con law review Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

preemption

A

-comes from supremacy clause of constitution (“constitution, federal laws and treaties are the supreme law of the land”)
- if federal and state laws conflict (i.e. impossible to comply with both), the federal law prevails
- if state law impedes achievement of federal objective, it is invalid even if goal is to promote valid state goals
- if Congress demonstrated a clear intent to preempt state law by occupying an entire field, federal law preempts (example: comprehensive regulations or a federal agency oversees an area)

Court presumes not preempted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

express preemption

A

Congress explicitly states federal law is exclusive in an area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

dormant commerce clause

A

state law is invalid if it discriminates against interstate commerce or unduly burdens interstate commerce

applies to both corporation and natural persons

discriminatory law may be valid if it furthers a noneconomic, important state interest and there are no reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives

if undue burden, may be valid if the burden is outweighed by a legitimate local interest. whether less restrictive alternatives are available is a factor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

privileges and immunities clause of article iv

A

No state may deprive other citizens of other states the privileges and immunities it gives its own citizens, unless the state has a substantial justification and there are no less restrictive alternatives

  • applies only to natural persons and citizens- aliens and corporations are not considered citizens of a state
  • only protects commercial activities important to earning a living and fundamental rights- civil liberties
    *state must show important state interest and no less restrictive alternatives
  • important state interest means the out of state residents must cause a particular problem or be part of the problem and the legislation must be tailored to address it

note- recreational activities not protected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

discriminatory laws may be challenged under

A
  1. dormant commerce clause- if burdens interstate commerce
  2. privileges and immunities Article IV: if it discriminates against out of staters in regard to civil liberties or important economic activities
  3. equal protection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

does the market participant exception apply to Article IV privileges and immunities?

A

No, it only applies to Dormant Commerce Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

privileges or immunities clause- fed gov

A

states may not deny citizens the privileges or immunities of national citizenship- ex: right to travel and right to vote for federal officials

Does not include rights listed bill of rights, for example right to have guns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

exceptions to dormant commerce clause

A

market participant exception- the state can prefer its own citizens when it buys or sells products or hires labor

Law favors government actor performing traditionally govt function (ex- all waste must be processed by state government facility, or exempting in state city and state bonds from tax because issuing bonds to pay for public projects is a traditional govt function)

Congress authorizes the state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

if the law burdens interstate commerce but is not discriminatory, how can it be challenged?

A

dormant commerce clause only.

Article IV only applies if discriminates against out of staters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

full faith and credit

A

courts must give full faith and credit to judgments of courts in another state so long as the court that rendered the judgment had jurisdiction, judgment on the merits, judgment is final.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

requirements for case alleging violation of individual liberties

A

state action
restrict fundamental right and/or suspect class
fail to meet level of scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

examples of entanglement giving rise to state action

A
  • private entity regulating interscholastic sports within a state
  • state gives books to school racially discriminating
  • court enforcing a racially restrictive covenant
  • government leases premises to restaurant intentionally discriminating b/c state is getting a benefit (but NOT if it gives a liquor license to a private club that discriminates)

giving a business a license or giving a monopoly to or heavily regulating utilities does not amount to entanglement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

private conduct may have to comply with Constitution if

A
  1. Congress passes law under 13th Amendment (which prohibits slavery)
  2. Congress passes law under 14th Amendment to enforce rights and guarantees provided by the 14th Amendment (prevent or remedy court-recognized violations)
  3. Congress passes law under commerce power (in activities that might have a substantial effect on interstate commerce)

to prohibit discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

due process- defining liberty and property

A

liberty: includes right to contract, engage in gainful employment. a deprivation occurs if the person loses significant freedom of action or is denied a freedom provided by the Constitution or statute

property: legitimate claim or entitlement to a benefit under state or federal law.
- must be a reasonable expectation of continued receipt of the benefit (ex: govt employee has contract for 1 year, has reas. expectation that he will have the job for 1 year)
- at will employment does not count

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

in intermediate scrutiny, who has the burden?

A

the government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

in rational basis scrutiny, who has the burden?

A

challenger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

in strict scrutiny, who has the burden?

A

the government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

the least restrictive alternative analysis is conducted in what level of scrutiny?

A

strict scrutiny only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

procedural due process- clause and required process test

A

No person shall be deprived of life liberty or property without due process of law

  • importance of the interest to the individual
  • value of specific procedural safeguards to the interest (is there a risk of error from current procedures or is there a benefit of changing them or adding more protections?)
  • government interest in fiscal and administrative efficiency

always: notice, opportunity to be heard, unbiased decisionmaker

often fair procedure means a hearing BEFORE the liberty/property is taken, unless doing so is too burdensome to the govt. in many cases notice and chance to respond suffices (school children and prisoners have lower needs; public employees facing termination may not be feasibly able to have a pre-term hearing).

welfare benefits, driver licenses, or garnishing wages or property in a lawsuit by a creditor require an advance hearing before deprivation.

disability benefits and public employment require post-deprivation hearings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

due process- punitive damages

A

jury instructions and judicial review to ensure that award is reasonable. grossly excessive awards violate due process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

due process- institutionalization

A

prior notice and prior evidentiary hearing (adults)

prior screening by neutral factfinder (child)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

due process- seizure of assets

A

generally- notice and hearing

exigent circumstances- attachment, notice and hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Takings clause: government may take property for public use if it provides just compensation

government take private property?
if yes- for public use?
just compensation paid?

A

taking: confiscation, physical occupation, or leaving no economically viable use of land

public use: rationally related to legitimate public purpose (health, welfare, safety, economic, aesthetic reasons)

just compensation: measured by loss to owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

is a temporary denial of use of property a violation of the takings clause?

A

No, not usually. In determining whether govt must pay just compensation, courts look at:
good faith, reasonable expectation of owners, length of delay, impact on property value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

substantive due process v. equal protection

A

if limits liberty of all persons, due process. if it takes away from only some people, EP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

substantive due process level of scrutiny for fundamental rights

A

strict scrutiny

ex: right to privacy, right to travel, right to bear arms, right to vote
NOT education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

rights under the privacy umbrella

A
  1. right to marry- interference requires strict scrutiny
  2. right to procreate- sterilizing someone against their will, must have strict scrutiny
  3. right to custody- compelling reason to deny, such as neglect. note: irrebuttable presumption that woman’s husband is the father of her child is ok
  4. right to use contraceptives (compelling interest of supporting children)
  5. right to abortion- no longer privacy right and states may regulate
  6. right to read obscene material in one’s home
  7. right to keep extended family together- zoning regulation can’t prevent family members from living together
  8. right to refuse medical treatment (but no right to physician assisted death)
  9. right to engage in private, consensual sexual activity (includes homosexual)
  10. parental rights- includes custody and management/care of kid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

right to travel subs. due process

A

laws preventing people from moving into a state must meet strict scrutiny.
durational residency requirements before can receive benefit- strict scrutiny
restrictions on foreign travel- rational basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

right to vote subs. due process

A
  • residency requirements- meet strict scrutiny b/c compelling interest in ensuring only bona fide residents vote (30 days valid, 1 year invalid)
  • requiring property ownership usually invalid
  • poll tax invalid

NONRESIDENTS- can be forbidden voting rights if rational basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

equal protection

A

Fourteenth Amendment for states
Fifth Amendment- Due Process Clause for feds

Where a law treats a person or class of persons differently from others, it is an equal protection question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

gender discrimination

A

quasi suspect classification

government must show exceedingly persuasive justification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

proving discriminatory classification

A
  • law discriminatory on its face
  • law facially neutral, but applied in a discriminatory way with intent (ex: prices differ or eligibility for exemption differ based on race)
  • discriminatory motive for a facially neutral and neutrally applied law (difficult- must show evidence of a history of discrimination)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

racial set asides

A

strict scrutiny. if past discrimination, satisfies compelling state interest.
must be persistent and readily identifiable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

diversity as justification for moving students of different races

A

strict scrutiny, and only compelling interest for universities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

important interest for gender classification

A

remedying past discrimination and inequality of opportunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

alienage classifications (citizenship) and state law

A

must meet strict scrutiny
BUT if: participation in self-government and offices involving important public policy…must meet rational basis

ex of self-government: voting, jury, public office
important public policy: public school teacher- primary and secondary, probation officer, police officer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Congressional discrimination against aliens

A

plenary power to regulate immigration, so may deny benefits. as long as not arbitrary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

undocumented aliens- state discrimination

A

not suspect classification. subject to rational basis as long as not totally arbitrary

Law denying education to alien children was not rationally related to legit gov interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

state discrimination against aliens (not undocumented)

A

strict scrutiny (re: welfare, jobs, licenses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

legitimacy (illegitimate children do not receive a benefit, for example)

A

quasi suspect justification

intermediate scrutiny- substantially related to important government interest (inheritance restriction and benefit restrictions failed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

sexual orientation

A

rational basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

government speech

A

not subject to First Amendment. government can promote its own views.

generally can fund private messages if on viewpoint neutral basis. however, can fund artists based on content.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

content regulation

A

must meet strict scrutiny.
types of content reg:
subject matter- restricted to certain topics
viewpoint- restricted to certain points of view

note: can place burdens on obscenity and defamation due to its content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

content neutral law

A

need only meet intermediate scrutiny.
must advance important interests unrelated to suppression of speech
must not burden substantially more speech than necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

overbroad

A

regulation prohibits a substantial amount of protected speech in relation to its plainly legitimate sweep (no entering private property to promote any cause without a license, for example)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

expressive conduct

A

conduct intended to communicate, or that could be reasonably perceived as communicating a message

government can regulate conduct communicating speech if

1) govt has an important interest unrelated to suppressing speech
2) regulation’s incidental burden on speech no greater than necessary

campaign contribution limit is constitutional
spending limit unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

unprotected speech

A
  1. obscenity
  2. fighting words- would provoke retaliation in a reasonable person
  3. true threats- words likely to place a specific person or group in fear of imminent harm
  4. incitement of illegal activity- directed to producing or inciting illegal activity and likely to do so.
  5. false advertising
  6. defamation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

obscenity

A

describes or depicts conduct that, taken as a whole:

  • appeals to the Prurient interest, under a community standard
  • is patently Offensive, under a community standard
  • lacks erious historical, artistic, political, or scientific Value by national standards

(POV)

private possession may not be punished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

child pornography

A

state may prohibit altogether even if not obscene, so long as minors actually used in the film

private possession may be punished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

profane and indecent speech

A

generally protected

except: broadcast media may ban because pervasive, public schools may ban

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

commercial speech

A

advertising for illegal activity, false or misleading ads are not protected and may be banned.

other speech regulations (heavy int scrutiny):

  • must serve substantial govt interest
  • directly advance the interest
  • narrowly tailored to serve the interest (but need not be least restrictive alternative- just reas. fit b/w goal and means chosen to achieve)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

defamation- public concern

A

P must prove falsity; public figure P must prove actual malice, private figure negligence

if private figure only proves negligence and can’t prove actual malice, must prove their actual damages and they don’t get punitive damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

limited and nonpublic forum test

A

viewpoint neutral regulation
bears a reasonable relationship to a legitimate government purpose

i.e. rational basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

private property first amendment

A

there is no first amendment right to use private property for speech purposes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

punishing membership in a group

A

implicates freedom of association.
must prove that person actively affiliated
knew of illegal activities
with specific intent to further the illegal activity

56
Q

types of govt law/action that can and cannot be challenged on free exercise grounds

A

a) general conduct laws- cannot challenge (law applies generally to everyone)
b) law specifically designed to interfere- may challenge
c) refusal to grant exemptions- generally may not challenge, unless unemployment compensation for someone who quits job for religious reasons

57
Q

takings: use regs

A
  • govt can regulate use through zoning ordinances: usually not a taking

use regs that are takings
1) physical appropriation
2) deny all economic use (decrease in value not taking if economic viable use remains)
3) unreasonably interferes w/ distinct investment backed expectations (bought the land having spent money, expecting to use it certain way)

58
Q

government employee fired for speech

A

two tests-
1) matter of public concern, unrelated to official duties- balance employee’s rights as a citizen to comment on the matter vs. govt interest in efficient performance of job
2) not matter of pub concern- deferential to govt as to whether disruptive
EXCEPT- statements made in course of official duty may ALWAYS be punished (regardless of public concern)

59
Q

incitement

A

clear and present danger test:

  • directed to producing or inciting imminent lawless action
  • likely to produce or incite imminent lawless action
60
Q

fighting words

A

fighting words- personally abusive words likely to incite immediate physical retaliation when addressed to an ordinary person
-very narrowly read. “fuck the draft” not fighting words
-statutes prohibiting cannot be content based!! (ex: insulting words based on race, religion)

61
Q

content v. conduct- scrutiny

A

-content regulation: presumed unconstitutional. govt must prove necessary to serve compelling purpose & narrowly tailored to serve that purpose

if content neutral- intermediate scrutiny

conduct: gov may regulate content related to speech through content neutral, time place and manner regulations

62
Q

intermediate scrutiny test

A

important government purpose (unrelated to speech)

do not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further the purpose

63
Q

declaratory judgment standing (aka no advisory opinion rule)

A

must be present harm or specific threat of future harm

must show they have engaged in, or wish to engage in, specific conduct
challenged action poses a real and immediate danger

64
Q

analyzing the constitutionality of restrictions on running for office

A

implicates the 14th amendment- right to vote
filing fees that are too high for indigents fail.

other restrictions- must be reasonable, nondiscriminatory means of promoting important state interest

65
Q

zoning ordinances limiting operation of adult bookstores: 1st amendment

A

restriction constitutional if

1) designed to promote substantial interests and 2) does not prohibit all such entertainment

66
Q

If Congress mandates that funds be spent for a certain purpose, can President refuse?

A

No, the president may not impound.

67
Q

takings- when found

A
  • traditionally: takings clause only applied when govt physically appropriated property
  • today: taking applies when govt takes action that is a physical invasion, destruction of, or denial of all economic use of property
  • decreasing economic value not a taking unless no economically viable use
68
Q

takings- public use

A

rationally related to legitimate public purpose (health, welfare, safety, moral, social, economic goals)

69
Q

justiciability / case or controversy

A

whether a federal court can hear a case. (whether it can get its ARMS around it). must be a case or controversy. meaning:

  1. not Advisory opinion (exception: dec relief if parties have a genuine dispute)
  2. must be Ripe- a) dispute has developed so that it is concrete enough for the court to issue a decision and b) hardship in making p wait or provoke enforcement if court does not hear it. not based on uncertain future events (unless people are already acting as if the future event will happen and P is harmed- immediate harm exception)
  3. must not be Moot- live controversy at all stages of the case, unless :
    a law or policy affects something that occurs over a short period (pregnancy, elections) that can repeat or
    if D stops doing something that harms P but could start again or
    Class rep claim can become moot if another class members claim is still viable
  4. P has Standing-
    a) a particular injury that specifically affects P and in fact exists- not hypothetical ; b) causation of the injury by D’s conduct;
    c) redressability by the court (ruling would eliminate harm to p).
  5. Must not be an independent adequate state law ground for an appealed judgment so that even if fed court decided the issue of the federal law, the case would have the same outcome under state law.
  6. Must not be an unsettled question of state law
70
Q

other reasons there may be no case or controversy

A

abstention- there is an unsettled issue of state law

political question- the decision should be made by another branch of govt per the constitution, or the judicial process can’t resolve the dispute

eleventh amendment bar on suits against states. exceptions
-if federal government or another state sues.
-suits against state officers if an injunction is sought as to an unconstitutional policy, or order would compel payment of damages by the state.
-if the state consents to the lawsuit by express waiver or implied consent to yield to federal powers (ED and military)

71
Q

congress’s powers

A

-taxing power
-spending power
-commerce power
Postal power- reas restrictions on use of the mail
-federal property power- acquire, dispose of, and regulate
-necessary & proper to its exercise of its other powers
-declare war, raise and support army and navy, create rules for military tribunals
-citizenship/ immigration- exclusive power over. Can pass laws excluding aliens.
-patent and copyright
-Investigatory power

72
Q

standing in a lawsuit alleging congress overburdened free speech

A

Citizens whose free speech wouldn’t be protected can sue on free speech law that is overbroad

73
Q

speech or debate clause

A

senators and representatives cannot be questioned about speech in either house, even if it is defamatory. Also applies to state legislators.

newspapers will not be immune for repeating defamatory statement made in either house, however.

74
Q

infringement of fundamental rights

A

must pass strict scrutiny. test = necessary to protect compelling interest.

may be an equal protection (if affects certain people) or due process problem (if affects all people)

75
Q

standing on behalf of others

A

organizational standing- the injury is related to organization’s purpose and its members are harmed, and no need to have members sue separately (ie to prove damages)

Third party with own standing
can assert others’ rights when
it would be difficult for others to do so themselves (either to protect identity, because they have limited funds, or when the plaintiff and injured party have a close relationship like a guardian/child)

76
Q

what is the proper court for cases between states?

A

Supreme Court- no other court has jurisdiction

77
Q

spending power

A

congress’s power to spend money (provide for the general welfare) allows congress to condition grants of federal funds if:

1) not unduly coercive
2) the condition is clear
3) the condition is related to the program’s purpose
4) condition does not violate the constitution.

78
Q

tax power

A

power to impose taxes to provide for the general welfare or produce revenue

tax can be for any purpose not prohibited by constitution (establishment, first amendment for example)

cannot compel behavior (as a penalty) but can try to influence it

79
Q

commerce power

A

Power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce

Includes regulations of
-channels of interstate commerce
-instrumentalities of interstate commerce (trains, cars, planes)
-activities with a substantial effect on commerce when taken together. Must have rational basis to explain effect on commerce

the latter ground is very broad and includes the right to prevent private discrimination since, in the aggregate, businesses discriminating reduces commerce. another example is minimum wage and overtime.

80
Q

president powers

A

-take care - enforcement of congressional laws over domestic affairs. Also has power to issue executive orders but validity depends on whether congress has explicitly or implicitly authorized presidential action through a congressional law or at least doesn’t usurp another branch’s power or has historical precedent. If congress has said they don’t want something likely invalid

-treaties
-sending troops to war, military action to protect American lives and property
-appointing justices and ambassadors
-removal of high level purely executive officers (others like judges must be removed for bad behavior)
-veto
-pardon for criminal offenses
- represent the country in foreign affairs

81
Q

priority of treaties; executive agreements

A

no priority over constitution- can’t be unconstitutional
priority over state law
priority over federal laws passed before treaty. (federal laws have priority if passed after a treaty).

executive agreements > state law
federal law > executive agreements

82
Q

state police power

A

power to provide for health and safety of state citizens. rational basis test unless they implicate a fundamental right or discriminate against a suspect or quasi suspect class.

83
Q

intergovernmental immunity- taxation and regulation of the feds

A

the state can’t tax the federal govt.

note: federal govt. can only tax state departments/entities if it taxes similar private ones

State can’t impose requirements on federal government or agents performing federal functions

84
Q

analysis of discrimination against out of state residents

A

dormant commerce clause
privilege and immunities

85
Q

rights incorporated to the states by 14th amendment for due process and equal protection purposes

A

amendments 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9

3 deals with quartering of troops; 7 deals with right to jury trial in civil case. also right to grand jury indictment of 5th amendment not incorporated.

14th amendment says no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property w/o due process and equal protection of the law

86
Q

contract clause

A

a law will be invalid if it
substantially impairs existing contract rights and
is not for a legitimate public purpose and tailored to that purpose

reducing state expenditures is not a legit public purpose.

the court will scrutinize more if the state/city is a party and trying to impact its own rights. however, a contract can’t limit or give up a city/state’s police power

87
Q

equal protection prohibits discriminatory laws by the __

A

states

88
Q

public forum

A

usually subject to strict scrutiny because traditionally speech is freely allowed here. examples are public parks, sidewalks, streets and the internet.

however will be judged by a lesser test if the regulations are content neutral and leave open alternative channels of communication. in that case the regulations must be narrowly tailored to an important government interest.

important interests include pedestrian and vehicular traffic regulation, noise, privacy, litter control, aesthetics

89
Q

designated public forum

A

when a public school or university sets aside a specific time and place for speech activities by its practice or policies.

90
Q

buffer zones are an example of ___

A

content neutral time, place and manner restriction. strict scrutiny will not apply

they do burden a lot of speech so more likely to be upheld if legislature has tried other restrictions first.

91
Q

limited public forum and nonpublic forum

A

government property that is only opened up to speech activities on a very limited basis = limited public forum

nonpublic forum= government property not used for speech

92
Q

defamation- public figure

A

public figures include people who hold office or run for it, celebrities, podcasters.

P must prove actual malice (reckless disregard for the truth of the statement or knowing the statement was false)

93
Q

freedom of association- scrutiny

A

strict scrutiny, regulations must serve compelling interest

94
Q

contribution limits & free speech

A

contributions to a candidate can be limited, closely drawn to sufficiently important interest of preventing corruption or appearance of corruption

95
Q

Is a law that prohibits conduct that is involved in religious practice, or requires conduct that would violate religious beliefs, valid under free exercise?

A

Generally applicable laws or other government action that burdens religious practices will be upheld under the Free Exercise Clause unless it can be shown that the law or action was motivated by a desire to interfere with religion (in which case, it will be upheld only if it passes strict scrutiny).

96
Q

religion- establishment of a religion

A

in determining whether government action is valid under the Establishment Clause, courts will consider whether the action is neutral with regard to religion.

If it is not neutral, courts will then consider whether the government action accords with history and faithfully reflects the understanding of the Founding Fathers.

97
Q

religious discrimination

A

When a person claims that she is being punished for her religious beliefs, the court may consider whether the person challenging the law sincerely holds those beliefs.

98
Q

congress grant of standing

A

explicitly by the legislation itself (ex any private citizen even if not injured )
impliedly if plaintiff is within the class of people the law seeks to protect

99
Q

congress delegation of legislative power

A

can delegate to administrative agencies if there is a standard for them to use when applying the law.

if an agency tries to pass regulations about a major question (substantial economic or political impact) they must point to clear delegating language in a statute AND Court will also look at whether the agency historically has asserted the power

100
Q

does the commerce clause allow a regulation that requires people to buy something?

A

no the commerce clause only allows a regulation of existing activity

101
Q

proving preemption

A

court will presume that congress did not intend to preempt state regulation, unless the legislative language or other evidence shows a clear federal congressional intent to do so

102
Q

is state action necessary in a claim alleging that a policy or practice requires involuntary servitude (13th amend violation)?

A

no, it applies to both government and private actors

103
Q

equal protection- classes not protected and subject to rational basis scrutiny

A

age, disability, poverty

104
Q

difference between equal protection and substantive due process analysis re: fundamental rights

A

when a fundamental right is limited under either clause of the constitution, it must meet strict scrutiny. must serve a compelling state interest.

105
Q

ex post facto law

A

a law that retroactively alters a CRIM law to criminalize something that was not illegal when it was done, increase the punishment, or make a crime easier to prove

106
Q

things subject to int scrutiny

A

-laws discriminating against quasi suspect class
-content neutral speech regulation in PF, DPF
-contract clause
-commercial speech (heavy intermediate scrutiny)

107
Q

things subject to strict scrutiny

A

content based speech regulations
impairment of fundamental right
discrimination of suspect class (race)
gerrymandering on basis of race

108
Q

use of military troops- presidential power

A

The President as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces has broad discretion to use American troops in foreign countries, even if not used for military purposes and are used for aid.

109
Q

can a state impose regulations on a military base?

A

No, the supremacy clause prohibits the state from regulating the federal government in its operations of military bases

110
Q

Who can sue a state? What is the source of the limit? Exceptions ?

A

General rule: states can’t be sued by private citizens unless state consents because of the tenth amendment grant of sovereign immunity

States are not immune from suit by other states and federal govt

Consent is either express (ex- in tort claims acts) or implied (by consenting to fed power of eminent domain and military formation, states agree to be sued in ED and be sued if they don’t comply with fed law re military and veterans)

Congress can remove immunity - ex private citizens can sue for discrimination in violation of fourteenth amendment
State officers can be sued for personal liability or injunctions requiring state to pay money in future to comply with

111
Q

11th amendment and exceptions

A

States cannot be sued in state or fed court

Exception are lawsuits brought by federal gov and other states or suits against state officers for (a) damages from the officer or (b) orders requiring state to comply with law and pay money in future

Following claims by private citizens or foreign governments are barred :

(I) Actions against state governments for damages;

(ii) Actions against state governments for injunctive or declaratory relief where the state is named as a party;

(iii) Actions against state government officers where the effect of the suit will be that retroactive damages will be paid from the state treasury

Actions that are the functional equivalent of a quiet title action that would divest the state of ownership of land; and

(iv) Actions against state government officers for violating state law.

112
Q

One person one vote

A

Whenever a state or federal gov establishes districts for purposes of electing representatives the number of persons in each district may not vary significantly.

Federal districts are scrutinized more than state ones- difference in state districts must not be unjustifiably large.

113
Q

Tenth amendment commandeering

A

federal government can’t pass laws that commandeer state officials - require them to pass certain laws or take certain actions

114
Q

Bicameralism and presentment

A

Bicameralism- a law, amendment or repeal of a law must pass both houses of congress
Presentment- must be presented to president to veto in whole or in part

115
Q

President failure to veto in 10 days

A

In session - becomes law
Out of session - vetoed

116
Q

State discriminatory taxes

A

Taxes that only tax out of state businesses or citizens or subject them to higher rates violate commerce clause

117
Q

Non discriminatory state taxes

A

Valid if tax
1) applies to an activity with a substantial nexus to the state (ex: doing business in the state)
2) apportioned fairly based on a formula
3) is fairly related to the services or benefits provided by the state

118
Q

Can a state sue the federal government?

A

Only if the federal government consents

119
Q

Congress power under the fourteenth amendment

A

Can’t create new rights
Can only pass narrowly tailored laws to protect rights already recognized by the courts

120
Q

13th amendment

A

1) Prohibits involuntary servitude- forced labor (with or without compensation) under threat of force, jail or legal action

Does not include prison labor, drafts compelling military service, or jury duty.

2) allows Congress to prohibit any private conduct that Congress deems to be a “badge” or “incident” of slavery (ex: refusing to hire, rent to, or do business with blacks)

121
Q

Due process - deprivation of liberty

A

Freedom of action - physical freedom (right not to be in jail or in a mental institution) as well as right to enter into a contract or have employment

Freedoms guaranteed by the constitution (govt employees have right to free speech and thus are owed a hearing on whether the speech is protected as a matter of public concern)

122
Q

Due process - property

A

Real property, personal property, or government benefits or continued govt employment when person proves they have an entitlement to it (reas expectation of continued receipt)

For govt employment - an employment contract or a termination for cause employment

123
Q

if congress delegates power to another agency, can congress control how the agency exercises the power after the fact?*

A

no, congress can only include standards in the legislation itself

124
Q

government powers framework

A

Who is acting?

Feds (Pres, Congress, Courts):
Enumerated powers (Constitution)

States:
Broad
Limits from Constitution

FEBL

125
Q

showing needed for 14th amendment power exercise by congress

A

congress is remedying or preventing violation of a right already recognized and is not creating a new right or expanding an existing right

a history or pattern of state violation of the right

the legislation is congruent and proportional to the violation

126
Q

Individual Rights approach

A

Fundamental Rights
Discriminatory- facial, applied, impact
Classification
Burden
Scrutiny

Foul Dictator captured Black Slaves

127
Q

Speech

A

State action
Place
Content
Unprotected
Manner
Burden
Scrutiny

Some People Can’t Understand Maintaining Bigoted Speech

128
Q

if a law affects a fundamental right and suspect class how should it be analyzed?

A

substantive due process & equal protection

129
Q

market participant exception- state choices that are protected

A

a state can prefer its own residents when:

setting prices for in state vs out of state
selling products
buying products
granting subsidies
hiring labor

130
Q

can a president decide on his own not to abide by a treaty that was signed and approved by congress?

A

Yes, through his power to represent the US in day to day foreign relations. very broad power!

131
Q

standard of review for allegedly discriminatory law when there’s little proof of discriminatory application or purpose

A

rational basis

132
Q

what types of free speech laws are void?

A

laws giving public officials unrestricted discretion- they need to have defined standards (ex: permit requirements)

laws that do not give enough guidance about what kind of speech it prohibits- void for vagueness

133
Q

Appointment of officers

A

The Appointment Clause of the Constitution permits Congress to vest appointments of inferior officers only in the President, the courts, or the heads of departments

134
Q

Standing by being a taxpayer

A

Generally not a basis for standing because they wouldn’t have a particular injury that’s different from the general public
However for congress spending, can challenge on establishment clause violation grounds

135
Q

Where do suits between states have to be brought ?

A

In the Supreme Court