Complicity Flashcards
What knowledge must an offender have to be considered an accessory before the fact?
An accessory before is one who is absent at the time of the actual offence but
counsels,
commands or
abets another to commit that offence
Must also have knowledge of the crime to be committed.
What is the test for common purpose?
Three elements required for common purpose
1. A joint criminal enterprise (foundational crime)
2. Participation by the accused in the enterprise
3. An incidental crime committed by a participant outside the agreed enterprise but within their contemplation
What is an innocent agent?
principle in the 1st degree may commit crime through an innocent agent.
An innocent agent is a person who
1. Is under the directions of a principle 2. commits the actus reus of the offence however lacks the appropriate mens rea.
Eg. Father gives daughter poison tea & tells her to give it to grandmother without knowing what it contains. Grandmother dies. Father commits murder via innocent agent = daughter.
What are the principles of a Joint Criminal Enterprise?
What is the case law for Joint Criminal Enterprise?
Prosecution must prove
1. Agreement: existence of a joint criminal enterprise / agreement and
2. Participation: by the accused in that event.
Case Law: R v TANGYE
‘A joint criminal enterprise exists where two or more persons reach an understanding or arrangement amounting to an agreement between them that they will commit a crime…’
What are the principles of a Extended Common Purpose?
- Agreement of a foundational offence
- An incidental offence occurs
- Accused foresaw the incidental crime as a possible incident of the joint criminal enterprise
What is required to be considered an accessory after the fact?
Is when someone who after the commission of a SIO & with knowledge (direct or implied) that a SIO has been committed either
Receives,
Comforts,
Harbours,
Assists or
Maintains the offender
Didn’t have knowledge prior to the offence but have to know what the offence is when they help.
What is the doctorine of Common Purpose?
- If two or more wrongdoers act together in pursuance of a common unlawful objective, then every act done in furtherance of that common purpose, by any one of them is at law done by all of them.
What is the case law and what does it say regarding common puprose?
McAuliffe v R confirms that it is a subjective test regarding what is contemplated[1]
‘.. In accordance with the emphasis the law now places upon the actual state of mind of an accused person, the test has become a subjective one and the scope of the common purpose is to be determined by what was contemplated by the parties sharing the purpose’