Concepts Journal Club 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Cross-over

A

First one group receives A, later followed by B, while the other group first receives B, later followed by A. Benefit is that they can become their own control group, however the first treatment can effect the second treatment (carry-over effect).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Counterbalancing

A

Neutralize or cancel by exerting an opposite influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Enforcing allocation concealment

A

A technique used to prevent selection bias in RCT’s by concealing the allocation sequence from those assigning participants to the intervention groups, until the moment of assignment. Thus it prevents researchers from influencing which participants are assigned to the intervention or control group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Placebo

A

A substance that has no therapeutic effect, used as a control in testing new drugs. Sometimes no placebo when there should be one, because it is not ethical to give people not a medicine while they actually need it to get better.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outcome measure(s)

A

Determination and evaluation of the results of an activity, plan, process, or program and their comparison with the intended or projected results. You have the primary outcome (where you are looking for) and secondary outcome (align with any secondary study aim or objective).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Blinding / Masking

A

When information about the test is masked (kept) from the participant/researchers, to reduce or eliminate bias. Double blind when both the researchers and participants do not know.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Generalisability

A

The extent to which the findings of a study can be applied to other situations. It can be divided into population generalisability, environmental generalisability and temporal generalisability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Error (random, systematic), Noise (origins of error, researcher)

A

Systematic error is a consistent, repeatable error associated with faulty equipment, or a flawed experiment design, and it will cause bias. Random error has no pattern, they are unpredictable and unavoidable. Noisy data is data that is corrupted, or distorted, or has a low Signal-to-Noise Ratio.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Confounding

A

The effects of the exposure under study on a given outcome are mixed in with the effects of an additional factor (or set of factors) resulting in a distortion of the true relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

External validity

A

The extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and to other people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Internal validity

A

The extent to which a causal conclusion based on a study is justified, which is determined by the degree to which a study minimizes systematic error.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Test validity

A

The extent to which a test measures what it is supposed to measure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Experimental validity

A

Refers to the manner in which variables influence both the results of the research and the generalizability to the population at large.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Face validity

A

The extent to which a test is subjectively viewed as covering the concept it claims to measure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Content validity

A

Refers to the extent to which a measure represents all facets of a given construct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Criterion validity

A

The extent to which a measure is related to an outcome. So do the results accurately measure the concrete outcome they are designed to measure?

17
Q

Instrument reliability

A

Way of ensuring that any instrument used for measuring experimental variables gives the same results every time.

18
Q

Inter-rater reliability

A

Degree of agreement among raters. It gives a score of how much homogeneity there is in the ratings given by judges, and it is one of the aspects of test validity.

19
Q

Intra-rater reliability

A

Degree of agreement among repeated administrations of a diagnostic test performed by a single rater.

20
Q

(Pre-)stratification

A

The partitioning of subjects and results by a factor other than the treatment given (e.g. by gender). Stratification can be used to control for confounding variables.

21
Q

Effect modifier (homogeneity in prognostic factors)

A

A factor that modifies the effect of a putative causal factor under study, e.g. age is an effect modifier for many conditions.

22
Q

Continuous variable

A

A variable that has an infinite number of possible values.

23
Q

Discrete variable

A

A variable that can only take on a certain number of values (it represents counts).

24
Q

Interval variable

A

The intervals between the values of the interval variable are equally spaced.

25
Q

Ratio variable

A

Has all the properties of an interval variable, and also has a clear definition of 0.0. When the variable equals 0.0, there is none of that variable.

26
Q

Categorical variable

A

A variable that has two or more categories, but there is no intrinsic ordering to the categories.

27
Q

Control variable

A

Anything that is held constant or limited in a research study. It is a variable that is controlled because it could influence the outcomes.

28
Q

Moderating variable

A

Moderators can be categorical variables or quantitative variables. They influence the relationship between a dependent and an independent variable.

29
Q

Intermediate variable

A

Variable that occurs in a causal pathway from a causal (independent) variable to an outcome (dependent) variable. It causes variation in the outcome variable and itself is caused to vary by the original causal variable.