con law and tort

Question 1

1st amd. and invasion of privacy

Answer 1

1st amd. And Invasion of privacy( not if public concern and no actual malice and obtained legitimately) , defamation, (if public person then need actual malice), trespass (must be intentionally committed)

Question 2

1st amd. and defamation

Answer 2

• [ ] 1st amd topics-defamation, fighting words, incitement, ….
• [ ] Actual malice *only needed for public figure (knowledge of faulty or reckless disregard) so if honestly thought was true or other ppl did not have reason to doubt the statement then excused.

Question 3

1st amd. and trespass

Answer 3

may see a person trespassing by entering somewhere without permission. even if purpose not concluded just need to trespass and it’s enough.