Con Law - Mid Term Case Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Katz v. US

A

eavesdropping by electronic means, has 4th Amendment protection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

US v. Dunn

A

An area surrounding a dwelling that is part of an occupants daily activities, which is considered curtilage, and warrants 4th Amendment requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Week v. US

A

4th Amendment bars the use of evidence from an illegal search and seizure. This applies to all federal cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mapp v. Ohio

A

4th Amendment exclusionary rule applies to the states through the due process clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

State v. Larson

A

Any entry into a threshold, no matter how much, warrants 4th Amendment considerations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Minnesota v. Carter

A

A person does not have standing if they are just visiting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State v. Kieffer

A

In Wisconsin there is no presumption of common authority to consent to search.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Florida v. Bostick

A

A consent to search must be voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

State v. Williams

A

A “Badger Stop” is lawful, when the initial stop clearly ended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

State v. Matejka

A

Consent to search a car extends to all items found in the car regardless of ownership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Minnesota v. Dickerson

A

Contraband may be seized by feel/touch if the identity of the contraband was immediately apparent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Illinois v. Caballes

A

A well-trained narcotics dogs can sniff the exterior of an automobile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

NY v. Class

A

You cannot move an item to view another. Unless you are looking for a VIN.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

US v. Garcia

A

Usin GPS is not a seizure, and does not constitute as a search.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

State v. Ferguson

A

Enter a zone of privacy, without warrant, for a jailable offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Griffen v. Wisconsin

A

Search of a home by probation officers for reasonable grounds, does not violate 4th Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Chimel v. CA

A

After arrest, Search a person and area within their immediate control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

NY v. Belton

A

After arrest, Search includes entire passenger compartment, including containers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Thorton v US

A

SIA is permissible when the defendant is first contacted outside his vehilce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Arizona v. Gant

A

Arrestee is within reaching distance of vehicle. Reasonable suspicion the vehicle contains evidence of the arrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Carroll v. US

A

Probable cause evidence is in a vehicle, search and seizure without warrant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

PA v. Mimms

A

After lawful stop, a driver can be removed without reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Maryland v. Williams

A

After lawful stop, a passanger can be removed withou reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

State v. Denk

A

Containers within a vehicle can be searched for the officers safety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Georgia v. Randolph

A

Consent search can be made when no present co-tenant objects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Terry v. Ohio

A

Reasonable suspicion, officer may stop, question, and frisk a person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

State v. Newers

A

Registered owner of a vehicle is the driver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Whren v. US

A

If a stop is vailid, with reasonable suspicion, the motivation of the officer is irrelevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

US v. Wooden

A

A tip from a caller, with compelling factors is sufficent for a lawful stop.

30
Q

State v. Flynn

A

Admints to having identification, but refuses to give identification, officer may take wallet and look for ID.

31
Q

State v. Goyer

A

Suspect does not have the right to terminate an investigation, the officer has the right to physically restrain the suspect with a reasonable amount of force.

32
Q

Michigan v. Summers

A

Any arrest requires probable cause.

33
Q

State v. Secrist

A

Smell of THC constitutes probable cause.

34
Q

State v. Arias

A

A probable cause search, allows additional time for a K9 unit to arrive.

35
Q

State v. Trammel

A

Controlled substance found in passanger compartment, arrest all passangers.

36
Q

State v. Riddle

A

Controlled substance found in trunk, arrest driver only.

37
Q

eavesdropping by electronic means, has 4th Amendment protection

A

Katz v. US

38
Q

An area surrounding a dwelling that is part of an occupants daily activities, which is considered curtilage, and warrants 4th Amendment requirements

A

US v. Dunn

39
Q

4th Amendment bars the use of evidence from an illegal search and seizure. This applies to all federal cases.

A

Week v. US

40
Q

4th Amendment exclusionary rule applies to the states through the due process clause.

A

Mapp v. Ohio

41
Q

Any entry into a threshold, no matter how much, warrants 4th Amendment considerations.

A

State v. Larson

42
Q

A person does not have standing if they are just visiting.

A

Minnesota v. Carter

43
Q

In Wisconsin there is no presumption of common authority to consent to search.

A

State v. Kieffer

44
Q

A consent to search must be voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly.

A

Florida v. Bostick

45
Q

A “Badger Stop” is lawful, when the initial stop clearly ended.

A

State v. Williams

46
Q

Consent to search a car extends to all items found in the car regardless of ownership.

A

State v. Matejka

47
Q

Contraband may be seized by feel/touch if the identity of the contraband was immediately apparent.

A

Minnesota v. Dickerson

48
Q

A well-trained narcotics dogs can sniff the exterior of an automobile.

A

Illinois v. Caballes

49
Q

You cannot move an item to view another. Unless you are looking for a VIN.

A

NY v. Class

50
Q

Usin GPS is not a seizure, and does not constitute as a search.

A

US v. Garcia

51
Q

Enter a zone of privacy, without warrant, for a jailable offense.

A

State v. Ferguson

52
Q

Search of a home by probation officers for reasonable grounds, does not violate 4th Amendment.

A

Griffen v. Wisconsin

53
Q

After arrest, Search a person and area within their immediate control.

A

Chimel v. CA

54
Q

After arrest, Search includes entire passenger compartment, including containers.

A

NY v. Belton

55
Q

SIA is permissible when the defendant is first contacted outside his vehilce.

A

Thorton v US

56
Q

Arrestee is within reaching distance of vehicle. Reasonable suspicion the vehicle contains evidence of the arrest.

A

Arizona v. Gant

57
Q

Probable cause evidence is in a vehicle, search and seizure without warrant.

A

Carroll v. US

58
Q

After lawful stop, a driver can be removed without reason.

A

PA v. Mimms

59
Q

After lawful stop, a passanger can be removed withou reason.

A

Maryland v. Williams

60
Q

Containers within a vehicle can be searched for the officers safety.

A

State v. Denk

61
Q

Consent search can be made when no present co-tenant objects.

A

Georgia v. Randolph

62
Q

Reasonable suspicion, officer may stop, question, and frisk a person.

A

Terry v. Ohio

63
Q

Registered owner of a vehicle is the driver.

A

State v. Newers

64
Q

If a stop is vailid, with reasonable suspicion, the motivation of the officer is irrelevant.

A

Whren v. US

65
Q

A tip from a caller, with compelling factors is sufficent for a lawful stop.

A

US v. Wooden

66
Q

Admints to having identification, but refuses to give identification, officer may take wallet and look for ID.

A

State v. Flynn

67
Q

Suspect does not have the right to terminate an investigation, the officer has the right to physically restrain the suspect with a reasonable amount of force.

A

State v. Goyer

68
Q

Any arrest requires probable cause.

A

Michigan v. Summers

69
Q

Smell of THC constitutes probable cause.

A

State v. Secrist

70
Q

A probable cause search, allows additional time for a K9 unit to arrive.

A

State v. Arias

71
Q

Controlled substance found in passanger compartment, arrest all passangers.

A

State v. Trammel

72
Q

Controlled substance found in trunk, arrest driver only.

A

State v. Riddle