Concepts of Ministerial responsibility Flashcards
What is ministerial responsibility ?
- Ministers are accountable for their action as an individual member of government and as a head of their department
What are ministers now more likely to resign for ?
- Personal misconduct eg Priti Patel (2018 involved in unauthorised meetings with the government of Israel) and Mandelson (2001 over accusations of using his position to influence a passport application)
Ministers that have resigned for their own failures
- Due to government functions that have been delegated to executive agencies
- Eg Michael Howards (resigned following the loss of the 2005 election) + McLoughlin (2018 due to a disappointing performance in the 2017 election)
- Priti Patel 2018 over unofficial meetings with Israel
Case study of Charles Clarke
- 2006
- Labour home secretary
- Emerged 1000 foreign citizens who were released from prison were unaccounted for
- “department had taken it’s eye off the ball” but refused to resign
- 10 days after he lost his job in a reshuffle after media interest continued
David Laws
- 2010
- Resigned due to the expenses scandal due to the disclosure of parliamentary expenses (individual)
Collective ministerial responsibility
- Cabinet members must support the decisions of cabinet publicly or resign
Individual ministerial responsibility
- Ministers are accountable for the actions of their department and their own
Liam Fox
- 2011
- Resigned over allegations he gave a close friend and lobbyist inappropriate access to the ministry of defence and allowed him to join official trips
- Individual ministerial responsibility
Chris Huhne
- 2012
- Charged with perverting the course of justice over a 2003 speeding case in which at the time his wife claimed she was driving the car to avoid him being banned from driving
- Individual ministerial responsibility
Andrew Mitchell
- 2012
- Resigned from Chief whip when there was an alleged altercation with a police officer referred to as plebgate
- Individual ministerial responsibility
What is the expected consequence of a minister misleading Parliament? Who is the ‘ultimate judge’ of ministerial standards and behaviour?
- If a minister has misled Parliament they are expected to reign from their position, although this is only a convention
- The PM is the ultimate judge of standards and behaviour, with this linking to the prerogative power of appointing/dismissing ministers.
How can it be argued that ministerial responsibility is in decline ?
- 2022 Partygate scandal MPs are yet to resign following allegations of lockdown breaches
What impacts the fate of ministers when their conduct/departmental actions are under scrutiny? (3)
- the severity of the situation
- level of parliamentary/media criticism
- the attitude of the PM.
How have ministers recently argued that they are not themselves responsible for some departmental failures?
- Given that Government actions are now being delegated to executive agencies, the Secretary of State can argue that the error was committed by the head of the executive agency
- they therefore should resign rather than the minister.
What recent example is there of the head of an Executive Agency being forced to resign rather than a minister?
- In 2020, the head of OFQUAL, Sally Collier, was forced to resign over the exams fiasco rather than Secretary of State for Education, Gavin Williamson.