Con Law cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

established the protective sweep- police can search the premises if the have a reasonable belief that there could be someone else who is posing a threat. Limited to where a person could be hiding.

A

Maryland v Buie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Established the search incident to arrest- police can search the area in the wingspan of someone arrested

A

Chimel v California

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

established hot pursuit exception to warrant requirement.

A

Warden v Hayden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Established that the police cant make a warrant-less, non consensual entry into a home to make a routine felony arrest

A

Payton v New York

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

established that use of deadly force in apprehension of fleeing felons is illegal unless the police has probable cause that the suspect poses a significant threat.

A

Tennessee v Garner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Established plain view doctrine

A

Horton v California

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Established the reading of Miranda rights to those in custody or being interrogated

A

Miranda v Arizona

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

coerced confessions not allowed

A

Brown v Mississippi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

fourth amendment allows police to enter private property without warrant to conduct a knock-and-talk investigation

A

US v Banks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

established “shocks the conscience” doctrine

A

Rochin v California

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

established the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine

A

Silverthorne Lumber Co v US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

established exclusionary rule- stuff obtained illegally not admissible in court

A

Mapp v Ohio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

unprovoked flight in a high crime area, coupled with the circumstances can justify reasonable suspicion to do an investigatory stop

A

Illinois v Wardlow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

juveniles have the right to due process in delinquency proceedings

A

In re Gault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

people have the right the counsel during critical stages

A

Massiah v US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

established the right to waive your right to counsel

A

Faretta v California

17
Q

police can only search a vehicle incident to arrest if arestee is in reaching distance of passenger compartment at the time of the search or they reasonably believe there could b evidence in there

A

Arizona v Gant

18
Q

established right that to counsel during interrogation must be clearly communitcated

A

Escebedo v Illinois

19
Q

when police have a reasonable belief that public safety is in danger, they can ask questions to protect the public without providing Miranda warnings

A

New York v Quarles

20
Q

established right to counsel for all defendants facing potential jail sentence, regardless of crime’s severity and sentence length.

A

Argersinger v Hamiln