Concepts Flashcards

1
Q

Test of sphericity

A

when conducting ANOVAs with repeated measures (within subject factors), your factors become vulnerable to violating the assumption of sphericity. this assumption assumes a condition where the variances of the differences between all combinations of related groups are not equal. this assumption is violated when these variances become unequal leading to an increased risk of type 1 error (ADD EXAMPLE HERE). to correct this , this test estimates the degree to which sphericity has been violated allowing one to apply a correction factor to the degrees of freedom of the f distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

simple regression

A

simple regression can be used to model the relationship between two continuous (or ordinal) variables. this can help predict the value of an output variable/response based on the value of the input/predictor variable. both variables should be quantitative with one being dependent and one being independent. For example, y=a+bx, used to make prediction with x value based on an unknown y value/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

methods section

A

in the methods section of a research report, a researcher will describe the steps they included to conduct their experiment. this includes key information such as who the participants are (including age, sex and how they were sampled). this also includes describing which measures were used to collect data e.g. observation, design of task and resources used. a methods section should contain enough detail that somebody could use it to replicate the experiment although it usually is confined to a word limit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

discourse analysis

A

discourse analysis describes a set of methods used for studying the contents of people’s speech and interaction in conversations. this method could be used, for example, to determine if younger people use more filler words in their speech than older people. or how tone varies with age. some issue with this method is that it can be time consuming and not all information can be analyzed. it can also be directional leading to interpretational data rather than testing the hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

floor effects

A

the situation in which a large proportion of participants perform very poorly on a task or other evaluative measure, thus skewing the distribution of scores and making it impossible to differentiate among the many individuals at that low level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

independent samples t test

A

an independent samples t test is used when two independent groups of participants are tested to examine the effects of a single IV. For example, we might test the effects of alcohol intake on reaction time by administering two different levels of alcohol to two different groups (low alcoholic and high alcohol) and collecting reaction time data. the results of the analysis would tell you if the two level of the IV had a significant effect (whether alcohol levels increased or decreased reaction time significantly)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

post hoc tests

A

a significant f value tells us that there is a difference between means somewhere but not where the difference lies, or which groups/levels differ from each other. Post-hoc tests are after the fact comparisons and thus should be corrected to avoid inflating alpha. the test will give a p-value for the difference which can then be interpreted. For example, we might test the effects alcohol intake on reaction time by administering three levels of alcohol (none, low, high). a significant main effect would indicate that there is a difference between the three means, and the results of the post-hoc test would tell you which means were significantly different. For example, only high alcohol might differ from both low and none but low and none do not differ from each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

one way analysis of variance

A

a one way ANOVA is used when one independent variable is manipulated with 3 or more levels. It can be between subjects (different participants in each group) or repeated measures (with the same participants measured at three time e.g. before, during and after a treatment) The results of the analysis tell you if the IV had a significant main effect (for example whether responses differed over time of treatment) The ANOVA separates out the variance in data into that explained by the IV and the unexplained or error variance. The F value is simply the ratio of these two things: explained v unexplained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

informed consent

A

informed consent implies that participants should know all relevant information about an experiment before agreeing to take part. the BPS guidelines argue that informed consent is a crucial aspect of ethical experimental design. However, they also acknowledge that mild deception is sometimes necessary to permit investigation of certain kinds of psychological phenomena. In these cases, participants should be fully debriefed at the end of the study. Further, deception is not considered appropriate if participant are likely to object to the study once they are made aware of its true purpose. Informed consent does not mean telling participants absolutely everything about a study in advance, but it does imply that nothing that might influence decisions to participate should be withheld from them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

discussion section

A

the function of a discussion section is to interpret results in relation to the experimental hypothesis and to discuss what the findings mean. a discussion section should start with a short summary of the study results and get broader throughout ending with a section on the broad implications of these results for the field. the discussion should talk about the results in the context of literature, what new information or interpretation do the results provide. It should also discuss the possible limitations of your study, but should comment on how they might have influenced your results and what you should do about it next time. The discussion can also propose future studies that would answer questions arising from results. Finally, it should end with a summary of the main conclusions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Grounded theory

A

Grounded theory facilitates discovery and helps develop new ideas by approaching phenomena afresh. It involves intensive examination and re-examination of cases and extraction of structure. Provisional models from analysis are reapplied to existing and new data, therefore it is considered a self-correcting method. provisional conclusions are communicated to participants who comment on their plausibility thus providing respondent validation. Data is first collected from theoretically interesting cases, before it is coded, the idea of coding is to constantly compare similarities and differences between identified concepts and themes. The core analysis occurs using memo, writing, definitions and integrating categories. These are then applied to data collection or coding and the process continues. The outcomes of grounded theory are key concepts, definitions, memos and relationships/models.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cluster analysis

A

cluster analysis is a method used for finding data structure, it looks for categories withing data. you would use cluster analysis to classify participants or objects into categories based on similarity. For example, if you were interested in confidence you might want to group participants into a small number of categories according to their self-ratings and how other people rate them to get accurate confidence categories. The cluster analysis will enable the researcher to create subgroups of participants. These subgroups could then be used to look at the link between confidence and sport performance in more detail.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moderated effects

A

A moderator is a variable that modifies (moderates) the relationship between a predictor and an outcome. Moderated effects therefore implies that predictor’s effect on the outcome depends on the value of another predictor (moderator). Assessing moderation helps to answer “when” questions. For example, a researcher may want to know if the relationship between stress on well-being differs according to level of social-support. If there is a moderated effect, it tells the researcher that the relationship does differ depending on level of social support. For example, while there is a positive relationship between stress and well-being when social support is low, there is no relationship between stress and well-being when social support is high.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

spurious effect

A

spurious effects are where there is a significant relationship between two variables that is explained by a third unmeasured variable that is related to both of the other measured variables. This means that the two measured variables are not actually related to each other. For example a researcher may find a relationship between sunburn and drowning, which are actually not related but both are related to temperature. Spurious effects can be tested for using hierarchal multiple regression, if the significant relationship becomes ns once the third variable is entered into the regression equation, then the original relationship was spurious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

event-contingent recording

A

event contingent recording is a time-sampling method. this method measures variables on many more occasions, usually separated by relatively short intervals, allowing a closer focus on how responses unfold over time. Participants provide data whenever a pre-specified event occurs, permitting researches to focus investigation on particular situations (but not to sample a wide variety of experiences). Anticipation of events leads to the problem of reactivity, where anticipation becomes a significant event in its own right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

simultaneous entry multiple regression

A

simultaneous entry multiple regression predicts values of one outcome variable (or dependent variable) on the basis of the values of more than one predictor variables (or independent variables). It includes all predictors in a singe regression equation. This analysis gives the independent effect predictors (e.g. does self-esteem influence happiness when the effects of self-concept and depression are partialled out?). This analysis might be used when a researcher wants to test if a previously determined set of relationships exists in their data, or to test the relative importance of predictors for a specific outcome.

17
Q

hierarchical multiple regression

A

predicts value of one outcome variable (or dependent variable) on the basis of the values of more than one predictor variables (or independent variables). Entering predictors hierarchally enables the researcher to control for variables in a theoretically meaningful order. For example, a researcher may decide to enter personality variables before state variables(because states cannot influence personality, but personality can influence states). The results will tell you which predictors are significant after controlling for previous predictors, as results will tell you which predictors are significant after controlling for previous predictors, as coefficients for predictors entered later reflect their influence after controlling for variables entered earlier. Hierarchal regression can also test whether a predictors effect outcome variable is spurious (whether it depends on a third variable that predicts both the original predictor and outcome.

18
Q

two way between subjects ANOVA (two levels for each factor)

A

used when two independent variables are manipulated and when each participant is allocated to only one of the possible conditions arising from their combination. For example, we might test the effects of gender and alcohol intake on reaction time by administering two levels of alcohol to different men and women. The results of the analysis would tell you if either of the two IVs had a significant main effect (whether men had significantly lower or higher RT than women, and whether higher alcohol levels increased or decreased RT significantly) as well as whether the effects of the IVs interacted (whether alcohol level has different effects on RT for men and women).

19
Q

correlation v causation

A
20
Q

Abstract

A

Purpose of an abstract is to give an overview of the background, motivation, method, results and discussion points of a study. This comes as the beginning of a researcher paper and is meant to be a summary in a relatively short amount of words (APA recommends 150 maximum) to give the reader an idea whether the paper will be of interest to them. A good abstract is clear, simple and accessible to a broad audience despite communicating complex scientific ideas. First it should explain the research question addressed and the hypothesis tested then briefly outline the methods used and the key variables and then present main findings without using statistical data. Finally, it should concisely explain the implications of key findings within the broader context of research in the same area. Abstracts are a vital tool in communicating research and there are many searchable databases (e.g. PubMed) of abstracts that allow academics and students to seek our relevant studies for inclusion in review articles or to guide future research.

21
Q

use of deception in researching human participants

A
22
Q

partial correlation

A

partial correlation is the correlation of one variable with another, while controlling for a third variable. For example, revision time and anxiety are likely to correlate with exam performance, but it is interesting to know how each of the two predictors correlates with exam performance independently. Partial correlation would account for the degree to which the two predictors correlate with each other, so these effects can be “partialled out” in determining the unique contribution of each predictor to the outcome measure.

23
Q

paired samples t test

A

a paired samples t test is used when two samples of data are taken, where the data can be matched together in some way. For example, data taken from the same participant before and after an intervention, or data taken from each of identical twins. The test calculates the difference (dbar) between each data pair, and divides this by the standard error of the difference. A significant result indicates that the difference between the paired observations is greater or less than zero. to use this test, the data must be continuous and the difference values must be normally distributed (even if the raw data are not). If data do not conform to these assumptions, then a non-parametric test (e.g. Wilcoxon’s test for matched pairs) may be more appropriate.

24
Q

repeated measures three way ANOVA

A
25
Q

experimenter effects

A

participants are typically motivated to provide experimenters with good results. if experimenters have direct contact with participants and know which experimental condition they have been allocated to, they may inadvertently affect participants’ reactions during the procedure (e.g. subtle nonverbal signals), usually so that it matches the original hypothesis more closely. The best way of avoiding this is to minimize contact between experimenter and participant and/or to implement double blind procedures (where neither experimenter nor participant knows which condition the participant is in). In some circumstances however, participants may resist the experimenters attempt to influence their behavior, yielding the converse of the usual experimenter effect, usually referred to as a reactance effect.

26
Q

demand characteristics

A

expectations about reactions to manipulations may also be transmitted in standardized instructions or procedures. For example, in many within-subject designs, participants are likely to guess that their behavior is expected to differ across conditions, and obvious differences between procedures in different conditions can carry cues about the nature of the predicted effect. such procedural cues that give participants clues about the hypothesis are known as ‘demand characteristics’. They can be removed in between-subjects designs or designs in which the crucial manipulation is disguised in some way.

27
Q

placebo effects

A

in studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions for improving performance or alleviating symptoms, participants’ feelings that something useful is being done to them can produce improvement regardless of the genuine effectiveness of the intervention’s ingredients. In some ways, these placebo effects may be attributable to experimenter effects or demand characteristics as above. However, in this context, they lead to an additional concern: the need to establish not only that the intervention improves performance compared to a control group (see below) but also whether this improvement reflects active ingredients of the intervention itself rather than merely participant perceptions that it will be helpful. Thus, studies of the effectiveness of psychotherapies routinely use control groups who receive interventions that will be perceived by participants as useful but lack the specific ingredient of the treatment group.

28
Q

right to withdraw

A

investigators should inform participants that they can withdraw from the research at any time, even after payment (or other incentives) have been made. Although this may be difficult in certain situations, the investigator must ensure that participants (including children) know they can withdraw. When testing children, avoidance of the testing situation may be taken as evidence of failure to consent to the procedure and should be acknowledged. participants also have the right to withdraw and to have their data removed/destroyed even after they have participated if e.g. during debriefing they no longer wish to be a part of the study.

29
Q

confedentiality

A

guaranteeing confidentiality to the participants of an experiment protects both the participant and the experimenter. The participant should feel free to give their responses without anyone being able to identify and potentially persecute them for their answers. In turn, the experimenter can be confident that data collected are more likely to reflect the true views of the participant. participants should be informed of their confidentiality at the start of the experiment.

30
Q

effect size

A

an effect size is a measure of the magnitude if a significant effect that is independent of the sample size or the units of measurement. Examples would be d in t tests and eta squared in ANOVA. knowing the effect size makes it possible to compare two experiments run at different times by different people, for example they are required when one performs a meta-analysis of several studies to determine the reliability and magnitude of an effect.