Conclusion

Question 1

Schleirmacher

Answer 1

Schleirmacher says that all societies throughout history have a God independently and everyone is born with God consciousness.

Question 2

Feurbach opposing Schleirmacher

Answer 2

Feurbach opposes Schleirmacher and says that when someone is in need of something he prays to a God that can supply that need to him, for example if someone is sad they will pray to the God of happiness.

Question 3

Swinburne cumulative argument

Answer 3

Swinburne said that just like small bits of evidence add up in a court case to prove the offender, there are enough small bits of evidence to suggest the existence of a super-intelligent being

Question 4

Flew’s argument opposing Swinburne’s argument

Answer 4

Against Swinburne, Flew suggest that like 10 leaky buckets will not help you transport water more than 1, a lot of unsound evidence does not create sound evidence

Question 5

What is the stronger side of the debate

Answer 5

In my opinion belief in God is absolutely reasonable because wether he really does exist or not, there is enough evidence powerful from every single different argument to our weigh the contrary and therefore give a suitable reason to believe in God