Con Law Flashcards
Standing
Whether a party can bring a matter to court
- injury in fact
- Causation- D caused the injury
- Redressability- is the court likely to remedy the harm
GR: a tax payer lacks standing to challenge a federal expenditure of tax revenue
Exception: have standing to challenges if violates establishment clause or an express constitutional provision
look for someone challenging the law.
Associational Standing
An organization may sue for its members if the members would have standing to sue and the interests are germane to organizations purpose
Ripeness and Mootness
Whether a federal court has the power to review/enforce the law
- Hardship- will there be without court involvement. Court more likely to hear the greater the hardship
- Fitness of the Issue- does the court have everything it needs to decide on the matter
Look at P is harmed and injury has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur imminently
Mootness: P must present a live case or controversy through non-frivolous money damages
Lack of Standing
- Under the U.S. Const. courts cannot render advisory opinions. They are opinions that concern hypothetical facts and abstract issues that do not satisfy requirements of standing.
- soverign immunity-under 11th amend a P does not possess standing in a federal court to file an action seeking damages against any one of the states. It protects the state from a law suit without its consent
GR: a tax payer lacks standing to challenge a federal expenditure of tax revenue
Ex: if statute violates the establishment clause or an express constitutional provision
11th Amendment
sovereign immunity
As a general rule, Under the 11th amend of the U.S. constitution a P does not possess standing in a federal court to file an action seeking damages against any one of the states.
An exception to this general rule is The Federal Tort Claims Act, which allows a P to sue a federal governmental entity and/or federal employees who have caused a P injuries as a result of certain tortious conduct.
A state can also choose however to consent to such a suit and partially waive their sovereign immunity
Supremacy Clause
- when state law and federal law conflict. Federal law wins because supreme law of the land
- States are generally prohibited from enacting laws that interfere with operations/activities of federal government. A state is NOT allowed to regulate the federal government unless
1. fed government consents
2. state law is consistent with existing federal law
Can mention Preemption- Because of the supremacy clause federal law is considered to preempt or override state law. Exception: when you can comply with both federal and state law
10th Amendment
State Police power to protect for health, safety, welfare and morals of its citizens as long as it doesn’t conflict with the U.S. constitution and passes RB
- Commandeer rule- fed gov cannot require a state to do anything
- School officials have a police power to protect students and staff from threatened or potential violence or illegal activity on campus when lawfully acting in loco parentis (in the place of the parents) as quasi-parents to the students.
Necessary and Proper Clause
Art 1. sec. 8 congress can adopt all laws that are necessary and proper to exercise authority
- congress can choose any means to carry out power (enumerated powers)
Commerce Clause
The usual rule prohibiting congress from overruling a constitutional decision by SCOTUS does NOT apply to enactments based on congress’s commerce power because the constitution gives congress plenary authority to regulate conduct that is within the commerce power
N&aP clause gives congress power to
1. regulate channels of IC
2. regulate instrumentalities
3. activities that have a substantial effect on IC
- Broad power, plenary, mention aggregation (congress may aggregate local effects that have a substantial effect on IC)
Presidents Enumerated Powers
- Veto
• no line-item veto: sign some parts veto other
• Every act of congress must be approved by president unless passed over disapproval
(veto) by 2/3 vote in each house. President has 10 days to exercise veto power. If no action bill becomes a law if congress is in session, otherwise automatic veto if out of session.
2.Power of Appointment- joint with Congress as long as congress has no regulatory rule making authority. If there is then members need to be appointed by prez and approved by senate - Pardon- federal crimes only
- commander in chief
- treaties
6.Executive orders & agreements - foreign relations and recognition of nations
Congressional Enumerated Powers
- Tax- plenary
- Spend
Courts apply RB standard- reasonable benefit to general welfare
- concrete objectives
- Adequate criteria
- Prez may veto an appropriations bill (on spending) but congress may OVERRIDE IT
- Commerce clause- plenary
- Declare War
- Foreign Affairs
- Coin Money
- Aliens
- Federal Land- no fed police power but MILD
- Can limit SCOTU’s appellate J
- congress can delegate/give away power but CANNOT take power away from the other branches (ie. congress does NOT retain veto power)
Presentment Clause
Art. 1 sec. 7 of constitution says every order resolution or vote to which the concurrence of the senate and house may be necessary shall be presented to the president
Dormant Commerce Clause
AKA Negative Implications of CC
state/local laws are unconditional if they place an excessive burden on IC
Face- apply SS
Incidental- IS
Market Participant- exception when state controls/runs the industry
Privleges and Immunities
protects citizens/corp/entities (NOT ALIENS) from discrimination of instate vs. out of state
if discrimination is fundamental rights= choice will be EP or P&I (14th)
if out of state citizens doing biz= choice will be P&I (Art. IV) or IC (Commerce Clause)
- generally when see biz/commercial value= any interference will be IC issue. If see IC as answer GR is pick that.
Exceptions: IC will lose if no commercial/monetary value or commander rule
When P& I applies you apply SS. Can discriminate if can show SUNSTANTIAL JUSTIFICATION and NO LESS RESTRICTIVE means to save the problem that non residents are causing that they are trying to correct with their state law
EP DOES NOT APPLY TO LEGISLATIVE ACTS
Levels of Scrutiny
Strict (Suspect)- race, alienage, national origin, law is necessary to achieve a compelling gov purpose. Gov has burden
Intermediate (Quasi-Suspect)-substantially related to an important government purpose. Gov has burden. General, and illegitimacy
Rational Basis (non-Suspect)- rationally related to a legitimate gov purpose
Proceedural Due Process
if a state is to take away someones life, liberty or property then a fair process must exists involving NOTICE and HEARING by a neutral decision maker and the right to appeal at least once
property rights must have vested
gov can be liable in emergency situation if conduct shocks the conscience