCURRENT ESTATES - CONVEYANCES

A joint tenant may terminate a joint tenancy by conveying his or her interest in the property, with or without the knowledge of the other tenant(s), to another party.

18
Q

Does conveying a joint tenancy to oneself as a tenant in common effectively shatter a joint tenancy?

A

Yes, because there is no reason to maintain the outmoded requirement of involving a third party. It is simpler and more efficient to allow persons to shatter joint tenancies directly rather than set up legal fictions to accomplish the same purpose (straw man).

19
Q

What is the common law notion of a straw man in the destruction of joint tenancies?

A

Common law: destruction of a joint tenancy required a straw man – a joint tenant had to convey his property interest to a third party (thereby destroying the joint tenancy) then the third party would convey the property interest back to the original tenant. And the return of the property would not restore the joint tenancy.

20
Q

Delfino v. Vealencis

A

When dividing jointly held property, a partition in kind is favored over a partition by sale.

21
Q

Is a partition in kind preferable to a partition by sale where one holder by tenancy in common?

A

Yes, a partition of sale should be ordered only where a partition in kind is impracticable or inequitable, and when the interest of the parties would be better suited by sale.

22
Q

What is the default concurrent estate for common law?

A

Joint tenancy

23
Q

What tenancies have a right to survivorship?

A

Joint tenancy and tenancy by entirety have right of survivorship – tenancy in common does not

24
Q

Spiller v. Mackereth

If one co-tenant asserts ownership of the property in such a manner as to deprive his co-tenant of his rights to the property, then an ouster has occurred and the ousted co-tenant is entitled to compensation for his interests.

A

A co-tenant in common, having an undivided right to the entire property, does not owe rent to his co-tenant unless he agrees to, or unless he has effected the ouster of his co-tenant.

25
Q

Does refusing a co-tenants demand for rent or to vacate half of a property constitute an ouster?

A

No, tenants in common each own an undivided interest in the whole property, so each has the right to enjoy using the full property without paying rent.

However, one co-tenant must honor a demand from the other co-tenant who wishes to use the property as well.

26
Q

When does ouster occur?

A

If one co-tenant asserts ownership of the property in such a manner as to deprive his co-tenant of his rights to the property, then an ouster has occurred and the ousted co-tenant is entitled to compensation for his interests.

27
Q

Swartzbaugh v. Sampson

A

A joint tenant may, without the consent of his co-tenant, convey or burden his share of the property only to the extent of his interest in the property.