Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Bar prep > Con Law > Flashcards

Con Law Flashcards

1
Q

Article 3 limits juridiction of the federal courts to all “cases and controversies”

Is the case one the Constitution permits the federal court to hear?

A
  1. arising under the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties (federal question)
  2. between two or more states
  3. between citizens of different states (diversity)
  4. between a state and citizens of foreign states
  5. admiral and maritime cases
  6. cases where the U.S. is a party

The court cannot render an advisory opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

11th Amendment: sovereign immunity

A
  • A private individual cannot sue a state for money damages or for injunctive relief in federal/another state court unless there is
    1. consent by the state OR
    2. consent by Congress
  • Does not apply to
    -actions by the US government or other governments
    -actions against counties, municipalities, or local governments
    -if the plaintiff is seeking an injunction against a state officer for: (1) injunctive relief, (2) money damages to be paid out of their own pocket, (3) money damages that would result in prospective payment from the state

Congress cannot do away with a state’s 11th Amendment immunity unless it does so under a statute that unambiguously asserts that it does so, and does so under amendments that were ratified after the 11th amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Federal courts limitations on pending state court proceedings

A

Federal courts should not enjoin (prohibit) pending state court proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Political question doctrine

SCREAM

A

federal courts do not decide political questions–questions which are either committed by the Constitution to another branch of gov or not inherently capable of being decided by the judiciary (SCREAM)
* seating of delegates at a national political convention
* challenges to impeachment and removal procedures
* “republican form of government” clause issues
* the election and qualifications of Congress
* procedures to amend the Constitution
* military or foreign affairs decisions by the President

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the requirements for a court to hear a case?

Justiciability

A

Federal courts can hear a matter only if there is a “case or controversy”
1. standing
-injury, causation, redressability
2. ripe
-real injury has resulted or there is a strong likelihood of actual injury
3. not moot
-a real live controversy must exist

The federal court cannot render an advisory opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Standing

A
  • injury in fact
    -actual or imminent personal injury (rather than hypothetical)
  • causation
    -the harm must be fairly traceable to the defendant’s actions
  • redressability
    -a favorable decision would eliminate the harm or remedy the injuy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mootness

CCCC

A
  • In order for a court to adjudicate a case it must not be moot
  • a real live controversey must exist at all stages of review
  • a case is not considered moot (even though it appears so) (CCCC)
    -capable of repetition to tha particular plaintiff
    -class action: at least one member of the class is still affected
    -collateral consequences: there are other consequences that will still affect the person
    -ceased activity voluntarily
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Third party standing

A
  • 3rd party cannot sue to enforce someone else’s rights unless there is
    1. a special relationship between the party and third person AND
    2. a reason the third party does not want to or cannot raise his own rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Organization standing

A
  • an organization can sue for an injury to itself and for injuries to its members if
    1. a member(s) has standing
    2. the member’s injury is related to the purpose of the association, AND
    3. individual members are not required to participate in the lawsuit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Citizen standing, tax payer standing, legislator standing

A
  • There is no citizen or tax payer standing
  • there is an exception for taxpayer challeneges
    1. if a law enacted under Congress’s taxing and spending powers AND
    2. the plaintiff alleges that Congress exceeded a specific constituional limit on the power
  • Legislators have no standing to challenge laws they do not think are constitutional unless they have a personal and concrete injury

Exception: Plaintiff alleges an establishment clause challenge to a taxing and spending law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What cases does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction over?

A
  • The SC has original jd over any case that involves (APS) ambassadors, public ministers, consuls, or where the state is a party
  • SC has original and exclusive jd for lawsuits between states
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What cases does the supreme court have apellate jurisdiction over?

appellate jurisdiction

A

The SC can review decision of
* decisions by three judge federal district court that grants or denies injunctive relief
* federal courts of appeal AND
* federal decisions made by state courts if
1. the case involves a matter of federal law,
2. it is a final judgment,
3. from the highest state court authorized to hear it, AND
4. was not made on adequate and independent nonfederal grounds (Ask: If the SC decided the issue of federal law in the opposite way, would it make any difference in the outcome? If no, the SC will not hear it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Separation of powers - Congress

A
  • Congress only has the lawmaking powers the Constitution gives it
    -all powers not given to the federal gov are reserved for the states
    -congress does not have police power except over federal lands it owns (MILD: military base, indian territory, federal lands, district of columbia)
  • Congress needs bicameralism and presentment to pass laws
    1. bicameralism: a majority vote in both houses
    2. presentment: presented to the president to sign into law or veto (Congress can override a presidential veto with 2/3 majority vote in each house)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the powers of congress?

A
  1. necessary and proper (combined with an enumerated power)
  2. taxing
  3. spending
  4. commerce
  5. property
  6. war and defense
  7. admiral and maritime
  8. investigatory
  9. postal
  10. copyright and patent
  11. coin money
  12. citizenship
  13. enforcement
  14. delegate
  15. impeachment
  16. speech and debate immunity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

necessary and proper power

Congress

A

Congress has the power to make all laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out any of its specifically granted enumerated powers
* must be combined with an enumerated power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

taxing power

congress

A
  • congress may tax and spend for the general welfare
  • congress may impose a tax to regulate or prohibit behavior so long as it raises some revenue (so long as the tax has a reasonable relationship to revenue and congress has the power to regulate the taxed activity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

spending power

congress

A
  • congress has the power to spend for any public purpose (extremely broad)
  • cannot commandeer states to enact a federal program
  • congress may place a condition on receipt of federal funds. The condition must
    1. serve the general welfare
    2. be unambiguous
    3. relate to a legitimate federal interest
    4. not be unduly coercive and
    5. not require states to violate individual liberties

MEE: Only tested in 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

commerce power

A

Congress can regulate
* the channels and instrumentalities of interstate commerce,
* persons and things in interstate commerce, OR
* anything that has a “substantial effect” on interstate commerce
i.e., Congress can regulate anything economic or anything noneconomic that sustantially affects interstate commerce (even if purely intrastate)
* Can’t regulate noneconomic activity that does not substantially effect interstate commerce
* can’t commandeer states and force them to enact federal laws
-regulate states directly or
-regulate indirectly by threatening to take away funding

MEE: only tested in 2012

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

war and defense powers

A
  • congess has the power to
    1. declare war
    2. support an army, navy, militia; and
    3. mobilize troops during wartime
  • may establish military courts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

enforcement powers

13th, 14th, 15th amendents

A

written into the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments
* congress may enforce these amendments with legislation that is “congruent and proportional” (can’t create new rights or expand)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

power to delegate powers

A

Congess can delegate legislative power to executive agencies or the judiciary
* exception: the power can’t be uniquely delegated to congress by the constitution
* there must be intelligible standards used in delegating the power (easy standard)
* must not be a separation of powers problem (legislative veto)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

impeachment powers

A

congress can remove the president, vice president, federal judges, and officers of the US only by impeachment
* for treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors
* the house has the sole power to impeach by majority vote
* the senate convicts by a 2/3 vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the powers of the president?

A

Domestic powers:
* veto power
* enforcement of laws
* appointment and removal power
* pardon power
war & foreign powers:
* conduct operations once war is declared and respond to attacks
* enter into treaties or executive agreements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

veto power

A
  • president have 10 ays to sign or veto a law
  • if he does not sign within 10 days
    -the bill passes by default if Congress is in session
    -the bill is automatically vetoed if Congress is not in session
  • line item veto is unconstitutional
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Youngstown test

Take care clause

Enforcement of laws

A
  • president acts w/express or implied authoirty of congress = actions are valid
  • president acts where congress is silent = action will be upheld if it does not take over the power of another branch or prevent it from carrying out its tasks
  • president acts against congress’s express will = president’s action invalid

president must enforce congressional laws and “take care” that they be faithfully executed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

appointment and removal power

A
  • president has the power to appoint and remove executive officials
  • president appoints principal officers with the advice and consent of the senate
    -congress cannot appoint officers (but can vest appointment of inferior officers)
  • president can remove executive officials w/o cause, at will unless congress limits removal for good cause
    -congress can limit removal where independence from the president is desirable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

pardon power

A

president can only pardon for federal crimes

Cannot undue an impeachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

war and foreign affairs powers

president

A
  • president can conduct military operations once war is declared and respond to attacks or take emergency actions
  • president can enter into treaties with a 2/3 senate vote
    -self-executing = no further legislation needed to implement
    -non self executing = further legislation needed to implement
    -prevails over earlier federal legislation but not the constitution
  • president can enter into executive agreements w/o senate ratification
    -federal law prevails
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

presidential immunities

A
  • president is absolutely immune fom civil suits for damages for any official acts he took as president
  • president had a presumptive privilege to not disclose presidential communications (use balancing test)
30
Q

federal preemption

A

federal law is supreme and preempts state law. preemption occurs when:
1. when there is an actual conflict between state and federal law (state law is inconsistent with federal law and it is impossible to comply with both)
2. when state law prevents achievement of a federal objective
3. congress has passed such extensive regulation that it means to “occupy the field”

31
Q

Can states control the federal government?

A

No, states cannot sue, tax, or regulate the federal government

32
Q

when does federal law preempt state law?

A
  1. when there is an actual conflict between federal and state law
  2. when the state law prevents achievement of a federal objective
  3. congress has passed such extensive regulations
33
Q

privileges AND immunities clause

A

States cannot discriminate against
* out of state
* citizens
* with respect to fundamental rights
* unless there is a substantial justification and there is no less restrictive means

34
Q

dormant commerce clause

A
  • states cannot discriminate against interstate commerce. discrimination occurs when:
    1. laws that expressly discriminate against interstate commerce in favor of in-state commerce
    -automatically invalid
    2. laws that discriminate against interstate commerce but were supposedly passed to promote the health, safery, or welfare of the state’s citizens
    -apply strict scutiny (state must show the law was necessary to serve a compelling state interest and there is no reasonable non-discriminatory alternative)
  • if a state law is nondiscriminatory on its face but still burdens interstate commerce, it is valid only if it serves an important state interest and does not impose an unreasonble burden
    -apply a balancing test
35
Q

when can states tax interstate commerce?

A
  • States may not impose discriminatory taxes on interstate commerce (if a law does it is invalid)
  • if the tax does not expressly discriminate against interstate commerce, see if the burden outweighs the benefit
    1. there must be a substantial nexus between the taxpayer and the state
    2. the tax must be fairly apportioned, and
    3. there must be a fair relationship between the tax and service/benefits provided by the state
36
Q

exceptions to the dormant commerce clause

A
  • congress passes the law
    -congress can always pass a law the discriminates against interstate commerce
  • market participant doctrine
  • If the state is acting as a market participant or business (instead of a regulator)
  • traditional government function
37
Q

full faith and credit clause

A

courts in one state must honor judgments of courts in another state if
* the court that rendered the judgment had jurisdiction,
* the judgment is on the merits, and
* the judgment is final

38
Q

interstate compact cause

A

states may not enter into agreements with other states that increase the political power of the states at the expense of federal supremacy unless they have the consent of congress

39
Q

which amendments apply to the states?

A
  • 1st (free speech, press, religion),
  • 2nd (bear arms),
  • 4th (unreasonable searches and seizures),
  • 6th (confrontation),
  • 8th (prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, excessive fines clause)

5th (right to a grand jury) and 7th (right to a jury trial in a civil case) do not

40
Q

when is there state action?

A
  • when a state passes a law or permits officials to take action
  • when a private actor is performing a traditional and exclusive government function
  • when the private action is closely controlled by the state
  • stat action is present
    -entwinement, judicial approval, discriminatory law enforcement, state authorization

Need state action to sue under the 1st, 14th, or 15 amendments

41
Q

when does a law violate the contracts clause?

A

when the law
* substantially impairs
* preexisting contracts
* UNLESS there is an important and letgitimate public interest AND
* the law is reasonable and narrowly tailors

42
Q

ex post facto laws

A

neither the states nor the federal government can pass laws that
* retroactively alters
* criminal laws
* in a substantially prejudicial manner
* for the purose of punishing a person for some past activity

43
Q

bill of attainder

A

neither the state nor federal government may pass laws that
* specifically identifies people to be punished;
* imposes punishiment; and
* does so w/o a judicial trial

44
Q

procedural due process

A

the government cannot deprive a person of life, liberty, or property w/o due process of law
* if the government deprives a person
* of life, liberty, or property
-property can be personal or real property, public education, public employment that is not at-will
* it must give notice and an opportunity to be heard, look at
-the interests of the individual in retaining their property,
-the risk of error, and
-the cost and administrative burden

a person can be a corportation, non-citizen, or any citizen

45
Q

what is a taking?

A
  • physical invasion
  • regulatory taking
    1. the econmic impact of the regulation on the claimant
    2. whether the regulation substantially interferes with distinct, investment-backed expectations of the claimant, and
    3. the character of the governmental action
  • regulatory taking–exaction
    -the government enacts a regulation that restricts the owner’s use of property as a condition to allowing the owner to develop the land
    -this is a taking unless the government can show:
    1. a legitimate government interest (the city’s requirement mut be related to the burden imposed) and
    2. rough proportionality (individualized finding that the requirement by the city is related to the impact of the proposed development)

a temporary taking is not generally considered a taking

Neither the federal government nor the states can take private property for a public use w/o just compensation

46
Q

what are fundamental rights?

A
  1. privacy rights (MOPPS)
    -Marriage (including divorce)
    -Obscenity (in the home)
    -Parental and family rights
    -Procreation and contraception
    -Sexual relations
  2. the right to vote
    -states can enact age, residency, and citizenship qualifications
    -partisan gerrymandering i a political question
  3. the right to interstate travel
    -14th amendment privileges OR immunities cluse allows every citizen to travel between states, move to a new state, and enjoy the same privileges and immunities as other citizens
  4. first amendment rights
  5. the right to refuse medical treatment (by a competent adult)

apply strict scrutiny: the government must show (i) a compelling interest and (ii) the law is necessary (narrowly tailored) to achieve that interest

47
Q

what standard of review applies to due process claims related to non fundamental rights?

A

rational basis: the plaintiff has to show the law is
* not rationally related to
* any legitimate purpose
includes
-economic regulation
-right to education
-zoning
-right to welfare
-the right to lead a certain “lifestyle”

48
Q

what is strict scrutiny for EP cases

A

the government must prove the law is narrowly tailored (necessary) to achieve a compelling interest

49
Q

what is intermediate scrutiny for EP cases

A

the government must prove the classification is subtantially related to an important government interest

50
Q

what is rational basis for EP cases

A

the plaintiff must prove the law is not rationally related to a legitimate government interest

51
Q

when do you apply strict scrutiny in EP cases

A
  1. fundamental rights
  2. alienage * by the state
    -political function exception: states may exclude non-citizens from government jobs (cops, gov. officials, public school teachers)
  3. race/ethnicity
    -express discrimination
    -neutral on its face but written with the intent/purpose to discriminate
    -neutral on its face but applied in a discriminatory manner

FAR

Apply rational basis when the federal government discriminates on the basis of alienage

52
Q

when does intermediate scrutiny apply in EP cases

A
  1. gender
    -government must show an “exceedingly persuasive justification”
    -the government interest must be genuine (not made up)
    -remedying past discrimination is an important interest
  2. illegitimacy
53
Q

what is a compelling interest for EP purposes

A
  • race/ethnicity
    -diversity in education at universities
    (i) race can be a factor or a “plus”
    (ii) there needs to be an indivualized review
    -ovecoming present conseqences of past discrimination by that exact same party
54
Q

when does rational basis apply in EP cases

A
  • age
  • wealth
  • poverty
  • education
  • mental capacity
  • other
55
Q

when is remedying past societal discrimination OK?

equal protection

A
  • gender cases
  • NOT allowed in racial disrimination cases
56
Q

what standard of review applies to viewpoint based speech restrictions?

A

strict scrutiny: the government must show the regulation is necessary to serve a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to that end

57
Q

what standard of review applies to content based speech regulations?

A

strict scrutiny: the government must show the regulation is necessary to serve a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to that end

58
Q

what are the exceptions for content based speech restrictions?

A
  1. symbolic speech
  2. low value speech
  3. less protected speech
59
Q

what standard of review is used for symbolic speech

A

must be narrowly tailoed to an important governmental interest and unrelated to the supression of speech

intermediate

60
Q

what standard applies to content neutral speech restrictions

A

the government must show it has an important governmnt interest and the regulation does not burden substantially more speech than necessary

intermediate

61
Q

define the types of unprotected speech. what standard applies?

A
  • apply rational basis
  • speech inciting immediate lawless or violent behavior
    -the government may prohibit speech directed at inciting and likely to incite imminent lawlessness
    -look for a riotous crowd
  • fighting words
    -words likely to incite immediate violene (usually overbroad or vague)
    -fighting word statutes designed to punish certain viewpoints are unconstitutional
  • true threats or verbal acts as conduct
  • obscenity
    1. appeals to the prurient interest in sex (apply local standards)
    2. depicts sexual conduct in a way that is patently offensive (apply local standards)
    3. lacks serious artistic, literary, political, or scientific value
62
Q

what standard applies to commercial speech

A
  • speech must be lawful and not misleading
  • statute must serve a substantial government interest, directly advance that interest, and be narrowly tailored
63
Q

what standard applies to sexual or indecent speech

A

the regulation must serve a substantial government interest and leave open reasonable alternative channels of communication

64
Q

what is a public forum? what stadard applies?

A
  • public forum
    1. traditional public fora = streets, sidewalks, parks
    2. designated public fora = forums the gov. chooses to open (schools, state fair grounds)
  • three part test (CNA)
    1. statute must be content neutral
    2. narrowly tailored to serve an important (substantial) government interest
    3. must leave open alternative channels of communication
65
Q

what are non public forums? what standard applies?

A
  • non public forum = forums not historically associated with the free exchange of ideas
    -militar bases, advertising sold on city buses, prisons, gov. workplaces, airports, school mailboxes, sidewalks on postal services property
  • must be viewpoint neutral and reasonably related to a legitimate governmental interest

rational basis

66
Q

when are licensing statutes valid?

A

NODS
* neutral
* objective
* definite standards

67
Q

when can speech in schools be regulated?

A

the regulation must be reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical (educational) concerns

68
Q

what applies when a law favors one religion?

A

strict scrutiny

69
Q

what standard applied to laws that are religiously neutral on their face?

A

reference historical practices and understandings
* if historical practices show it is constitutional it will be upheld
* if historical practices show the law is unconstitutional, it will be struck down

70
Q

free exercise

A
  • government cannot punish/burden a person based on their genuinely held religious beliefs
  • gov. looks at sincerity
71
Q

how can the government regulate religiously motivated conduct?

A
  • gov can regulate or prohibit activity so long as the law is neutral and of general applicability
  • if the purpose of a law is to prevent, burden, or interfere with religion, apply strict scrutiny
    -the gov has to show the law is necessary (narrowly tailored) to achieve a compelling interest

Bar prep (13 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions