Con Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Nonstanding requirements

A

-Ripeness–sufficiently matured to warrant a decision
-Not moot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Standing requirements

A

-Injury in fact
-Causation
-Redressability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Causation definition

A

Traceable to D’s challenged conduct AND not attributable to a third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Redressability definition

A

Favorable ruling would eliminate P’s harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Zone of interests

A

Injury in fact–was P’s injury within the “zone of interests” that Congress meant to protect with the statute?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Third party standing requirements

A

-P has suffered injury AND
-T unable to assert own rights OR P’s injury adversely affects P’s relationship with T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Organizational Standing

A

-Members have injury in fact that would give them standing on their own behalf
-Members’ injury related to org’s purpose
-Neither the nature of the claim nor the relief requested requires participation of the individual members in the lawsuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Taxpayer standing?

A

-Generally no
-Exception: Challenge fed appropriation and spending measures IF measure (1) was enacted under Congress’s taxing and spending power AND (2) exceeds specific limitation on the power (Establishment Clause)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Requirement for SCOTUS to hear state court case

A

-NEED judgment turned on federal grounds
-REFUSE IF “adequate and independent” nonfederal grounds to support the state decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Political questions

A

-Con authority give to non-Jud branch OR
-Judicial process cannot resolve or enforce the question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

11A limit

A

Fed Ct cannot hear private claim against State Gov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sovereign immunity

A

-Bars private claim against State Gov in State Ct
-Bars private claim against State brought in another State’s Ct UNLESS D State consents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

11A/sovereign immunity for local gov?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interstate Commerce Definition

A

-Any activity affecting two or more states
-Transportation or traffic across state lines
-Anything that in the aggregate has a substantial effect on interstate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Types of Interstate Commerce

A

-Channels
-Instrumentalities
-Activities that have substantial effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Line item veto

A

No; POTUS can approve or veto whole bill, can’t edit the bill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Non-self-executing treaties

A

-Treaty that needs Congress legislation to effectuate its ends
-NOT law until Congress acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Youngstown standard

A

-Maximum POTUS authority: IF express or implied Congress authorization THEN action likely valid
-Twilight POTUS authority: IF no Congress authorization THEN action valid UNLESS action infringes on another branch’s powers OR prevents another branch from exercising its powers
-Minimum POTUS authority: IF POTUS acts against express will of Congress THEN likely invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Field preemption

A

IF Congress attended to occupy the entire field THEN no state or local regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Fed can regulate States through Spending Power IF the conditions

A

(1) are clearly stated,
(2) relate to the purpose of the program, AND
(3) are not unduly coercive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Privileges AND immunities clauses

A

14A: protects US citizenship
Article IV: prohibits a state from discriminating against nonresidents w/r/t fundamental rights (commercial activities AND civil liberties)

22
Q

What activities does Article IV Privileges AND Immunities Clause protect?

A

-Right to pursue livelihood
-Creditor priority
-Licensing
-Taxes against nonresidents
-Hiring preference for residents
-Civil liberties

23
Q

Standard for state to discriminate against nonresident

A

-Nonresidents cause or are part of the State’s problem
-No less restrictive means
-Necessary to achieve an important government purpose

24
Q

14A Privileges OR immunities clause

A

States may not deny citizens
-right to petition Congress to redress grievances
-right to vote for Fed
-right to enter public lands
-right to interstate travel

25
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

State/local gov can regulate interstate commerce IF:

-Congress has not enacted laws on the subject
-State/local law does not discriminate against out-of-state competition to benefit local interests
-State/local law is not unduly burdensome

26
Q

When is nondiscriminatory state/local commerce law valid?

A

Nondiscriminatory law invalidated ONLY IF burden on interstate commerce outweighs the promotion of legitimate, nondiscriminatory local interest

27
Q

21st Amendment

A

-State gov controls importation of liquor and liquor sales
-Under Commerce Clause, State cannot give too much economic preference to local liquor manufacturers

28
Q

How to analyze commerce question?

A

(1) Is there fed leg that supersedes state reg?
(2) Is there fed leg that occupies the field?
(3) Does fed leg authorize otherwise impermissible state reg?
=>IF NO
(4) Does state leg discriminate against OR place undue burden on out-of-state commerce?
(5) IF SO, need important state interest AND no reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives
OR
State is a market participant

29
Q

14A Equal Protection applies IF

A

-Gov action is based on suspect class OR
-Gov action burdens a fundamental right

30
Q

Con rights NOT applicable to states

A

3A quartering troops
5A right to grand jury indictment in crim cases
7A right to jury trial in civil cases

31
Q

14A applies to states or fed?

A

States

32
Q

14A guarantees

A

Life, liberty, property, due process, equal protection

33
Q

14A applies to private entity IF

A

State is “significantly involved” in the private entity (beyond mere granting of license or providing essential services)

34
Q

Bill of attainder

A

Legislative act that inflicts punishment without a judicial trial

35
Q

DPC protections?

A

Life, liberty, property

36
Q

Does DPC protect from negligent gov action depriving a person of rights?

A

No; DPC violation requires intent

37
Q

Fundamental substantive due process rights

A

Bill of Rights, privacy, interstate travel, voting

38
Q

Con tests and burdens of proof

A

-Strict scrutiny: race, alienage, national origin, fundamental rights
-State must show (1) necessary (2) compelling gov interest

-Intermediate scrutiny: gender, nonmarital children
-State must show (1) substantially related (2) important gov interest

-RB: everything else
-P must show not rationally related to legitimate gov interest

39
Q

Physical Taking

A

NEED
-Public Use
-Just Compensation (FMV)

40
Q

Regulatory Taking

A

IF reg leaves no economically viable use THEN reg taking
IF economically viable use, balance:
-Economic impact
-Investment-backed expectations
-Public interest

41
Q

Types of Unprotected Speech

A

Incitement, true threats, obscenity, fighting words, false advertising, defamation

42
Q

Incitement elements

A

(1) Intended to (2) AND reasonably likely to (3) produce imminent (4) lawless action

43
Q

Defamation of public official

A

P must show (1) defamation (2) falsity (3) actual malice
IF private concern THEN no actual malice needed

44
Q

Review of content-based speech restrictions

A

Strict scrutiny

45
Q

Review of content-neutral speech restrictions

A

Intermediate scrutiny
Time/place/manner ok
Cannot be overbroad

46
Q

Content-based regulation of speech on public forums and traditional public forums

A

Strict scrutiny

47
Q

Content-neutral regulation of speech on public forums and traditional public forums

A

Intermediate scrutiny
Need “ample alternative channels”

48
Q

Gov regulation of speech in limited public forums & nonpublic forums

A

Can reasonably restrict speech to preserve space for intended use BUT strict scrutiny for content-based regulation

49
Q

Commercial speech regulation

A

NOT protected IF misleading or unlawful
IF lawful THEN intermediate scrutiny (need “ample alternative channels”)

50
Q

Free Exercise Clause Standard of Review

A

Strict scrutiny IF reg based on religious conduct, status, or belief
Neutral reg of general application is constitutional IF not applied in a discriminatory manner

51
Q

Free Exercise neutral reg of general application

A

Must apply to all people
CANNOT give Gov discretion to make exemptions

52
Q

Establishment Clause and standard of review

A

-Gov must remain neutral w/r/t religion
-Gov cannot directly/indirectly promote or prevent exercise of religion
-Standard of review: history and tradition; understanding of Framers