Con Law Flashcards

1
Q

Justiciability Issues

A

Standing, Ripeness, Mootness, Political Questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Standing

A

A federal court cannot decide a case unless the plaintiff has standing—i.e., a concrete interest in the outcome—to bring it.

Standing requires injury in fact, causation, and redressability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Injury in Fact

A

Injury in fact requires an injury be concrete and particularized.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Future Injury (Standing)

A

A threat of future injury can sufficie, but it must be actual and imminent. For future injury, can only seek injunction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Redressability

A

It must be likely (not just speculative that a favorable decision would redress plaintiff’s injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ripeness

A

There is no standing if there is no actual or imminent threat of harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Taxpayer standing

A

A taxpayer does not have standing to file suit to challenge allocation of funds, but can challenge how much they owe on the tax bill. They can also challenge expenditures as violating the Establishiment Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Organizational Standing

A

An organization has standing if it has suffered an injury. It can bring an action on behalf of its members if 1) its members could satisfy standing in their own right and 2) the interests are germane to the organization’s purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Third Party STanding

A

A plaintiff only has standing on behalf of third party if: 1) 3p is unable to assert their own rights; 2) there is a special relationship; or 3) injury to P will affect relationship with 3p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mootness

A

There is no standing when legal proceedings will have no effect becuase there is no longer a controversy.

Exceptions: capable of reptition yet evaiding review; D’s voluntary cessation; collateral legal consequences could affect P; class actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Declaratory Judgment

A

Courts may issue declaratory judgments that determine legal effect of proposed conduct without awarding damages or relief. The challenged action must pose a real and immediate danger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Political Questions Doctrine

A

The court will not rule on political questions, which arise when: i) Constitution has assigned decision-making to different branch; or
ii) Matter inherently not for judiciary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Eleventh Amendment

A

A federal court cannot hear an action by a private citizen or foreign country against a state government.

Exceptions:
- Constent by state
- Injunctive relief against state official (except state court judge or clerk)
- Money damages against state officer personally
- Prospective damages to be paid by state treasury in suit against state officer
- Congressional abrogation under 13th, 14th, or 15th amendments
- Structural waivers (actions brought by US government; bankruptcy proceeding; condemnation proceedings; war and defense power suits)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Congressional powers

A

The powers of congress are limited to those enumerated by the Constitution. Powers not granted to the fed gov nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the states and to the people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Commerce Clause

A

Congress has teh power to regulate channels, instrumentalities, and any activity substantially affecting interstate commerce, provided the regulation does not infringe upon any other right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Substantial effect on interstate commerce

A

May consider economic activity in the aggregate. Factors:

  1. Are the activities economic in nature? (presumed substantial effect)
  2. Regulation has jurisdictional element that limits reach to activities with direct connection to interstate commerce
  3. Express congressional findings about effect
  4. strong link between regulated activities and effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Tax Power

A

congress has the power to tax if it is reasonably related to raising revenue. The general welfare clause gives congress permission to exercise power to tax for any public purpose.

Congress may not tax exported goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Spending Power

A

Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare and can use that power to regulate by conditioning federal funding on such activity. (But can’t impose unconstitutional conditions.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Necessary and Proper

A

Enabling clause allowing Congress to execute its powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Enforcement Clauses

A

Power to pass “appropriate legislation” to enforce:
- elimination of racial discrimination, as one of badges and incidents of slavery (13th amendment)
- equal protection and due process rights (14th amendment)
- voting (15th amendment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

14th Amendment Power limitation

A

Must be “congruence and proportionality” between injury and means adopted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

15th Amendment Power limitation

A

Can’t treat states differently unless rationally justified by CURRENT circumstances (Shelby County)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

War Powers

A

Power to declare war, raise and support armies, provide and maintain a navy, make rules for land and naval forces, organize militia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Property Powers

A

Power to dispose of and make needful rules and regulations respecting territory or other property of US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Election Powers
Power to override state laws concerning federal elections
26
Naturalization Power
Exclusive authority to establish uniform rule of naturalization
27
Investigatory Power
Broad authority (via N+P) to conduct investigations incident to power to legislate
28
Removal Power
president may remove executive appointees without cause, and Congress may not shield with multi-tiered system
29
Appointment Power
Officers: Must be appointed by the president, with advice and consent of the senate Inferior officers: May be delegated to president alone, heads of executive departments, or the courts
30
Pardon Power
Power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the US, EXCEPT IMPEACHMENT. Limited to federal cases and may be granted any time after crime committed.
31
Three zones of presidential power
Express or implied authorization of congress: authority at its highest, action presumed valid Congress has not spoken: authority is diminished, and action invalid if interferes with another branch Congress has spoken to contrary: authority is at its lowest, action likely invalid
32
Treaty power
President has exclusive power to negotiate treaties, which must be ratified with 2/3 approval of senate
33
Executive agreements
President has power to enter into EAs, which do not require senate approval
34
Troop deployment
President can take miliary action without declaration of war in case of actual hostilities against US
35
Dormant Commerce Clause
State regulation of commerce cannot 1) discriminate against out-of-state commerce or 2) place an undue burden on interstate commerce.
36
Exceptions to Dormant Commerce Clause
state acting as a market participant rather than a regulator state and local government entities (but not private) performing traditional governmental function subsidies to own citizens (like in state college) Congressional permission
37
Undue Burden on Interstate commerce
Balance the objective and purpose of the state law against burden on interstate commerce.
38
Discriminate against interstate commerce
If the state law is discriminatory, must show 1) necessary to an important state interest and there is 2) no other nondiscriminatory means available.
39
State Taxation of Commerce
If congress has not already acted, a state may tax interstate commerce if it’s nondiscriminatory and does not place undue burden on interstate commerce. TEST: 1. Substantial nexus between activity being taxed and taxing state. 2. Tax must be fairly apportioned 3. Nondiscrimination 4. Fair relationship to services provided
40
Types of preemption
Express (explicit) Direct (impossible to comply with both) Indirect (state law frustrates federal purpose)
41
Privileges and Immunities (Article IV)
No state may deprive a citizen of another state the privileges and immunities it accords to its own citizens. Rights protected: fundamental rights or essential activites (not recreational activities)
42
Discrimination against out of state citizens
Discrimination against out-of-state citizens only valid if state can show: i) Substantial reason (nonresidents cause/are part of problem) ii) Discrimination bears substantial relationship to state’s objective
43
10th Amendment / Anticommandeering
Powers not granted to the fed gov nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the states and to the people. Federal government cannot commandeer state legislatures and force them to pass laws (though it can condition funds under spending power).
44
State Action Doctrine
Private conduct does not trigger constitutional guarantees, except: - traditional government function is performed by private persons - significant state involvement with private conduct such that government is pervasively entwined
45
Procedural Due Process (5th Amendment)
An individual may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Due process requires notice and opportunity to be heard.
46
Deciding what process is due
Court considers: i) private interest affected ii) value of additional or substitute safeguards iii) government’s interest and burden of additional process
47
Substantive Due Process (5th Amendment)
A governmental action infringing upon a fundamental right must satisfy strict scrutiny; an action infringing upon a non-fundamental right need only satisfy rational basis.
48
Fundamental Rights
Interstate travel Right to vote Privacy Second Amendment
49
Right to Privacy Includes
- Marriage - Contraception - Intimate sexual behavior - Procreation - Parental rights - Family relations - Obscene material in the home - Refusal of medical treatment - Privacy of medical information
50
Strict Scrutiny
Is it the least restrictive means of achieving a compelling government interest? (strict in theory, fatal in fact) Burden on government
51
Intermediate Scrutiny
Is it substantially related to an important government interest? Burden on governmentRa
52
Rational Basis
Is it rationally related to a legitimate state interest? Burden on challenger
53
Fundamental Rights and Suspect Classifications (EP)
Strict scrutiny
54
Suspect classifications
race, ethnicity, national origin, citizenship status (for state laws)
55
Gender / nonmarital children
Intermediate scrutiny
56
Other rights and classifications
rational basis review
57
Equal Protection Clause
The Equal Protection Clause provides that no state shall deprive its citizens of equal protection of the laws. To trigger strict or intermediate scrutiny, the challenger must show discriminatory intent.
58
Takings (Fifth Amendment)
Private property may not be taken for public use without just compensation.
59
Taking
Must occur through federal, state, or local government “taking” property by physically taking, rezoning, prohibiting development, etc. Two types: physical and regulatory
60
Physical taking
Government occupies land
61
REgulatory Taking
If has effect of decreasing value of plaintiff’s property TOTAL TAKING: reg leaves no viable use PARTIAL TAKING: affects some economic use; to determine whether it’s a taking, consider i) economic impact (value lost) and ii) reasonable expectation of return on investment and iii) character of regulation
62
Purpose of taking
must be taken for public use, such as health, safety, economic development
63
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ...
64
Freedom of Religion: Types
Establishment Free Exercise
65
Establishment
Government may not establish religion. Facial religious preference: strict scrutiny Non-facial: consider “historical practices and understandings”
66
Free exercise
Prohibits interference with person’s religious belief or conduct Intentional targeting of religious conduct: strict scrutiny Neutral laws: rational basis
67
Religious belief
the freedom to believe in any religion or none at all is absolutely protected and cannot be restricted by law
68
Freedom of Speech Analysis
1. Is it speech? (Expressive conduct v. speech) 2. If it's speech, is it content-based on its face or in application? STRICT SCRUTINY. 3. Is it content-neutral? RATIONAL BASIS (narrowly tailored to serve significant government interest and leaves open ample channels) 4. Where is the speech taking place? (Public forum, nonpublic forum) 5. Does it fall in a special category? (political, commercial, defamation, obscenity, incitement, fighting words, gov speech) 6. Do other restrictions apply? (prior restraints, overbreadth, vagueness, unfettered discretion)
69
Expressive conduct
Subject to lesser degree of protection than speech. Regulation upheld if: i) reg is within government’s power ii) furthers an important government interest iii) interest is unrelated to suppression of ideas iv) burden on speech is no greater than necessary
70
Content-based restrictions
apply to certain speech because of subject discussed or idea expressed. STRICT SCRUTINY
71
Content neutral restrictions (TPM)
RATIONAL BASIS. Must be 1) narrowly tailored to serve 2) a significant government interest and 3) leave open ample channels of communication.
72
Public v. Nonpublic Forum
PUBLIC FORUMS: Government may impose reasonable restrictions on time, place, or manner of protected speech that meet rational basis review. Content-based restrictions must still satisfy strict scrutiny. NONPUBLIC FORUMS: The government may regulate speech activities if regulation is viewpoint-neutral and reasonably related to legitimate government interest. Content-based restrictions are allowed, so long as not viewpoint-based.
73
Political speech
Regulations on campaign contributions: intermediate scrutiny Regulations on campaign expenditures: strict scrutiny
74
Commercial speech
The government may restrict commercial speech concerning lawful activity that’s not misleading if: 1) asserted governmental interest must be substantial 2) regulation must directly advance asserted interest 3) regulation must be narrowly tailored The government may restrict fraudulent/illegal transaction speech)
75
Obscenity
Obscene speech is not protected by 1A. Must be: 1) appeals to prurient interest (community) 2) depicts sexual content in patently offensive way (community) 3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value (national scale, decided by judge)
76
Incitement
A state may forbid speech advocating the use of force or unlawful action if: i) speech is directed to inciting imminent action ii) it’s likely to incite such action (clear, present danger)
77
Fighting Words
A speaker may be criminally punished for using fighting words if they are likely to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
78
Government speech
Government itself is not consteianed by 1A, so its speech need not be viewpoint neutral (besides establishment considerations). Includes: - monuments - flagpoles - specialty license plates - speech by government employees in their work
79
Prior Restraints
Restraints that prohibit speech before it occurs are presumed unconstitutional unless there is a particular harm to be avoided and procedural safeguards are provided to the speaker.
80
Overbreadth
Laws are void as overbroad if they regulate more speech than necessary to protect compelling gov interest.
81
Vagueness
Laws are void for vagueness if they fail to provide a person of ordinary intelligence with fair notice of what is prohibited.
82
Unfettered discretion
Laws that give government official power to regulate or restrict speech are void if they give official unfettered discretion.
83
Freedom of association
Laws that prohibit participation in a group must meet strict scrutiny. In order to criminally punish someone based on their association, must have active membership with KNOWLEDGE of group’s subversive nature and intent to further illegal objectives.