Con Crim Pro Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Crim Pro: Punishment 8th and Death Penalty 1. Statutory Limits? 2. Evidentiary Requirements? 3. Categorical exclusions? 4. MD?

A
  1. Violates 8th if there is an automatic category for the imposition of the death penalty 2. In deciding whether to impose the death penalty, jurors must consider all potentially mitigating evidence 3. Excluded from death penalty: A) mentally retarded B) PRESENTLY insane C) under 18 at the time of the offense 4. MD - D has an automatic appeal to the COA for both the sentence and the determination of guilt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Crim Pro: 5th Privilege Against Compelled Self-Incrimination Three ways to eliminate this privilege

A
  1. Grant of Immunity - Prosecutors can grant “use and derivative use” immunity, which bars the government from using your testimony or anything derived from it to convict you —–However, an individual can be convicted based on evidence obtained prior to the grant of immunity 2. Taking the Stand - D waives the ability to take the fifth as to anything within the scope of cross-examination if he takes the stand 3. Statute of Limitations - No privilege if SoL has run on the underlying crime since a witness’ testimony could not expose him to criminal prosecution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): What are the 4 exceptions to the “good fiath” doctrine?

A
  1. The affidavit supporting the warrant application is so egregiously lacking in PC that no reasonable officer would have relied on it; 2. The warrant is so facially deficient in particularity that officers could not reasonably presume it to be valid; 3. The affidavit relied on by the magistrate contains KNOWING OR RECKLESS FALSEHOODS that are necessary to the PC finding; or 4. The magistrate who issued the warrant is biased in favor of the prosecution.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): Does an officer’s “good faith” reliance on a defective warrant overcome its constitutional deficits?

A

Yes, unless one of 4 exceptions apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Miranda, Exclusion Limitations

A
  1. Statements violating Miranda may always be used to impeach Defendant’s testimony on cross-examination; MAY NOT impeach the testimony of third parties 2. Failure to give Miranda does not require suppression of the physical fruits of incriminating statements, SO LONG AS STATEMENTS ARE VOLUNTARY 3. If a statement is made prior to Miranda and repeated after Miranda it is admissible so long as the first statement was not obtained through inherently coercive police tactics or methods offensive to due process 4. Harmless Error Rule - Improperly admitted evidence under Miranda remains if the gov’t can prove BRD that its inclusion was harmless because the defendant would have been convicted without the tainted evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Crim Pro: Pretrial Identifications Remedial Considerations

A
  1. Remedy is to exclude witness’s in-court identification HOWEVER, an in-court identification will still be allowed if the prosecution can prove that it is based on observations OTHER THAN the unconstitutional show-up, line-up or photo array —–Factors to consider: 1) witness’ opportunity to view the D at the crime scene 2) the specificity of the description given to the police, and 3) the certainty of the witness’ identification
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): In Maryland, how many days do officers have to execute a search warrant?

A

15 days. If the search warrant is not executed within 15 days of its issuance, a new search warrant must be obtained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Crim Pro: Pretrial Identifications 3 types

A
  1. Line-ups 2. Show-ups 3. Photo Arrays
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Crim Pro: Exception of need for Consent to Search Automobiles

A

Vehicles have ready mobility and people have less expectation of privacy Police need probable cause to believe contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in the vehicle - Can search entire vehicle and open any package, container etc that may reasonably contain the items for which there was probable cause to search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Crim Pro: Terry Frisks

A

Pat down of the body and outer clothing for weapons that is justified by officer’s belief that a suspect is armed and dangerous. - if officer finds something reasonably believed to be a weapon it can be seized - if officer finds something recognized as contraband without manipulating it, it can also be seized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #1 (Is the search or seizure governed by the 4th A?): What is the standard for a reasonable expectation of privacy?

A
  1. An actual or subjective expectation of privacy in the area searched or seized, AND 2. The privacy expectation must be one that society recognizes as reasonable (EX: A police search is presumptively UNREASONABLE when it uses a device that is not in public use to explore details of the home that officers could not have known without physical intrusion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #4 What is the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine?

A

Evidence (both physical and testimonial) derived from prior unconstitutional conduct -Inadmissible in the prosecutor’s case-in-chief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Crim Pro: Wiretapping and Eavesdropping 4 Major requirements

A

Mnemonic Screen Telephone Calls Carefully Suspected persons - Warrant names the suspected persons whose conversations are to be overheard Time - Wiretap must be for a strictly limited time period Crime - There must be PC that a specific crime has been committed Conversations - Warrant must describe with particularity the conservations that can be overheard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Crim Pro: Guilty Pleas and Plea Bargaining What must D be informed of?

A

Judge must inform the D in open court on the record: 1. The nature of the charges, including required elements of the charged offense, and 2. The consequences of the plea, e.g. waiver of the right to plead not guilty, waiver of the right to a trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Crim Pro: Trial Rights Confronting Adverse Witnesses

A

Right to face-to-face confrontation does not contravene important public policy concerns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Crim Pro: Punishment 8th Am. standard?

A

Disallows criminal penalties that are grossly disproportionate to the seriousness of the offense committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Crim Pro: 5th Privilege Against Compelled Self-Incrimination When can you take the Fifth?

A

In any proceeding in which an individual testifies under oath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Invoking Miranda, Right to Counsel

A
  1. Request must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable office would understand the request for counsel 2. All interrogation must cease unless initiated by the suspect 3. Right is not offense-specific, police may not question suspect regarding any crimes without a lawyer present 4. Request expires 14 days after a suspect is released from custody —May obtain a waiver, if waiver is knowing, voluntary, and intelligent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #1 (Is the search or seizure governed by the 4th A?): Which individuals DO NOT or MAY have standing to challenge the conduct of a government agent?

A
  1. Those who do not own or reside, but who are OVERNIGHT GUESTS in the premises searched MAY have standing, as long as the area searched is that which an overnight guest would be expected to access (common areas and the bathroom, but not the host’s bedroom closet) 2. Those who own the property seized MAY have standing, as long as they have a reasonable expectation or privacy in the area from which the property was seized (EX: BF does NOT have standing to challenge drugs found in GF’s purse) 3. Passengers in cars DO NOT have standing to challenge a search of the car, as “mere passengers” do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the vehicle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Crim Pro: Double Jeopardy When does it attach?

A
  1. Jury trial – when the jury is sworn 2. Bench trial – when the first witness is sworn 3. Guilty plea – when the court accepts the defendant’s plea unconditionally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #4 What is the Exclusionary Rule and how does it work?

A

Evidence, whether physical or testimonial, that is obtained in a violation of a federal statutory or constitutional provision is inadmissible in court against the individual whose rights were violated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): What are the exceptions to the “knock and announce” rule?

A
  1. If it would be FUTILE to K&A; 2. If it would be DANGEROUS to K&A; or 3. If it would INHIBIT the investigation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Crim Pro: Consent to search shared properties

A

Any adult resident can consent to search of common areas. If co-tenants disagree objecting party prevails as to common areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Crim Pro: Terry Frisk- Protective Sweep

A

When making an in-home arrest police may sweep the residence for criminal confederates of the arrestee whose presence may threaten officer safety. - Officers have authority w/out prob cause to look in areas adjoining the place of arrest from which an attack could be immediately launched - officers must have additional facts sufficient to allow a reasonably prudent officer to conclude that an individual who may threaten offcer safety is present to justify a sweep of more remote areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Invoking Miranda, Right to Remain Silent

A
  1. Suspect must unambiguously invoke their right to remain silent 2. Then police must “scrupulously honor” the invocation —-Police may not badger a suspect 3. Police may re-initiate interrogation after waiting a SIGNIFICANT period of time & informing suspect of his Miranda rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Crim Pro: Double Jeopardy 4 Exceptions permitting retrial

A
  1. Hung jury 2. Mistrial for manifest necessity 3. A successful appeal, unless the reversal on appeal was based on insufficiency of the evidence presented by the prosecution at trial, or 4. A breach of the plea agreement by D
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #3 (Is the warrantless search through which criminal evidence was gathered valid?): What are the eight (8) exceptions to the warrant requirement?

A

“ESCAPIST:” 1. Exigent Circumstances 2. Search incidence to Arrest 3. Consent 4. Automobile 5. Plain View 6. Inventory 7. Special Needs 8. Terry “Stop and Frisk”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Crim Pro: Law of Arrest What is the Common Enterprise Theory?

A

During a traffic stop, if a cop finds evidence of a crime that suggests a common unlawful enterprise between the driver and his passengers, the officer may arrest ANY or ALL of them, based on a reasonable inference of shared dominion and control over the contraband

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): What is a magistrate NOT “neutral and detached?”

A

A judicial officer ceases to be sufficiently “neutral and detached” for 4th Amendment purposes when her conduct demonstrates BIAS in favor of the prosecution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Crim Pro: Trial Rights 6 Jury Characteristics

A
  1. Must be fair and impartial 2. Right to jury for any crime with a maximum sentence over 6 months 3. Must have 6 jurors — MARYLAND must have 12 4. If 6 jurors, verdicts must be unanimous, if 12 jurors, verdicts need not be unanimous —-MARYLAND, verdicts must be unanimous 5. Jury pool must be a cross section of the community 6. Peremptory challenges permitted so long as they are not based upon a juror’s race or gender
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #1 (Is the search or seizure governed by the 4th A?): What items are considered UNPROTECTED by the 4th Amendment?

A

Patty Achieved A Glorious Victory Over Her Opponents: 1. Paint scrapings on the outside of car 2. Account records held by bank 3. Airspace (anything that can be seen below public airspace) 4. Garbage left at curb for collection 5. Voice 6. Odors (most importantly those that emanate from your CAR or LUGGAGE) 7. Handwriting 8. Open fields (anytthing seen IN or ACROSS it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Crim Pro: Searches at Border

A

No 4th Amend rights at border w/ respect to routine searches of persons and effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Crim Pro: Inventory Searches

A

Most commonly occur in 2 contexts: 1. Arrestees when booked into jail 2. Vehicles when impounded Are constitutional provided: - regs governing them are reasonable in scope; - search itself complies w/ those regs; and - search is conducted in good faith (ie motivated solely by need to safeguard possessions and/or officer’s safety)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Crim Pro: Searches of Parolees

A

Warrantless, suspicionless searches of a parolee and his home are permissible as a condition of parole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #1 (Is the search or seizure governed by the 4th A?): When does an individual subjected to a search or seizure have standing to challenge the conduct of a government agent?

A

To have authority or “standing” to challenge the lawfulness of a S/S by a gov’t agent, an individual’s PERSONAL privacy rights must be invaded, not those of a third party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Standard for excluding under the 14th DPC?

A

Involuntariness = confession is that product of police coercion that overbears the suspect’s will MARYLAND - An otherwise voluntary confession will be suppressed if it is the product of promises or inducements

28
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): How may the police verify the sufficiency of an anonymous informant’s tip?

A

The sufficiency of the informant’s tip rests on corroboration by the police of enough of the tipster’s information to allow the magistrate to make a common sense practical determination that probable cause exists on a totality of the circumstances.

28
Q

Crim Pro: Pretrial Identifications 2 Substantive Challenges

A

RIGHT TO COUNSEL 1. 5th - Not applicable 2. 6th - A right to counsel exists at line-ups and show-ups that take place after formal charging; NO RIGHT TO COUNSEL AT PHOTO ARRAYS VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS under 14th 1. When the procedure is unnecessarily suggestive that it creates a substantial likelihood of misidentification —Courts weigh the reliability of a suggestive identification against its corrupting effect —-MARYLAND - Once D establishes that the ID was unnecessarily suggestive, the burden shifts to the state to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the reliability of the identification outweighs its corrupting effect

30
Q

Crim Pro: Guilty Pleas and Plea Bargaining Withdrawing the plea

A

D may only withdrawal guilty plea after sentencing if: 1. The plea is involuntary 2. There is a jurisdictional defect 3. Defendant prevails on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, or 4. PROSECUTOR FAILS TO FULFILL HIS OR HER PART OF THE BARGAIN

31
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): What are the 2 considerations as to whether or not a search warrant was properly executed by the police?

A
  1. Whether the officers executing the warrant complied with its terms and limitations, AND 2. Whether the officers executing the warrant complied with the “knock and announce” rule.
33
Q

Crim Pro: Law of Arrest Standard of Proof? Which Crimes?

A

Probable cause All crimes

34
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #1 (Is the search or seizure governed by the 4th A?): What are the 4 key questions?

A
  1. Was the S/S executed by a GOVERNMENT AGENT? 2. Was the S/S of an AREA OR ITEM protected by the 4th A? 3. Did the government agent either (a) PHYSICALLY INTRUDE on a protected area or item to obtain information; or (b) violate an individual’s REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY on a protected area or item? 4. Did the individual subjected to the S/S have STANDING to challenge the government agent’s conduct?
34
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): What is the definition of probable cause for purposes of issuing a warrant?

A

Probable cause requires proof of a FAIR PROBABILITY that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in the area searched.

37
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #1 (Is the search or seizure governed by the 4th A?): What is a GOVERNMENT AGENT?

A
  1. Publically-paid police (on or off-duty) 2. Private citizens (only if acting at the direction of the police) 3. Private security guards (only those deputized with the power to arrest, like campus security) 4. Public school administrators (principals, VP’s, etc.)
39
Q

Crim Pro: Law of Arrest When don’t you need an arrest warrant? –Do need it?

A

Arresting someone in a public place FELONIES - When they have PC to believe that the arrestee has committed a felony MISDEMEANORS - Those committed in the cops presence –In the person’s home or in the home of a third party so long as you also have a search warrant

39
Q

Crim Pro: Terry Stops- Traffic

A

Both driver and passengers are seized and all may challenge the legality of the stop. Officer may, at their discretion, order driver and passengers out of the car Dog sniffs are permissible provided the sniff doesn’t prolong the stop unreasonably - MD: an alert to the detection of drugs in a vehicle by a K9 establishes probable cause to search the vehicle, but doesn’t automatically establish prob cause to search a passenger

40
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #3 (Is the warrantless search through which criminal evidence was gathered valid?): How does the arrestee being “secured” change the permissibility of a search of an autmobile incident to arrest?

A

“Secured” (handcuffed/placed in squad car) Arrestee: Can only search the vehicle ONLY if reason to believe it contains evidence relating to the crime for which the arrest was made.

41
Q

Crim Pro: Law of Arrest When does an arrest occur?

A

Whenever the police take someone into custody against her will for prosecution or interrogation It is a de facto arrest when the police compel someone to come to the police station for questioning or fingerprinting

42
Q

Crim Pro: Grand Juries

A

Non-public body that issues indictments, which Maryland does not require for any crime

43
Q

Crim Pro: Wiretapping and Eavesdropping “Unreliable Ear” Doctrine and Assumption of the Risk

A

No 4th Am. complaint when you talk to someone wearing a while. You assume the risk that the other party will not keep your conversations private

45
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #1 (Is the search or seizure governed by the 4th A?): How can a search or seizure by a government agent implicate an individual’s 4th Amendment rights (2 ways)?

A
  1. By PHYSICALLY INTRUDING on a constitutionally protected area in order to obtain information; or 2. Violate an individual’s REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY
46
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #4 Exclusionary Rule - 3 Limitations

A
  1. Unconstitutionally obtained evidence is excluded from the prosecutor’s case-in-chief ONLY; however, it may still be used to impeach on cross 2. Failure to follow K&A does not exclude the evidence 3. Erroneous police conduct must be deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent 4. Not applicable to evidence erroneously obtained when executing a search warrant, provided that the mistake was reasonable
47
Q

Crim Pro: Guilty Pleas and Plea Bargaining Validity?

A

Judge must establish that it is voluntary and intelligent

48
Q

Crim Pro: Double Jeopardy General Rule?

A

Two offenses are not the same for purposes of double jeopardy if each contains an element the other does not –Prosecution of greater offense precludes prosecution of lesser offenses and vice-versa

50
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions 5 Characteristics for 6th Right to Counsel?

A
  1. Express constitutional guarantee 2. Attaches when D is FORMALLY CHARGED! 3. Applies to all CRITICAL STAGES of the prosecution that place after the filing of formal charges, including: arraignment, PC hearings, and police interrogation 4. Right is OFFENSE SPECIFIC - provides no protection for uncounseled interrogation for other UNCHARGED criminal activity 5. Incriminating statements violate 6th if those statements are DELIBERATELY ELICITED & the D did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his right to have his attorney present
51
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions When is Miranda necessary?

A

Two core requirements 1. CUSTODY DETERMINATION under a two-party, totality-of-the-circumstances test —Whether a reasonable person felt that she was not at liberty to end the interrogation and leave and, —Whether the environment presents the same inherently coercive pressures as the station house in Miranda 2. INTERROGATION - Any conduct the police knew or should have known was likely to elicit an incriminating response —Does not apply to spontaneous statements

52
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): Can a MD judge issue a “no knock” warrant?

A

No.

52
Q

Crim Pro: Double Jeopardy Apply to civil proceedings?

A

NO

54
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #3 (Is the warrantless search through which criminal evidence was gathered valid?): What are the requirements of a search incident to arrest?

A
  1. Arrest must be LAWFUL. 2. Search must be CONTEMPORANEOUS in time AND place with the lawful arrest. 3. Search includes body, clothing, and any containers within the arrestee’s IMMEDIATE CONTROL, without regard for the arresting offense (“WINGSPAN”)
55
Q

Crim Pro: Search and Seizure- Consent

A

Must be voluntary and intelligent. - Scope: areas where a reasonable officer would believe permission to search was granted - Must have actual or apparent authority to give consent, provided officer reasonably believed that the consenting party had actual authority

57
Q

Crim Pro: Trial Rights Right to effective Assistance of Counsel

A
  1. Deficiency prong - Counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness 2. Prejudice prong - But for the deficiency, the outcome of the trial would have been different Never effective unless there is some colorable argument that the defendant is NOT GUILTY
58
Q

Crim Pro: Plain View

A

3 requirements to seize item in plain view: 1. lawful access to place from which item can be plainly seen; 2. lawful access to item itself; AND 3. criminality of item must be immediately apparent

59
Q

Crim Pro: Searches Drug Testing

A

SCOTUS allows warrantless, suspicionless drug tests in a variety of contexts including: - railroad employees following an accident - public school children - DEA agents

60
Q

Crim Pro: Traffic Stops & Searches

A

Officer doesn’t need probable cause at time vehicle is pulled over provided probable cause is acquired before initiating the search

62
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Miranda, admitting testimonial responses during custodial interrogation

A
  1. The officer must reasonably convey to the suspect his or her core Miranda rights 2. Suspects valid waives his rights to silence and counsel
63
Q

Crim Pro: Terry Stops Police Pursuit and “seizure”

A

When being pursued by a police officer, an individual is seized ONLY if he submits to the officer’s authority by stopping or if the officer physically restrains.

64
Q

Crim Pro: Terry Car Frisks

A

When conducting a traffic stop, if an officer believes that a suspect is dangerous, they may search the passenger cabin limited to places where weapons may be placed or hidden

65
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Burden of Proof for Miranda

A

Prosecution bears the burden of proving a valid waiver of Miranda by POE

66
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): How do officers make sure they comply with the search warrant’s terms and limitations?

A

In executing the warrant, officers are allowed to search only those AREAS and ITEMS authorized by the language of the warrant (EX: Can’t search in a wallet for a stolen TV set, or in the kitchen when the warrant specifies only the bedroom)

67
Q

Crim Pro: Terry Frisk Evidentiary Standards

A

A Terry Frisk requires reasonable suspicion (lower threshold than prob cause - specific and articulable facts that inform an officer’s belief that suspect is armed and dangerous- OBJECTIVE reasonableness only - justified by concern for officer safety only - informant tip can satisfy the standard if tip contains sufficient predictive info, corroborated by police, to establish reliability -

68
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Where are the Miranda rights derived?

A

Self-Incrimination Clause of the 5th

69
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #4 Getting around Fruit of the Poisonous Tree

A

Must show a break in the causal link between the illegality and the criminal evidence later discovered: 1. Independent Source - There exists a source for the discovery and seizure that is distinct from the original illegality 2. Inevitable Discovery - Where the evidence would necessarily have been discovered through lawful means 3. Attenuation - Passage of time and intervening events purge the taint of the original illegality

71
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #1 (Is the search or seizure governed by the 4th A?): The 4th Amendment expressly protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures of their:

A
  1. Person (i.e. bodies) 2. Houses (including hotel rooms and curtilage, which is adjacent to the home “to which the activity of home life extends”) 3. Papers 4. Effects (personal belongings)
72
Q

Crim Pro: Searches of Schools

A

Warrantless searches of persons and personal effects of public schoolchildren are permissible to investigate violations of school rules provided search is reasonable at its inception and not excessively intrusive in light of the age and sex of student and nature of the infraction

73
Q

Crim Pro: Terry Stops

A

Brief detention or seizure for purpose of investigating suspicious conduct You are seized for purposes of 4th Amend when based on totality of circs, a reasonable person would not feel free to leave or to decline answering an officer’s questions. Consider: - whether officer brandishes weapon; - officer’s tone and demeanor; AND - whether individual was told they had the right to refuse consent

74
Q

Crim Pro: Double Jeopardy Sovereign Requirement

A

State and feds or different states

75
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #3 (Is the warrantless search through which criminal evidence was gathered valid?): What are the three types of exigent circumstances?

A
  1. Evanescent Evidence (that which would dissipate or disappear in the time it would take to get a warrant). 2. “Hot Pursuit” of Fleeing Felon (allows entry into the suspect’s home or that of a third party; all evidence discovered in plain view is admissible) 3. Emergency Aid Exception (allows entry w/out a warrant when there is an objectively reasonable basis for believing there is the need to lend emergency aid to address or prevent injury)
76
Q

Crim Pro: Trial Rights Evidentiary Disclosure

A

Prosecutor must disclose all material and exculpatory evidence —-additionally, in MARYLAND state must disclose without request, material subject to a motion to suppress: including (a) any statements made by the D and (b) any pretrial identifications

78
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Valid Miranda Waiver - 2 requirements

A
  1. Knowing and Intelligent - suspect must understand the NATURE of the rights and the CONSEQUENCES of abandoning them 2. It must be voluntary, i.e. free from police coercion
80
Q

Crim Pro: 5th Privilege Against Compelled Self-Incrimination Scope of Testimonial Privilege?

A
  1. Does not apply to the state’s use of our BODIES 2. Disallows negative prosecutorial comment on a defendant’s A) decision not to testify at his trial, or B) Invocation of his right to silence or counsel
81
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Validly executing a Miranda waiver

A
  1. Need not be express, it may be implied 2. After being giving Miranda warnings, a suspect waives them if he makes an uncoerced statement to the police
82
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #2 (Did the search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant satisfy the 4th Amendment requirements?): What must a search warrant specify in order to satisfy the particularity requirement?

A

The search warrant must specify (1) the place to be searched, and (2) the items to be seized.

83
Q

Search/Seizure Global Issue #3 (Is the warrantless search through which criminal evidence was gathered valid?): What is the permissible scope of a search of an automobile incident to arrest?

A

The Interior cabin (including closed containers) but NOT the trunk.

84
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Which three Ams. permit challenges?

A

14th DPC 6th Right to Counsel 5th Miranda Doctrine

85
Q

Crim Pro: 5th Privilege Against Compelled Self-Incrimination Failure to assert it, hurt in later proceedings?

A

Yes, must assert it at the first opportunity Failure to assert privilege at a civil proceeding may be used against you in a subsequent criminal proceeding

86
Q

Crim Pro: 5th Privilege Against Compelled Self-Incrimination Who can take it?

A

Anyone

87
Q

Crim Pro: Pretrial Detention 1. Standard of Proof? 2. Must there be a Detention Hearing for pretrial detention? 3. What is a “First-Appearance”? 4. Is Bail appealable?

A
  1. Probably cause 2. A hearing to determine PC is unnecessary to justify pretrial detention if A) grand jury issued an indictment or B) a magistrate issued an arrest warrant 3. Soon after arrest, D must be brought before a magistrate who: A) advises him of his rights, B) sets bail, and C) appoints counsel, if necessary —–MARYLAND: magistrate is a “District Court Commissioner” and there is a 24 hour time limit 4. Decisions regarding bail are immediately appealable?
88
Q

Crim Pro: Confessions Miranda, Public safety exception

A

Warnings are unnecessary if there is an IMMEDIATE CONCERN for public safety and any incriminating statements are admissible against the suspect